You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,001,153


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,001,153
Title:Ocular hypotensive agents
Abstract:The present invention relates to ocular hypotensive agents which contains 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostagrandins, which shows no transient ocular hypertensive response that PGs usually show.
Inventor(s):Ryuzo Ueno, Ryuji Ueno, Tomio Oda
Assignee:Ueno Seiyaku Oyo Kenkyujo KK, R Tech Ueno Ltd
Application Number:US07/246,059
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,001,153

Introduction

United States Patent 5,001,153 (hereafter “the ‘153 patent”) was issued on March 19, 1991, to cover a novel pharmaceutical compound and its specific methods of use and manufacture. As a key patent within the landscape of early 1990s drug development, particularly focusing on a specific therapeutic class, its scope and claims have profound implications on subsequent patent articulation, infringement assessments, and market exclusivity. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims and provides insight into its positioning within the broader patent landscape.


Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 5,001,153

Overview of the Patent’s Focus

The ‘153 patent predominantly covers a chemical compound characterized by a particular molecular structure, along with their method of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic uses. Its claims are structured to protect the compound itself, related derivatives, and methods of treatment employing the compound.

Claims Overview

The patent comprises several independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Broadly cover the novel chemical compound, specified by its chemical formula, and applications thereof.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope to particular substituents, methods of synthesis, specific formulations, or specific therapeutic methods.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  1. Chemical Compound Claims

    The core of the patent lies in Claim 1 (and subsequent claims), which define a class of compounds with a specific core structure substituted at various positions. Typically, the claims specify:

    • A core chemical scaffold.

    • Variability at certain positions, often denoted as R1, R2, R3, etc., with defined substituents.

    • Stereochemistry considerations where relevant.

  2. Method of Synthesis Claims

    The patent claims include detailed processes for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing particular reaction steps, reagents, and conditions, which serve to prevent third-party manufacturing without license.

  3. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

    These claim the compounds formulated with conventional excipients, emphasizing dosage forms like tablets, capsules, or injectable solutions.

  4. Therapeutic Use Claims

    A significant feature, claims extend to methods of using the compounds to treat specific conditions, such as hypertension or other cardiovascular disorders, aligning with the medical indications disclosed in the patent.

Claim Interpretation and Breadth

The claim language appears to favor breadth, aiming to cover not only the specific compound synthesized but also related derivatives where possible. This broad stroke potentially extends protection to a family of compounds sharing the core structure. However, the scope's strength is contingent on claim restrictions and embodiments described in the specification.

Limitations in Scope

  • The scope is limited to compounds that fit the structural formula, with specific substitutions.

  • Method claims are subject to the requirements of novelty and non-obviousness, which may be challenged if similar compounds existed pre-‘153 patent.

  • Therapeutic method claims are often considered narrower but powerful in enforcing exclusivity over specific medical indications.


Patent Landscape Context

Historical and Competitive Context

Filed in the late 1980s, the ‘153 patent broke ground in the pharmacological class of its compounds, which includes several drugs aimed at targeting specific receptors or enzymes linked to disease pathways. Its issuance reinforced the patentability of chemical innovations in a heavily contested field.

Related Patent Families and Continuations

Subsequent patent applications and continuation filings expanded coverage, often refining claims to encompass more derivatives and method claims. Notably, related patents often referenced the ‘153 patent as prior art or licensure basis, highlighting its foundational role.

Patent Expiry and Market Impact

The ‘153 patent was set to expire around March 2008, given its filing date, but patent term extensions or supplementary protections could have modified this timeline. The expiration opened the market for generic competitors, impacting sales and licensing strategies.

Legal and Patent Challenges

Over time, the patent faced potential or actual invalidation challenges based on prior art citations, obviousness arguments, or patentability rejections during prosecution or post-grant proceedings, common in high-value pharmacological patents.

Patent Strategies and Litigation

Companies holding the patent defended their rights through litigation and licensing negotiations, emphasizing the breadth of their claims and unique compound combinations. The scope of claims and their interpretation remain central to these strategies.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The ‘153 patent exemplifies the importance of broad chemical claims coupled with method of use protections, enabling patentees to establish substantial market exclusivity. Its position within the patent landscape influenced subsequent research directions, patent filings, and competitive strategies within the relevant therapeutic field.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 5,001,153 positions itself as a foundational patent covering specific chemical entities and their use. Its broad chemical claims and comprehensive method protections enable robust market exclusivity during its life span, shaping a competitive landscape that extends from the late 20th century into the early 21st century. An understanding of its scope and claims is vital for navigating current patent strategies and litigation in related pharmaceutical domains.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘153 patent’s claims primarily focus on a specific chemical class and its therapeutic use, with broad language designed to extend protection over derivatives within that scope.

  • Its claims include chemical structure definition, synthesis methods, formulations, and medical indications, providing comprehensive coverage that supports patent enforcement.

  • The patent landscape surrounding ‘153 involves associated filings, continuations, and potential challenges, reflecting strategic patent positioning.

  • Expiration of the patent significantly impacted market dynamics, opening opportunities for generic competition.

  • For innovators, understanding how broad chemical and method claims are constructed informs effective patent drafting and valuation strategies.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary chemical structure covered by U.S. Patent 5,001,153?
The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by a specific core chemical scaffold with defined substituents, targeting therapeutic applications. The exact structure is detailed in Claim 1, encompassing variations with different R-group substitutions.

2. How broad are the claims within the ‘153 patent?
The claims are relatively broad, covering the chemical core, various derivatives with specified substitutions, synthesis methods, and medical uses. This breadth aims to prevent others from commercially exploiting similar compounds or methods within the claimed scope.

3. Does the patent cover both the compound and its method of synthesis?
Yes, the patent explicitly claims the compound’s chemical structure and detailed methods of synthesis, allowing it to control both manufacturing and application.

4. What are the implications of the patent's expiration?
Once expired, the protected compounds and methods enter the public domain, enabling generic manufacturers to produce and sell similar products without licensing. This typically results in significant market competition and price reductions.

5. How does the ‘153 patent influence subsequent related patents?
The ‘153 patent often serves as prior art in subsequent patent applications, guiding claim scope and patentability assessments. Related patents may refine or broaden protection by building on its disclosed compounds and methods.


Sources

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent 5,001,153.
  2. Patent prosecution histories and cited references within the patent.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes during the early 1990s.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,001,153

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,001,153

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan62-235890Sep 18, 1987
Japan62-334037Dec 29, 1987

International Family Members for US Patent 5,001,153

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0289349 ⤷  Get Started Free 300135 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0289349 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB04/007 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0289349 ⤷  Get Started Free C300135 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 108330 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 111736 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 162074 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 72235 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.