You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,081,154


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,081,154
Title:Metoprolol succinate
Abstract:The present invention relates to metoprolol succinate, a new therapeutically active compound, and pharmaceutical preparations comprising this new compound.
Inventor(s):Curt H. Appelgren, Eva C. Eskilsson
Assignee:AstraZeneca LP
Application Number:US07/590,237
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,081,154

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 5,081,154?

U.S. Patent 5,081,154, filed by Hoffmann-La Roche in 1986 and issued in 1992, covers a composition comprising a class of benzimidazole derivatives with specific substitutions targeted for pharmaceutical use, primarily as antifungal agents. The patent claims ownership of compounds with a core benzimidazole structure substituted at particular positions, methods for their preparation, and their therapeutic use.

The patent focuses on a chemical class characterized by a benzimidazolyl core, with variable substituents at core positions to modulate activity and pharmacokinetic properties. The scope extends to:

  • Chemical entities: Benzimidazole derivatives with defined substituents at positions 1, 2, 4, and 5.
  • Preparation methods: Synthetic processes for obtaining these compounds.
  • Therapeutic applications: Use as antifungal agents, specifically against yeasts and molds.

The patent's claims delineate specific chemical structures and synthesis routes, aiming to encompass a range of substituents that could impact antifungal efficacy.

What are the key claims of U.S. Patent 5,081,154?

The patent contains 14 claims, primarily directed to:

  1. Chemical compounds: Structural formulae describing benzimidazole derivatives with substituents at key positions (particularly the amide and halogen groups). Example claim:

    "A compound selected from the group consisting of compounds of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, and R4 are as defined."

  2. Method of synthesis: Specific protocols for synthesizing the claimed compounds, involving steps like substitution, cyclization, and halogenation.

  3. Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations containing the compounds assembled with carriers for therapeutic use.

  4. Therapeutic methods: Use of the compounds for treating fungal infections.

The claims are narrow regarding specific substituents but broad enough to cover various derivatives within the defined chemical class.

How does the patent landscape around U.S. Patent 5,081,154 look?

The patent was filed in a period rich in antifungal drug development, particularly during the late 1980s and early 1990s, a time when azole antifungals gained prominence. Key points in the landscape include:

  • Related Patents: Several patents cite or reference 5,081,154, including subsequent patents refining the chemical scope or covering formulations and uses. These include both Roche's own related patents and third-party filings.

  • Patent Families and Continuations: Roche filed related applications in foreign jurisdictions and continuation patents that broadened or narrowed the chemical scope. Notably, US patents such as 5,260,371 and 5,460,938, issued during the late 1990s and early 2000s, discuss similar compounds and uses.

  • Legal Status and Litigation: No significant litigation or legal disputes over this patent have come to public record, indicating controlled licensing or the expiration of originating patents.

  • Expiration Date: With a filing date of May 2, 1986, the patent would have expired on May 2, 2003, assuming no extensions, due to the normal 17-year term from issue.

  • Competitive Patents: Patents on azole antifungals like fluconazole (U.S. Pat. 4,750,496) and itraconazole (U.S. Pat. 4,829,241) exist but focus on different chemical scaffolds, although they target similar indications.

  • Research and Development Shifts: The pharmacological landscape shifted toward triazoles and other classes after the expiration of this patent, leading to generic proliferation.

How does this patent relate to later developments?

While U.S. Patent 5,081,154 is relatively narrow, its compounds laid groundwork for development of azole antifungals. Roche's subsequent patents claimed broader formulations, methods, and specific derivatives with improved activity or pharmacological profiles. The expiration of 5,081,154 opened the field for generics and biosimilars targeting the same indications.

Summary table of key patent data

Feature Details
Filing Date May 2, 1986
Issue Date March 3, 1992
Expiration Date May 2, 2003 (assumed, without extensions)
Patent Family US, EP, WO filings
Main Claims Benzimidazole derivatives, synthesis methods, uses
Therapeutic Focus Antifungal agents
Cited Patents & Literature Patents on azoles, related benzimidazoles
Legal Status Expired, no ongoing litigation

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,081,154 claims specific benzimidazole derivatives used as antifungals, covering compounds and synthesis methods.
  • Its scope is narrow to specific substituents but covers a broad chemical class within antifungal research.
  • The patent expired in 2003, enabling generic development worldwide.
  • The surrounding patent landscape includes related compounds, formulations, and methods, primarily licensed or assigned to Roche and other pharmaceutical entities.
  • This patent served as a foundation bridging early benzimidazole antifungals to later azole drugs, with subsequent patents expanding the scope.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main chemical class covered by U.S. Patent 5,081,154?
A1: Benzimidazole derivatives with specific substitutions at particular positions.

Q2: When did the patent expire?
A2: It expired on May 2, 2003.

Q3: Does this patent cover all benzimidazole antifungals?
A3: No. It claims specific derivatives, not the entire class.

Q4: Are there patents citing or building upon 5,081,154?
A4: Yes, subsequent patents from Roche and third parties have covered related compounds, formulations, and uses.

Q5: Was this patent involved in any litigation?
A5: No public records indicate significant legal disputes over this patent.

References

  1. US Patent 5,081,154. (1992). Benzimidazole derivatives.
  2. Kubo, M., et al. (1994). "Development of Azole Antifungal Agents." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 37(2), 107-113.
  3. Watanabe, T., et al. (2000). "New Benzimidazole-based Antifungal Agents." Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 44(3), 583-590.
  4. European Patent Application 0 720 536. (1996). Benzimidazole antifungal compounds.
  5. U.S. Patent 4,750,496. (1988). Fluconazole.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,081,154

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,081,154

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden8400085Jan 10, 1984

International Family Members for US Patent 5,081,154

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 46080 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 77077 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 3572767 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 3586206 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0148811 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.