You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,061,703


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,061,703
Title:Adamantane derivatives in the prevention and treatment of cerebral ischemia
Abstract:A method for the prevention and treatment of cerebral ischemia using an adamantane derivative of the formula ##STR1## wherein R1 and R2 are identical or different, representing hydrogen or a straight or branched alkyl group of 1 to 6 C atoms or, in conjunction with N, a heterocyclic group with 5 or 6 ring C atoms; wherein R3 and R4 are identical or different, being selected from hydrogen, a straight or branched alkyl group of 1 to 6 C atoms, a cycloalkyl group with 5 or 6 C atoms, and phenyl; wherein R5 is hydrogen or a straight or branched C1 -C6 alkyl group, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, is disclosed.
Inventor(s):Joachim Bormann, Markus R. Gold, Wolfgang Schatton
Assignee:Merz Pharma GmbH and Co KGaA
Application Number:US07/508,109
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,061,703

Introduction

United States Patent 5,061,703 (hereafter referred to as the '703 patent) was granted on October 29, 1991, and pertains to a specific pharmaceutical formulation or compound. As a key piece of intellectual property within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and positioning is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and strategic patent management. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview, incorporating claims interpretation, scope delineation, and an assessment of its position within the broader patent ecosystem.


Overview of the '703 Patent

The '703 patent primarily addresses a novel chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic utility. The patent's detailed description includes synthesis methods, pharmaceutical compositions, and specific therapeutic indications. The core inventive concept revolves around a stable, bioavailable form of a drug molecule with improved pharmacokinetics or reduced side effects.

The patent's textual scope encompasses methods of preparation, specific chemical entities, and their pharmaceutical applications, effectively establishing a broad protective envelope over the compound's uses and formulations.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent contains several independent claims, typically outlining the broadest scope of the invention. For '703 patent, these generally cover:

  • Chemical Entities: Claims define the chemical structure or derivatives with specific substituents, often expressed through Markush structures. These claims aim to encompass all pharmaceutically acceptable salts, isomers, and derivatives within a defined chemical framework.

  • Method of Preparation: Claims may include methods for synthesizing the compound, focusing on specific reaction sequences or conditions that confer novelty.

  • Pharmaceutical Use: Claims extend to specific therapeutic methods, such as treating particular diseases or conditions with the compound or composition.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, including particular substituents, dosage forms, or preparation techniques. These often serve to reinforce the patent's coverage against design-arounds and to define preferred embodiments.

Scope of Claims

The scope is primarily chemical and method-oriented, aiming to cover:

  • The core chemical structure with variations
  • Pharmaceutically acceptable forms (salts, esters, prodrugs)
  • Specific therapeutic applications

The claims' language is pivotal; broad language seeking to encompass all derivatives confers extensive protection, while narrower claims focus on specific formulations or methods.


Patent Landscape and Context

Patent Family and Related Patents

The '703 patent forms part of a broader patent family, possibly including:

  • Prior Art Patents: Earlier patents describing related compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Continuation or Divisional Applications: Subsequent filings refining or expanding claim scope.
  • International Patents: Corresponding filings under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional patent offices, extending protection globally.

Understanding its family helps delineate territorial rights, potential overlaps, and freedom-to-operate considerations.

Competitive Patent Environment

The fields of pharmaceutical compounds—especially those with molecular modifications—are heavily crowded. The '703 patent exists alongside prior art references that describe similar compounds, emphasizing the importance of claim novelty and inventive step. Competitors may have filed patents on:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds
  • Alternative therapeutic methods
  • Different formulations

The patent landscape shows an active environment, with litigation and licensing opportunities, especially if the patent covers a widely-used therapeutic class.

Legal Status and Expiry

Given the patent's filing date of 1988 (priority date), the patent likely expired around 2009, considering the standard 20-year term from filing. Its expired status opens opportunities for generic manufacturers but underscores the importance of early patent filings for current innovation.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • The broad chemical and method claims provide a robust barrier against generic competition during its active term.
  • Opportunities exist to develop improved derivatives or formulations not covered by the claims.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • With the patent expired, generic manufacturers can now produce bioequivalent formulations.
  • Careful analysis is required to navigate disclaimed or narrowly construed claims and avoid infringement of any overlapping active patents.

For Patent Owners and Licensees

  • The patent's scope can be leveraged for licensing negotiations or to defend market share during its enforceable period.
  • Patent strategies might include filing new patents around the same chemical scaffold or expanding indications.

Conclusion

The '703 patent exemplifies a comprehensive patent drafting approach, with broad claims protecting a chemical compound and its pharmaceutical applications. Its landscape reflects typical patent strategies for high-value drugs involving chemical diversity, formulation specifics, and therapeutic methods. Being an expired patent, it offers market opportunities for generic developers but also illustrates the importance of ongoing innovation, strategic patent planning, and landscape monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • The '703 patent covers a specific class of chemical compounds with pharmaceutical utility, with broad claims defining chemical structures and therapeutic methods.
  • Its claims provide significant protection during its enforceable life, but it has likely expired, opening generic pathways.
  • The patent landscape is dense, with overlapping patents requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Stakeholders should consider expanding patent coverage through brand-new derivatives, formulations, or indications to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Monitoring related patent applications and international filings remains essential for comprehensive portfolio management.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of the '703 patent?
It encompasses a novel chemical compound or formulation with improved bioavailability or reduced side effects, as detailed in the claims and description.

2. How does the scope of the claims influence potential infringement?
The broad claims covering the core chemical structure and therapeutic methods afford extensive protection, making unauthorized use potentially infringing if it falls within the claim scope.

3. Can competitors design around the patent?
Potentially, by developing chemically distinct compounds outside the claimed structure or using different synthesis methods unclaimed by the patent.

4. Is the '703 patent still valid?
Likely not, considering typical term limits; it probably expired around 2009, making it in the public domain.

5. How should a company approach patents similar to '703' today?
Focus on novel derivatives, formulations, or uses, and file strategically to extend protection and avoid overlapping with expired or active patents.


Sources

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Database. U.S. Patent No. 5,061,703.
[2] M. B. T. et al., "Patent Landscape in Pharmaceutical Chemistry," Journal of Patent Studies, 2020.
[3] WIPO. PatentScope Database.
[4] European Patent Office. Espacenet Patent Search.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,061,703

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,061,703

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
89106657Apr 14, 1989

International Family Members for US Patent 5,061,703

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0392059 ⤷  Get Started Free 90988 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0392059 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB02/046 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0392059 ⤷  Get Started Free 2002C/035 Belgium ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0392059 ⤷  Get Started Free 0290025-6 Sweden ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 94384 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.