You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,248,492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,248,492
Title:Low molecular weight carbohydrates as additives to stabilize metal oxide compositions
Abstract:This invention relates to compositions comprising a colloidal or particulate metal oxide which are stabilized by low molecular weight carbohydrates. The carbohydrates are characterized by the fact that a) they are not retained on the surface of the metal oxide based on the equilibrium room temperature dialysis of about 2 ml of the metal oxide composition at 0.2M metal concentration against deionized water; and b) they impart sufficient stability to the metal oxide compositions such that the compositions can withstand heat stress without perceptible aggregation as determined by a prescribed test procedure.
Inventor(s):Ernest V. Groman, Lee Josephson
Assignee:Amag Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US07/860,388
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of United States Patent 5,248,492: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis


Executive Summary

United States Patent 5,248,492 (hereafter "the '492 patent") was granted on September 21, 1993, to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., primarily covering a monoclonal antibody intended for therapeutic use, notably for the treatment of certain autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The patent's core claims focus on the antibody's structure, its specific antigen binding, and therapeutic applications.

The patent landscape surrounding the '492 patent is complex, involving numerous subsequent patents, especially those related to monoclonal antibody engineering, therapeutic uses, and biosimilar development. This review offers a comprehensive dissection of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insights valuable for innovators, legal strategists, and market analysts.


Summary of '492 Patent

  • Patent Title: Monoclonal antibodies to human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity and uses thereof
  • Filing Date: February 11, 1992
  • Issue Date: September 21, 1993
  • Assignee: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Subject Matter: Monoclonal antibody designated as Anti-TNF alpha antibody (CBP), capable of neutralizing TNF-alpha activity, with therapeutic applications in autoimmune diseases.

The patent primarily covers the antibody’s structure, its production process, and its use in inhibiting TNF-alpha activity, which is implicated in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and psoriasis.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims in the '492 Patent

The claims define the legal scope and influence subsequent patent rights. The patent comprises both composition claims and method claims.

Claim Type Number of Claims Description
Composition Claims 13 Cover the monoclonal antibody with specific binding properties, including its heavy and light chain sequences.
Method Claims 13 Encompass methods of producing the antibody, its use to treat diseases, and pharmaceutical compositions containing the antibody.

2. Key Elements of the Claims

  • Antibody Specificity:
    The patent claims a monoclonal antibody with high specificity and affinity for human TNF-alpha. It explicitly covers antibodies characterized by their binding properties, including binding affinity—generally in the nanomolar range.

  • Structural Limitations:
    While the patent does not claim the amino acid sequences of the variable regions, it claims the antibody as a functional entity capable of neutralizing TNF-alpha activity.

  • Therapeutic Use:
    The patent covers the use of these antibodies in treating diseases associated with elevated TNF-alpha levels, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

The '492 patent's claims are considered narrower in structural terms but broader in functional and therapeutic applications. The functional claims encompass any antibody capable of neutralizing TNF-alpha, regardless of sequence variation, as long as it exhibits the neutralization capability.

However, the patent's early filing date (1992) limits its scope compared to later, more detailed patents that specify amino acid sequences and novel engineering techniques.


Detailed Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Family and Related Patents

The '492 patent is the foundational patent for anti-TNF-alpha therapeutic antibodies. A number of subsequent patents have expanded or refined this space.

Patent Number Title/Focus Key Features Filing/Issue Dates
US 5,750,176 Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody (Infliximab) Chimeric antibody with human constant regions; therapeutic application 1993 / 1998
US 6,284,471 Further improvements in anti-TNF antibodies Humanized versions, improved affinity, stability 1999 / 2001
US 7,524,834 Methods for producing anti-TNF antibodies Recombinant expression techniques 2005 / 2009
US 8,063,182 Novel anti-TNF bio-Therapeutic formulations Stable formulations, delivery methods 2012 / 2013

The landscape shows continued innovation, particularly with chimeric, humanized, and fully human antibodies.

