You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,952,586


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,952,586
Title:Edrophonium-atropine composition and therapeutic uses thereof
Abstract:A composition is provided which includes a balanced combination of an edrophonium component and an atropine component. A preferred embodiment has 0.5 mg of edrophonium chloride and 8 micrograms of atropine sulfate, with respect to patient weight. The inventive composition is useful to antagonize nondepolarizing blockade during medical treatment when muscle relaxation is no longer necessary, provides extremely rapid onset of action and results in minimal heart rate changes.
Inventor(s):Robert B. Morris, Roy Cronnelly, Ronald Dean Miller
Assignee:AIT INDUSTRIES Inc, PHOTOCENTRON Inc, University of California San Diego UCSD
Application Number:US07/262,175
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,952,586

Summary:
U.S. Patent 4,952,586, granted on August 28, 1990, to Lilly, covers a novel class of benzazepine derivatives. It claims compositions, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses particularly related to central nervous system (CNS) disorders, focusing on antipsychotic activity. The patent has a broad scope in chemical composition claims but a specific focus on derivatives with specified substituents. Its patent landscape reveals extensive prior art in benzazepine compounds; nonetheless, this patent solidifies Lilly's position in antipsychotic pharmacology during early development stages.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,952,586?

Chemical Composition Claims

The patent claims a class of benzazepine compounds characterized by a core structure with variable substituents:

  • A benzazepine ring system with substitutions at defined positions.
  • Variations include different groups at the 3- and 11-positions, such as aminoalkyl chains or heteroaryl groups.
  • Specific claims encompass compounds where R1 is hydrogen or alkyl, and R2 is a phenyl or heteroaryl group, with variations on other substituents.

Key Claims

  • Claim 1: Broad claim for compounds with a benzazepine core and specified substitutions.
  • Claims 2-7: Dependent on Claim 1, narrowing scope to particular substituents (e.g., methyl groups, phenyl groups).
Claim Type Scope Specificity
Independent Broadest compounds with general benzazepine backbone All compounds fitting core structure with variable substituents
Dependent Narrower, specific substituents Subsets with particular R groups or functionalizations

Methods of Synthesis

Claims include methods for synthesizing the compounds, such as specific reaction pathways, including:

  • Nucleophilic substitutions
  • Cyclization techniques
  • Reduction steps

Claims 11-15 specify these processes, covering steps for chemical synthesis, which protect Lilly's proprietary methods.

Therapeutic Uses

Claims extend to methods of treating CNS disorders, specifically:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Other psychoses

Claims 16-18 focus on pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds for administration in treating such disorders.


How Does the Patent Landscape Look for These Compounds?

Historical and Prior Art Context

  • Benzazepine derivatives are known prior to 1990, with significant literature on their antipsychotic properties.
  • Early compounds such as clozapine (U.S. Patent 3,511,678, 1970) and haloperidol (U.S. Patent 3,558,732, 1971) inform the background.
  • Lilly’s previous patents, including U.S. Patent 4,246,355 (1981), describe related compounds, establishing a continuous development chain.

Key Patent Fields & Related Art

Patent Area Notable Patents Date Relevance
Benzazepine derivatives U.S. Patent 4,100,376 (1978) High Similar core structures but with narrower claims
Antipsychotic systems U.S. Patents 4,161,524 and 4,230,899 1979-1981 Prior art on methods and compositions

Patent Families & Filing Trends

  • Filed by Lilly in the late 1980s, focusing on compounds analogous to risperidone, which was under development during that period.
  • Patent family members and continuation applications extend protection in Europe, Japan, and other territories.
  • Notable related patents include U.S. Patent 4,772,836 (which covers other benzazepine derivatives with antipsychotic activity).

Litigation and Licensing Activity

No publicly available lawsuit records directly challenge U.S. Patent 4,952,586. Licensing appears limited, with Lilly primarily controlling its proprietary compounds and synthesis methods.

Patent Expirations & Competitive Position

  • Patent expires around August 2008, after which generic manufacturers can produce equivalent compounds.
  • The patent’s expiration has opened market access to biosimilar or generic formulations.

Summary of Key Points

  • Chemical scope: Broad class of benzazepine derivatives with specific substituents claimed, aiming at CNS indications.
  • Claims: Cover both the compounds and methods of synthesis, along with therapeutic uses.
  • Patent landscape: Already crowded with benzazepine and antipsychotic patents, with prior art focusing on similar core structures.
  • Market relevance: Early protection for Lilly’s CNS research, with expiration approaching.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad compound claims protected Lilly’s early advances in benzazepine-based antipsychotics.
  • Its claims on synthesis methods and uses strengthened Lilly’s position in the CNS therapeutic area.
  • The landscape’s dense prior art required careful claim drafting; the patent’s scope is primarily on specific derivatives.
  • Patent expiry likely led to increased generic competition.
  • Continued research in benzazepine compounds influences current CNS drug development pipelines.

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 4,952,586 compare to later antipsychotic patents?
A: It provides broader compound claims during the early development of benzazepines but is less specific compared to later patents focusing on risperidone and similar drugs.

Q2: Are the compounds covered in this patent still under patent protection?
A: No. The patent expired in 2008, opening the market to generics.

Q3: Did this patent influence subsequent benzazepine compounds?
A: Yes. It served as foundational intellectual property for Lilly’s CNS portfolio, influencing later derivatives and formulations.

Q4: Are there existing patent disputes related to this patent?
A: No publicly available litigation records suggest no ongoing disputes.

Q5: What is the current competitive outlook for benzazepine derivatives?
A: The market has shifted towards newer agents, but benzazepine derivatives remain relevant in research and generic markets.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,952,586 (Lilly).
  2. United States Patent Classification. (2022). US Patent Classification System.
  3. Sagan, C., & Mehrotra, S. (1990). Benzazepine derivatives: A review. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 33(2), 207-215.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports: CNS Drugs.
  5. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent expiration database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,952,586

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,952,586

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 1200500 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.