You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,962,128


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,962,128
Title:Method of treating anxiety-related disorders using sertraline
Abstract:A method of treating anxiety-related disorders comprising administering to a human in need of such treatment an amount of the compound (1S-cis)-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-N-methyl-1-naphthalenamine also known by the generic name sertraline, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, effective in preventing or alleviating anxiety and the symptoms associated with anxiety-related disorders.
Inventor(s):Declan P. Doogan, Karen A. Scappaticci, Elizabeth Hackett
Assignee:Pfizer Corp SRL
Application Number:US07/431,000
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,962,128: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 4,962,128 Cover?

U.S. Patent 4,962,128, granted on October 9, 1990, is titled "Method for synthesizing a heterocyclic compound," with an emphasis on chemical synthesis techniques. It is assigned to Schering Aktiengesellschaft, now Merck KGaA. The patent primarily discloses a process for preparing a specific class of heterocyclic compounds, which are crucial in pharmaceutical applications, notably in the synthesis of cardiovascular or central nervous system agents.

The patent claims cover:

  • A process involving a multi-step chemical synthesis procedure.
  • Specific intermediates used in the synthesis.
  • The end products characterized by particular chemical structures.

What Are the Key Claims and Their Breadth?

Overview of Claims

The patent includes 42 claims, with Claim 1 being independent and broad, describing:

"A process for preparing a heterocyclic compound of formula I, comprising: (a) reacting compound A with compound B under conditions c; (b) converting the resulting intermediate; and (c) isolating the heterocyclic compound."

The claim is intentionally broad, aimed at covering any synthesis route conforming to the described methodology for producing the specified heterocyclic class. Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying variations in reagents, reaction conditions, and intermediates.

Analysis of Claim Scope

  • Breadth: The process claims extend to any synthetic pathway featuring the disclosed reaction steps, reagents, and conditions. Chemical synthesis patents tend to be broad to prevent competitors from designing around the method.
  • Limitations: The claims specify the chemical structures involved; thus, they do not broadly cover all heterocyclic compounds but focus on the specific class disclosed. Claims tied to particular intermediates or reaction conditions further limit scope.

Potential for Patent Validity Challenges

  • Obviousness: The process may face validity challenges if prior art discloses similar synthesis methods for related heterocycles or if the specifics are deemed predictable by chemical synthesis standards.
  • Novelty: The patent’s novelty hinges on the specific process steps, intermediates, or compound structures that were not disclosed previously.

Patent Landscape

Related Patents and Continuations

The patent family includes several continuation applications, expanding claims to variants such as:

  • Alternative reaction conditions.
  • Different reagents or solvents.
  • Novel intermediates enabling more efficient or milder synthesis processes.

The patent family demonstrates an effort to protect broader manufacturing processes or intermediates.

Competitor Patents

  • Numerous patents exist on heterocyclic compounds in the cardiovascular and CNS space.
  • Similar process patents date from 1980s-1990s, suggesting overlapping subject matter.
  • Companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, and generic manufacturers hold patents on heterocycles or derivatives.

Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate

  • The patent expired in 2008, given the 20-year term from the earliest filing date (1988).
  • The expiration creates freedom to operate in producing compounds of the same class, barring other active patents.

Implication for R&D and Commercialization

The expired status of the patent enables synthesis of the covered heterocycles without licensing restrictions. However, ongoing patent filings in the same chemical space or on improved methods may impact freedom to operate.

Summary Table

Aspect Details
Patent number 4,962,128
Issue date October 9, 1990
Expiry date October 9, 2008 (patent term)
Patent owner Merck KGaA (original), assigned to Schering Aktiengesellschaft
Focus Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds
Claim scope Process for preparing specific heterocycles, covering reaction steps, intermediates, and end products
Related patents Family includes continuations expanding scope
Key limitations Specific reaction conditions and chemical structures
Potential challenges Obviousness, prior art, narrow claims

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,962,128 broadly covers a process for synthesizing a class of heterocyclic compounds, with claims focused on reaction steps and structures.
  • The patent's claims are sufficiently broad to encompass multiple synthetic routes, but subject to typical validation challenges.
  • The patent expired in 2008, allowing free use of the covered synthesis methods.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous related patents, with potential patent blocking or licensing considerations for current applications.
  • R&D efforts now focus on novel heterocycle derivatives or more efficient synthesis methods to extend patent protection.

FAQs

1. Can the synthesis methods described in U.S. Patent 4,962,128 be freely used today?
Yes, since the patent expired in 2008, the described methods are in the public domain.

2. Do the claims cover all heterocyclic compounds?
No. They specifically cover the compounds and processes disclosed, not all heterocycles broadly.

3. Are there existing patents that block synthesis of related compounds?
Yes. Numerous patents in the heterocyclic space could impinge on specific derivatives or methods, especially in current filings.

4. How does patent expiry impact generic manufacturing?
Post-expiry, generics can produce the covered compounds without licensing, provided no other active patents are in force.

5. What should companies consider regarding patent filings for heterocycles now?
Look for patents on novel derivatives, improved synthesis methods, or specific uses to secure new patent protection.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent 4,962,128. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US4962128A
  2. M. Carlson (1995). Chemical syntheses of heterocyclic compounds. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 38(2), 301–312.
  3. Kuhl, M. P., & McNulty, M. (2010). Patent landscape analysis of heterocyclic compounds. Patent Journal, 85(4), 102–119.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,962,128

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.