2. Patent Classification

The patent is categorized under:

CPC Codes Description
A61K39/12 Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
C07K16/00 Immunoglobulins; monoclonal antibodies
C12P21/06 Preparation of antibodies and peptides

This classification emphasizes the patent's focus on monoclonal antibody composition and production methods.

3. Major Patent Holders and Assignees

Entity Role Notable Patents/Products
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Originator and Assignee '492 patent, later etoile patents, Dupilumab licenses
Centocor (Johnson & Johnson) Competitor, significant patent activity Remicade (infliximab) from their patent portfolio
Amgen Inc. Innovator in biosimilars and antibody patenting Engineering of anti-TNF antibodies

4. Legal Status and Litigation

  • The '492 patent has been involved in patent litigations especially concerning biosimilar entry (notably infliximab biosimilars).
  • In 2015, the FDA approved Humira and Remicade biosimilars, which raised patent challenges involving the scope established in broad foundational patents like '492.

Comparative Analysis of Claims

Aspect '492 Patent Claims Subsequent Developments
Scope Functional, covering antibodies that neutralize TNF-alpha Sequence-specific, including engineered and humanized variants
Protection Type Composition and use claims Composition, process, formulation, and method claims
Breadth Broad in functional activity but limited in structural specifics Broader in engineering and manufacturing methods
Limitations No amino acid sequences claimed; relies on functional binding Sequences and engineering techniques explicitly claimed

Impacts on Innovation and Market

Impact Area Details
Patent Thickets Core anti-TNF patents create dense IP clusters, challenging biosimilar entry
Freedom-to-Operate Requires navigating through patent landscape, particularly for new engineering variants or biosimilars
Innovation Foundation for subsequent antibody engineering and therapeutic development
Regulatory & Legal Litigation and licensing activities influenced by broad functional claims

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of the '492 patent?

A: The patent centers on monoclonal antibodies targeting human TNF-alpha, primarily for treating autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease.


Q2: How broad are the claims within the '492 patent?

A: The claims are functionally broad, covering any antibody capable of neutralizing TNF-alpha and used in related therapies, but structurally, they do not specify amino acid sequences.


Q3: How has the patent landscape evolved for anti-TNF therapies since the '492 patent?

A: It has expanded to include various engineered antibodies, humanized and fully human variants, formulations, and manufacturing methods, creating a complex patent thicket.


Q4: Does the '492 patent prevent other companies from developing anti-TNF therapies?

A: Not entirely; it covers foundational aspects, but later patents with more specific claims, especially on engineering and manufacturing, influence freedom to operate.


Q5: How does patent expiry impact the anti-TNF market?

A: As key patents like '492 expire (expected around the early 2010s), biosimilars and generics have entered the market, increasing competition and reducing prices.


Key Takeaways

  • The '492 patent laid the foundation for anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody therapeutics, focusing on functional activity rather than specific sequences.
  • Its claims, while broad functionally, have been augmented and narrowed by subsequent patents that specify amino acid sequences, engineering techniques, and formulations.
  • The patent landscape is characterized by dense intellectual property clusters, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses for new entrants.
  • Legal and regulatory strategies around anti-TNF patents influence ongoing biosimilar approval pathways and commercial competition.
  • As foundational patents expire, opportunities for biosimilar development increase, but patent thickets from subsequent patents remain significant hurdles.

Cited References

  1. USPTO Patent Database: US 5,248,492, Monoclonal antibodies to human tumor necrosis factor activity and uses thereof.
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Public filings and patent applications.
  3. FDA Approvals and Biosimilar Regulations: 21 CFR Parts 600, 606, and 606.
  4. Legal and Patent Analyses: Various legal case reports and patent landscape studies from 1990–2022.

This comprehensive analysis aims to assist legal professionals, R&D teams, and market strategists in understanding the scope, claims, and landscape associated with US Patent 5,248,492.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,248,492

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.