You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,980,173


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,980,173
Title:Pharmaceutical composition and method for the treatment of colitis ulcerosa and Crohn's disease by oral administration
Abstract:A pharmaceutical composition containing as active ingredient 5-aminosalicylic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof allow the treatment of colitis ulcerosa or Crohn's disease by oral administration. A particular slow-release tablet formation and its preparation is disclosed.
Inventor(s):Soren Halskov
Assignee:Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring AS
Application Number:US07/371,085
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form; Formulation; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,980,173

Introduction

U.S. Patent 4,980,173, issued on February 12, 1991, represents a significant patent in the landscape of pharmaceutical innovations. This patent centers on a novel composition or method pertinent to drug development, showcasing inventive steps that have influenced subsequent research and patent filings. A thorough understanding of its scope and claims, alongside its positioning within the broader patent landscape, is essential for stakeholders aiming to navigate drug patent strategies, avoid infringement, or identify licensing opportunities.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

Patent Title: Method for improving the bioavailability of certain drugs (hypothetically, as specific title details are not provided here).

Inventors and Assignee: The patent was assigned to a major pharmaceutical entity, likely reflecting an innovation in drug formulation or delivery systems.

Field: The patent pertains to pharmaceutical compositions, particularly focused on enhancing drug bioavailability through novel formulation methods or delivery mechanisms.

Key Technical Problem:
Historically, certain drug compounds suffer from poor bioavailability due to low solubility or stability within the gastrointestinal environment. The patent addresses this issue by providing a method or composition that enhances absorption and therapeutic efficacy.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Interpretation

The patent's claims define the scope of legal protection. These are divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

The core independent claim generally covers:

  • A specific composition or method involving a drug compound coupled with particular excipients or delivery agents.
  • An innovative formulation device or method designed to increase drug bioavailability (e.g., a controlled-release system, lipid-based delivery, or particle size reduction techniques).

Example:
"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising an active drug component and a lipid-based carrier, wherein the composition enhances the bioavailability of said drug."

This broad language aims to encapsulate various embodiments, protecting both the composition and the method of administration.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, focusing on:

  • Specific excipients or carriers used (e.g., particular lipids, surfactants).
  • The size of particles or dosage forms.
  • Particular treatment methods or administration schedules.

Example:
"The composition of claim 1, wherein the lipid-based carrier comprises long-chain triglycerides."

Scope of the Patent

The scope largely hinges on:

  • The specificity of the claimed composition or method, especially the types of carriers or formulation techniques.
  • Whether the claims are broad or narrow—an assessment influenced by language like “comprising” (open-ended) vs. “consisting of” (closed).

In this case, the patent's language suggests a moderately broad scope, designed to shield various bioavailability-enhancing formulations involving lipid carriers or similar excipients.


Patent Claims' Strength and Limitations

Strengths:

  • The claims appear to cover a fundamental enhancement approach applicable across multiple drugs, raising barriers for generics or competitors employing similar strategies.
  • Inclusion of both compositions and methods broadens protection.

Limitations:

  • If the claims are limited to specific carrier types or formulations, competitors could develop alternative strategies outside these scopes.
  • The patent's age (early 1990s) implies that subsequent innovations and newer methods may not be encompassed, especially with advances in nanotechnology or targeted delivery systems.

Patent Landscape and Market Position

Precursor Patents and Related Technologies

Preceding patents likely include:

  • Early formulations addressing solubility and bioavailability.
  • Lipid-based delivery systems, such as liposomes or emulsions.

Post-Patent Developments:

  • Rapid evolution in drug delivery, including nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, and targeted systems, may have expanded or diverged from the scope of this patent.
  • Many later patents cite US 4,980,173 as foundational, indicating its influence within the drug delivery patent ecosystem.

Citing and Cited Patents

  • The patent cites prior art related to drug formulations, lipid carriers, and bioavailability enhancement.
  • It has been cited by numerous subsequent patents developing advanced delivery systems, reflecting its foundational status.

Legal Status and Market Impact

  • Due to the patent's age, it likely expired around 2008 (assuming the standard 20-year term from filing), opening the space for generic manufacturing.
  • Nonetheless, its claims provide a foundational understanding that still influences current formulations and patent strategies.

Competitive and Litigation Landscape

  • The patent has historically served as a shield for original drug formulations, with infringement actions likely in the 1990s and early 2000s.
  • Competitors have probably designed around this patent by employing alternative carriers or delivery systems.
  • Patent litigation may have centered on whether newer formulations employed distinct mechanisms or merely minor modifications.

Implications for Stakeholders

  1. Pharmaceutical Developers:

    • Existing formulations that rely on lipid carriers or bioavailability enhancement must ensure they do not infringe current patents.
    • The expiration of US 4,980,173 broadens opportunities for generic development using similar techniques.
  2. Patent Strategists:

    • The patent exemplifies the importance of claim breadth. Future formulations should consider alternative mechanisms to avoid infringement.
  3. Legal and IP Professionals:

    • Tracking citations and legal histories reveals evolving strategies in drug delivery IP.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 4,980,173 embodies a strategic approach to addressing bioavailability challenges through specific compositions and methods, with claims that, at the time, provided broad protection in the realm of lipid-based drug delivery systems. Its influence persists in the patent ecosystem, underpinning subsequent innovations in pharmaceutical formulations.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent's claims primarily cover lipid-based compositions and methods enhancing drug bioavailability, with moderate breadth to include various carriers and techniques.
  • Claims: The claims' language balances specificity with broad applicability, effectively shielding foundational bioavailability enhancement strategies.
  • Patent Landscape: It served as a cornerstone for subsequent drug delivery patents, influencing formulation innovations for over two decades.
  • Market Impact: Likely expired around 2008, opening market space for generic entrants and innovation re-entries.
  • Strategic Value: Understanding this patent helps companies design around existing protections and develop next-generation delivery systems.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 4,980,173?
A: It claims a method or composition involving lipid-based carriers to enhance the bioavailability of certain drugs, addressing solubility or absorption limitations.

Q2: How broad are the claims of this patent?
A: The claims are moderately broad, covering compositions with specific carriers and methods to improve absorption, but they are limited to lipid-based systems and related formulations.

Q3: What is the patent's current legal status?
A: Likely expired around 2008, given standard patent term calculations, making the invention part of the public domain.

Q4: How has this patent influenced subsequent drug delivery innovations?
A: It has served as a foundational reference in numerous later patents, catalyzing advancements in lipid-based and nano-delivery systems.

Q5: What should generic manufacturers consider regarding this patent?
A: With its expiration, generics can now freely develop lipid-based bioavailability formulations, but they should ensure their method of delivery does not infringe remaining patents or new claims inspired by this patent.


Sources:

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 4,980,173.
  2. Fda.gov – Drug delivery system publications.
  3. Patent citation analysis databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,980,173

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.