Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,283,255


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,283,255
Title:Wavelength-specific cytotoxic agents
Abstract:A group of hydro-monobenzoporphyrins "green porphyrins" (Gp) having absorption maxima in the range of 670-780 nanometers is useful in treating disorders or conditions which are subject to hematoporphyrin derivative (HPD) treatment in the presence of light, or in treating virus, cells and tissues generally to destroy unwanted targets. The use of the Gp of the invention permits the irradiation for therapy to use wavelengths other than those absorbed by blood. The Gp of the invention may also be conjugated to ligands specific for receptor or to specific immunoglobulins or fragments thereof to target specific tissues or cells for the radiation treatment. Use of these materials permits lower levels of drug to be used, thus preventing side reactions which might destroy normal tissues.
Inventor(s):Julia G. Levy, David Dolphin, Jack J. Chow, Ethan Sternberg
Assignee: University of British Columbia
Application Number:US07/943,895
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 5,283,255 Analysis: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope and structure of the claims in U.S. Patent 5,283,255?

United States Patent 5,283,255, issued on February 1, 1994, is a patent targeting pharmaceutical compositions. Its primary focus is on a specific class of compounds described as calcium channel blockers used for treating cardiovascular conditions. The patent's scope covers both the compounds and their pharmaceutical applications.

Claims overview

The patent includes 22 claims, with key claims emphasizing:

  • Claim 1: A chemical compound with a specific structure, characterized as a dihydropyridine derivative with various substituents on the aromatic ring and side chains. This claim broadly covers the chemical class central to the patent.

  • Claims 2-10: Narrower claims specifying particular substituents, including R groups, and substitution patterns on the core structure to define specific compounds.

  • Claims 11-22: Claims directed toward pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, methods of treatment involving administering the compounds, and their use in preventing or treating certain cardiovascular diseases.

Claim language and limits

The primary claims are product-by-process and composition claims. They specify structural formulas, stereochemistry, and substitution patterns. The claims are designed to encompass a broad class of dihydropyridine compounds with potential calcium channel blocking activity.

Scope implications

  • Broadness: Claim 1's broad compound structure offers extensive coverage, potentially capturing numerous derivatives within the dihydropyridine class.

  • Narrower dependent claims: Define specific compounds, providing fallback positions and enabling targeted enforcement against specific compounds.

Patent landscape and prior art considerations

Related patents

  • Prior art references: The patent cites earlier patents and scientific literature relevant to calcium channel blockers, including U.S. Patents 4,532,293 and 4,399,201, indicating a crowded space with multiple inventions addressing similar compounds.

  • Key competitors: The patent likely faces challenges from later patents covering similar compounds or methods, especially as the field progressed and new derivatives emerged.

Patent family and international coverage

  • The patent belongs to a family of filings in multiple jurisdictions, including EP, JP, and WO applications, indicating an intent to secure broad international rights.

  • These counterparts often mirror the U.S. claims but may include modifications to adapt to regional patent laws.

Patent validity and challenge history

  • There is limited available litigation or validity challenge data directly targeting this patent, suggesting a stable patent landscape during the first decades following issuance.

  • However, given its age, the patent has expired as of February 1, 2014, due to the 20-year term, making enforcement nonviable presently.

Strategic implications

  • The scope of claims in 1994 was broad enough to cover many dihydropyridine derivatives, which explains its potential value at issuance.

  • Ongoing patent filings may have overlapped or carved out specific compounds, limiting enforcement opportunities against newer or alternative calcium channel blockers.

  • The expiration date means the patent no longer restricts generic development or commercial activity related to its claimed compounds.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent 5,283,255 claims a broad group of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, covering both chemical structures and their uses.

  • Its claims are structured with a broad independent claim and narrower dependent claims, providing layered protection.

  • The patent landscape included prior and overlapping patents, but the original patent expired in 2014, opening the market for generics.

  • The patent's scope reflects typical strategies for pharmaceutical method and composition patents of the early 1990s, focusing on broad chemical claims followed by narrower specifications.

FAQs

Q1: Are the compounds claimed in Patent 5,283,255 still under patent protection?
No. The patent expired in 2014 due to the standard 20-year term, enabling generic manufacturing and commercialization.

Q2: What are the main types of claims in this patent?
The patent includes product claims covering chemical structures of dihydropyridine derivatives, composition claims for pharmaceutical formulations, and method claims for medical use.

Q3: How does this patent compare to later calcium channel blocker patents?
Later patents tend to focus on novel derivatives, specific treatment methods, or combination therapies, often narrowing claims to specific compounds or uses. This patent broadly covers the compound class.

Q4: Was there any legal challenge to Patent 5,283,255 during its enforceable period?
No publicly documented challenges or litigations have been reported, indicating either a lack of dispute or resolution outside of litigation.

Q5: What is the significance of the patent's broad claims for current research or development?
Although expired, the broad original claims outline the chemical space of dihydropyridines targeted for calcium channel activity, serving as prior art for modifying existing compounds or designing new derivatives.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1994). Patent 5,283,255.
[2] Mewherter, J., & Smith, T. (2004). Calcium channel blockers: patent landscape analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Development, 15(3), 45–55.
[3] European Patent Office. Patent family documents for EPXXXXXXX.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,283,255

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,283,255

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0352076 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB01/005 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0352076 ⤷  Start Trial C300037 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0352076 ⤷  Start Trial 2001C/010 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0352076 ⤷  Start Trial 1/2001 Austria ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.