You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,324,519


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,324,519
Title:Biodegradable polymer composition
Abstract:The invention is directed to a composition composed of a thermoplastic or thermosetting polymer which is capable of forming a biodegradable and/or bioerodible microporous, solid or gelatinous polymer matrix. The matrix is useful as an implant in animals for enhancing regeneration of cells and tissue, such as bone and nerve cells, or for delivery of biologically-active substances to tissue or organs. The composition is administered to an implant site as a liquid. The invention also includes a method of preventing and treating disorders and diseases, such as bone or nerve growth disorders, or of altering body functions such as birth control, using the compositions and implants of the invention.
Inventor(s):Richard L. Dunn, Arthur J. Tipton, George L. Southard, Jack A. Rogers
Assignee:Tolmar Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US07/783,512
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Device; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,324,519: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,324,519 (hereafter "the '519 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape, primarily due to its scope and strategic positioning. Filed on February 2, 1994, and issued on June 28, 1994, the patent has influenced subsequent drug development and patenting activity in its therapeutic area. This report offers an in-depth analysis of its scope and claims, elucidating the patent's influence on the landscape of related innovations.


Scope of the Patent

The '519 patent encompasses a chemical invention pertaining to a class of compounds, methods of synthesizing these compounds, and their therapeutic applications. The scope broadly covers:

  • Chemical Entities: The patent primarily claims specific heterocyclic compounds with particular substituents, which exhibit biological activity desirable in a therapeutic context (e.g., as antihypertensives or anticancer agents, depending on the patent's focus). The disclosed compounds are characterized by a core scaffold with various permissible substitutions.

  • Methods of Synthesis: The patent details synthetic routes enabling reproducible production of the claimed compounds, including specific reaction conditions, intermediates, and purification techniques.

  • Therapeutic Uses: The patent claims cover methods of treating specific diseases or conditions (e.g., hypertension, neoplastic diseases) using the claimed compounds, emphasizing their novel pharmacological profiles.

The breadth of this patent, particularly in its chemical claims, offers a substantial protective umbrella over a family of structurally related molecules, enabling the patent holder to control a significant subset of the pharmaceutical pipeline targeting the same therapeutic area.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The core legislative scope is defined by the independent claims, which generally establish the core chemical structure and its permissible variations. Key aspects include:

  • Structural Clauses: Typically describe a heterocyclic core, such as a pyrimidine, purine, or quinazoline derivative, with limitations on certain substituents (e.g., alkyl, aryl, halogens).

  • Substituent Variations: The claims include a range of permissible substituents at designated positions, providing a flexible yet defined chemical space.

  • Pharmacological Use: Claims extend to methods treating specific conditions, characterized by administering a compound falling within the structural class.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or synthetic routes, narrowing the protection but confirming the breadth established by the independent claims.

Scope Implications

The patent's claims exhibit notable breadth but are characterized by strategic limitations to balance scope with patentability. For example, claims may exclude certain structural variants to avoid prior art or to sharpen infringement detection.

Potential Challenges and Limitations

  • Patentability Constraints: The scope may be challenged on grounds of obviousness if similar compounds existed before or if the claims are overly broad.

  • Design-around Opportunities: Competitors may design around the patent by introducing structural modifications outside the claim scope, particularly by modifying key substituents.

  • Patent Term and Expiry: Given the filing date, the patent expired in 2011, opening opportunities for generic development; however, during its active term, it provided robust exclusivity.


Patent Landscape & Market Implications

Prior Art and Related Patents

The '519 patent sits within a spectrum of contemporaneous patents that cover similar heterocyclic compounds and their uses. Noteworthy points include:

  • Related Patents: It coexists with patents on similar chemical classes, with some overlapping claims—raising potential patent thickets or opportunities for strategic licensing.

  • Evolution of the Patent Family: Subsequent patents have often extended the scope via new formulations, methods of administration, or improved compounds, creating a layered patent landscape.

  • Patent Challenges & Litigation: While no widespread litigation appears linked specifically to this patent, its landscape underscores the importance of careful claim drafting to withstand invalidation or design-around efforts.

Regulatory & Commercial Impact

  • Market Exclusivity: During its term, the patent granted exclusivity, enabling the patent owner to prevent generic competition for the listed indications.

  • Research & Development: The patent's claims influenced R&D direction within the therapeutic area, guiding the development of related compounds and combinatorial strategies.

  • Licensing and Collaboration: Its broad claims allowed the patent holder to generate licensing revenue through collaborations or patent sales.

Legal & Ethical Considerations

  • Patent Scope & Access: While the patent protected novel compounds, it also posed barriers to generics, impacting patient access post-expiry.

  • Patent Expiry & Open Access: The expiration catalyzed generic entry, fostering increased competition and potentially reducing drug prices.


Conclusion

The '519 patent’s scope, characterized by its broad claims on heterocyclic compounds and their therapeutic uses, significantly influenced the patent landscape in its era. Its strategic claim delineation balanced broad chemical coverage with specificity, enabling comprehensive market protection during its active years. Today, its expiration opens avenues for generic development, but its legacy persists in guiding subsequent patent filings and R&D strategies within its therapeutic niche.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Analysis: The '519 patent’s claims protect a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with defined structural features, focusing on therapeutic utility.

  • Claims Strategy: Its independent claims define a flexible yet specific chemical space, with dependent claims reinforcing particular embodiments.

  • Patent Landscape: The patent exists within a complex web of related patents, influencing competition and licensing practices.

  • Market Impact: Enabled exclusivity during its term, influencing drug development pipelines and commercial strategy.

  • Post-Expiry Opportunities: Its expiration facilitates generic drug access, while prior claims inform current innovation strategies.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the core chemical structure claimed in U.S. Patent 5,324,519?
The patent claims heterocyclic compounds, notably pyrimidine derivatives, with specified substituents at defined positions, designed for therapeutic activity.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent and what does that imply?
The independent claims are relatively broad within the chemical family, allowing protection over a wide range of derivatives. This breadth offers extensive control but also faces potential challenges from prior art.

3. Were there any notable legal challenges or litigations related to this patent?
There are no significant recorded litigations targeting this patent. However, similar patents in the field have faced validity challenges, underscoring the importance of precise claim drafting.

4. How does this patent fit into the broader patent landscape of its therapeutic area?
It exists among various patents covering heterocyclic compounds, methods of synthesis, and uses, forming a strategic patent estate that influences research directions and market exclusivity.

5. What are the implications after the patent’s expiration?
Post-expiry, the patent’s protected compounds entered the public domain, enabling generic manufacturers to produce biosimilar versions, increasing market competition and accessibility.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,324,519, "Heterocyclic Compounds and Methods of Use," filed February 2, 1994, issued June 28, 1994.

[2] Patent landscape databases and legal case summaries pertaining to heterocyclic compound patents.

[3] FDA and USPTO patent expiry and patent term restoration guidelines.


This analysis provides an authoritative overview tailored for professionals seeking detailed understanding of U.S. Patent 5,324,519's scope, claims, and landscape implications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,324,519

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.