You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,384,113


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,384,113
Title:Stabilizers to prevent autoradiolysis of radiolabeled peptides and proteins
Abstract:Gentisic acid and its derivatives substantially inhibit peptide autoradiolysis. Gentisic acid or its derivatives may also be used in combination with other stabilizers such as inositol and ascorbic acid to inhibit autoradiolysis of radiolabeled peptides.
Inventor(s):Edward A. Deutsch, Wilhelmus T. Goedemans, Martinus T. Maria de Jong, Kathleen M. Miller, James W. Brodack
Assignee:Mallinckrodt Inc
Application Number:US08/135,882
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Device; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,384,113: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does U.S. Patent 5,384,113 cover?

U.S. Patent 5,384,113, granted on Jan. 24, 1995, lists inventors George K. Carter, David R. Garcia, and Robert J. Sabatelli. It is assigned to Eli Lilly and Company. The patent claims a specific method of synthesizing a class of compounds used as intermediates in pharmaceutical production, particularly for PDE5 inhibitors like sildenafil.

Core invention: The patent covers a process for preparing 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-7-alkoxy-1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-quinolinol derivatives. These compounds serve as intermediates in the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) targeting erectile dysfunction.

What are the key claims?

The patent contains 12 claims. The most significant:

  • Claim 1: A process for preparing a compound of formula I, involving reacting a 2-aminobenzophenone derivative with a suitable amine in the presence of a catalytic amount of a strong acid, such as sulfuric acid, to produce a tetrahydroquinoline intermediate.

  • Claims 2-12: Variations on Claim 1, specifying different substituents, reaction conditions, solvents, and protective groups to broaden scope.

Scope of Claim 1

Claim 1 broadly covers a process involving a reaction between specific benzophenone derivatives and amines under acidic conditions to produce tetrahydroquinoline intermediates, which are essential in PDE5 inhibitor synthesis.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify:

  • Different alkoxy substituents at the 7-position (e.g., methoxy, ethoxy).

  • Variations in the amine used, including secondary or primary amines.

  • Alternative reaction solvents and temperatures.

This breadth allows coverage of multiple synthetic routes for similar intermediates, impacting a wide range of PDE5 inhibitor manufacturing processes.

Patent landscape overview

Key patent holders and their portfolios

  • Eli Lilly and Company: Holds original claims, with subsequent patents building on this process.

  • Competitors: Patent filings focused on alternative synthetic methods, different intermediates, or formulations targeting PDE5 inhibitors, especially sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil.

Related patents and innovation areas

  • Synthesis methods: Patents that describe alternative routes for tetrahydroquinoline intermediates, such as palladium-catalyzed couplings or novel cyclization techniques.

  • Intermediate protection: Patents covering protective groups and purification strategies to improve yield and purity.

  • Diverse PDE5 inhibitors: Patents covering structurally similar molecules, often overlapping in intermediate synthesis steps.

Patent expiration and freedom to operate

  • The original patent (5,384,113) expired on Jan. 24, 2012, 17 years after issuance.

  • Subsequent patents extending patent life or on specific formulations patent protection beyond original expiration.

  • Patent landscape indicates that competing companies may face freedom-to-operate issues mainly around intermediate synthesis if they rely solely on methods covered by this patent's claims.

Jurisdictional status

  • Filed and granted in the United States. International counterparts exist, especially in the Canada, Europe, and Asia, with varying durations.

  • Roadmaps for legal challenges or patent term extensions should consider jurisdictional differences.

Implications for R&D and patent strategy

  • Companies developing PDE5 inhibitors can design alternative synthetic pathways to circumvent patented processes, such as avoiding the specific intermediates covered here.

  • Patent expiration opens opportunities for generic manufacturing, provided no other active patents cover final compounds or formulations.

  • Patent landscape indicates ongoing innovation around intermediates and synthesis methods, often leading to additional patent protections.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,384,113 protects a specific process for synthesizing tetrahydroquinoline intermediates integral to PDE5 inhibitors.

  • Its broad claims cover various substituents and reaction conditions, influencing generic entry and process development.

  • The patent expired in 2012, but related patents may still provide patent barriers depending on jurisdiction and claim scope.

  • Alternative synthesis methods and different intermediates are actively patented, indicating ongoing innovation in PDE5 inhibitor manufacturing.

  • R&D pathways should consider designing around the patent scope or exploring new intermediates to ensure freedom to operate.

FAQs

Q1: How does Patent 5,384,113 influence current PDE5 inhibitor manufacturing?

A: It initially covered key synthetic processes. Its expiration allows generic synthesis if no other active patents exist in the jurisdiction. Companies may still need to navigate newer patents covering specific intermediates or formulations.

Q2: Can I develop a different synthetic route for tetrahydroquinoline derivatives without infringing this patent?

A: Yes, if the new method does not use the specific steps claimed or if it differs sufficiently in reaction conditions, intermediates, or catalysts.

Q3: Are there patents that extend protection beyond 2012 for similar processes?

A: Yes. Patents filed thereafter, especially for improved intermediates or formulations, may extend overall patent coverage.

Q4: Does this patent cover final PDE5 inhibitor drugs like sildenafil?

A: No. It covers synthesis intermediates and processes, not the active pharmaceutical compounds themselves.

Q5: How should companies approach patent landscape analysis for PDE5 inhibitors?

A: They should identify active patents on intermediates, synthesis processes, formulations, and therapeutic claims, considering national and international jurisdictions for comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,384,113. (1995). Process for preparing tetrahydroquinoline intermediates. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,384,113

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,384,113

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 196428 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2462592 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2113995 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 69231469 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 0600992 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0600992 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.