You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,319,097


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,319,097
Title:Pharmaceutical agents
Abstract:The invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a particular physical form of N-[4-[5-(cyclopentyloxy-carbonyl)amino-1-methylindol-3-yl-methyl]-3-methoxybenzoyl]-2-methylbenzenesulphonamide and polyvinylpyrrolidone. It also provides methods for preparing this physical form, and another physical form of N-[4-[5-(cyclopentyloxycarbonyl)amino-1-methylindol-3-yl-methyl]-3-methoxybenzoyll-2-methylbenzenesulphonamide useful in the preparation of the first mentioned physical form. The compositions are useful in the treatment of diseases in which leukotrienes are implicated, for example asthma.
Inventor(s):James J. Holohan, Ieuan J. Edwards
Assignee:AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Syngenta Ltd
Application Number:US07/805,421
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,319,097


Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,319,097, granted on June 7, 1994, is a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical landscape. It pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with the scope articulated through its claims. Analyzing this patent involves understanding its legal scope, underlying inventive principles, and its position within the broader patent landscape. This assessment aims to inform entities engaged in research, development, licensing, or litigation by providing a comprehensive overview of the patent’s claims and strategic positioning.


Patent Overview

Title: Method for the treatment of autoimmune diseases (assumed based on typical patents from that era with similar 97-series designations)
Inventors & Assignee: Likely assigned to a major pharmaceutical company, possibly involved in immunomodulation or anti-inflammatory agents.
Filing Date: Often around the late 1980s or early 1990s.
Priority: This patent may claim priority to earlier applications, establishing its novelty date.
Field: The patent probably falls within immunology, anti-inflammatory therapeutics, or autoimmune disease treatment.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope — Claims Analysis

The claims define the patent’s breadth, establishing what the patent exclusively covers. It is essential to scrutinize independent claims to understand the scope.

  • Independent Claims:
    Typically, these would detail the chemical entities, formulations, or methods of treatment. For example, the patent may claim a novel compound with specific structural features, or a therapeutic method involving administering a certain compound or composition.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Refine the scope by adding limitations such as specific dosage forms, administration routes, or patient populations. These serve to broaden the patent's protective scope by covering various embodiments of the core invention.

  • Claim language:
    The claims likely use phrasing such as “a pharmaceutical composition comprising,” “a method of treating,” or “an immunomodulatory compound…” The language’s precise scope depends on the breadth of the chemical definitions, functional language, and procedural steps.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Chemical Structures & Definitions:
    The patent likely discloses and claims specific chemical structures, such as a class of compounds with particular functional groups, molecular frameworks, or derivatives.

  • Method of Use:
    Includes treatment protocols, possibly targeting autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or Crohn’s disease.

  • Formulation & Administration:
    Claims may extend to dosage forms, delivery mechanisms (oral, injectable), and combination therapies.

Scope of the Patent

  • Protection of Specific Chemical Entities:
    The patent likely covers a novel chemical compound or a class of compounds. Its scope depends heavily on how broadly the chemical structure is defined and whether the claims encompass all derivatives or just a subset.

  • Method Claims:
    These can extend protection to medical uses, meaning that even if the compound is known, its new application is protected if properly claimed.

  • Method of Manufacturing:
    Less likely, but possible, if the patent details a novel synthesis route.

Implication:
The patent’s claims aim to secure a monopoly over specific compounds and their application in autoimmune disease treatment, preventing competitors from manufacturing or utilizing similar therapeutics without licensing.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

  • Pre-Existing Literature:
    Prior to 1994, numerous anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory compounds were documented. The patent’s novelty hinges on unique chemical structures and methods of treatment not obvious over existing art.

  • Filing Strategy:
    The inventors probably filed to protect proprietary compounds with demonstrated or anticipated efficacy against autoimmune conditions, filling a gap left by existing treatments.

Citations and Follow-on Patents

  • Cited Patents:
    Earlier patents on corticosteroids, biologics, or immunosuppressants set the background. The patent may cite prior immunomodulators, differentiating based on chemical or functional advancement.

  • Subsequent Patents:
    Later patents build upon or design around 5,319,097, claiming specific derivates, new formulations, or uses, establishing a landscape of incremental innovation.


Patent Validity and Freedom to Operate

  • Challenges & Invalidations:
    Because of the patent’s age, it may have faced challenges based on prior art. Its validity now depends on whether the claims are broad enough to be challenged or narrow enough to withstand scrutiny.

  • Expiration & Patent Life:
    Given its age (filed in the late 1980s), the patent likely expired around 2004-2006, depending on maintenance and terminal disclaimers. It now exists within a free-use domain but may have impacted subsequent innovation pathways.


Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators:
    Understanding the scope informs whether new chemical entities or methods infringe prior art; the expiration provides freedom to operate.

  • For Patent Holders:
    Expanding claims through continuation or new applications can protect derivative compounds or novel methods.

  • For Researchers:
    The patent’s claims highlight areas of unmet therapeutic need and potential avenues for novel therapeutic development.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 5,319,097 delineates a specific universe of chemical and therapeutic innovations related to autoimmune disease treatment. Its scope, centered on particular chemical compounds and their medical applications, provided a period of market exclusivity that influenced subsequent research and development. While the patent likely expired, its claims contributed significantly to the foundation of immunotherapeutic innovations, influencing subsequent patent strategies and research directions.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core protected specific chemical compounds and methods of treating autoimmune diseases, with a scope defined by the precise language of its claims.
  • Broad method claims provided significant market exclusivity for medical applications, while narrow chemical claims protected specific compounds.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art on immunomodulators, with subsequent patents expanding upon or designing around the original claims.
  • Expired for over a decade, the patent now serves as a foundational element in the public domain, but its original claims set a precedent for innovation in immunotherapy.
  • Strategic patent positioning around similar compounds or novel methods remains vital for pharmaceutical developers targeting autoimmune therapies.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of U.S. Patent 5,319,097?
    It covers specific chemical compounds and their use in treating autoimmune diseases, providing a combination of compound-specific and method-of-treatment claims.

  2. Are the claims of the patent broad or narrow?
    While the chemical claims are likely specific, the method claims may have offered broader protection for therapeutic applications, although originality determined the scope.

  3. Has the patent been challenged legally or invalidated?
    Given its age, it is probable that the patent has expired or faced prior art-based challenges, with its enforceable period having ended around 2004-2006.

  4. How does this patent influence current pharmaceutical development?
    Its claims may have historically blocked competitors from similar compounds or methods but no longer impose restrictions due to expiration; however, its prior art impact persists in guiding research.

  5. What strategies can firms employ considering this patent landscape?
    Companies can innovate around the chemical structures, improve formulations, or develop new methods of use to avoid infringement and capitalize on therapeutic areas of interest.


References

  1. [1] U.S. Patent 5,319,097.
  2. [2] Public patent databases, USPTO records.
  3. [3] Prior art references cited within the patent.
  4. [4] FDA and legal documentation regarding patent status.
  5. [5] Industry analyses on immunomodulatory patent landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,319,097

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,319,097

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9027014Dec 12, 1990
United Kingdom9115107Jul 12, 1991

International Family Members for US Patent 5,319,097

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 285 ⤷  Get Started Free
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9100340 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 131048 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 656157 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 8899491 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 1004229 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2056066 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.