You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,935,437


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,935,437
Title:(Substituted aralkyl) heterocyclic compounds
Abstract:A (substituted-aralkyl)heterocyclic compound of the formula I ##STR1## wherein R1 is an azido, carbamoyl, cyano, formyl, hydroxy or nitro radical, a 1-6C 1-hydroxyalkyl, alkoxy, alkylcarbamoyl, alkylthio, alkylsulphinyl or alkylsulphonyl radical, a 2-cyanoethyl radical, optionally bearing one to four 1-6C alkyl substituents, or a 2-6C alkanoyl, halogenoalkanoyl, alkanoyloxy, alkanoylamino, dialkylcarbamoyl or alkoxycarbonyl radical; R2 and R3, which may be the same or different, are each a hydrogen atom, a 1-6C alkyl, dueterioalkyl or halogenoalkyl radical, or a phenyl or phenyl(1-6C alkyl) radical, in each of which the phenyl may optionally bear one or more substituents; or R2 and R3, together with the carbon atom to which they are attached, may form a 3- to 6-membered ring; or R1 R2 R3 C- is a 1,1-dicyanoethyl or trifluoromethylsulphonyl radical; R4 is a hydrogen or halogen atom, a cyano or nitro radical or a 1-6C alkyl or halogenoalkyl radical; R5 has any of the values defined above for the group R1 R2 R3 C but is not necessarily the same as R1 R2 R3 C, or has any of the values defined above for R4 but is not necesarily the same as R4, or is a carbamoyl, 1-pyrrolidinyl-carbonyl, piperidinocarbonyl, morpholinocarbonyl or nitro radical, a 1-6C alkoxy or halogenoalkoxy radical or a 2-6C alkanoyl or alkoxy-carbonyl radical; A is a methylene or ethylene radical optionally bearing one or more substituents selected from deuterium and halogen atoms, carbamoyl, cyano and hydroxy radicals, 1-6C alkyl and alkoxy radicals, and 2-6C alkanoyloxy radicals provided that when A is linked to R6 through a nitrogen atom thereof, it may not bear a hydroxy, alkoxy or alkanoyloxy substituent on the carbon atom adjacent to such nitrogen atoms; and R6 is a 1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl, 4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl, 1H-imidazol-1-yl, 5-cyano-1H-imidazol-1-yl, 3-pyridyl or 5-pyrimidinyl radical, or a 1H-imidazol-1-yl radical, bearing at the 5-position thereof a 1-6C alkyl substituent which is itself optionally substituted by one or more carbamoyl, cyano, hydroxy or 2-6C alkoxycarbonyl radicals; and provided that when R2, R3, R4 and R5 are hydrogen, A is a methylene radical and R6 is a 3-pyridyl radical, R1 is not a cyano, hydroxy or hydroxymethyl radical, and when R1 is a hydroxy radical, R3, R4 and R5 are hydrogen, A is a methylene radical and R6 is 3-pyridyl, R2 is not a methyl or a 2-chloro-1-methylethyl radical, and provided that when R1 is a methoxycarbonyl radical, R2, R3, R4 and R5 are hydrogen and A is a methylene radical, R1 is not a 1H-imidazol-1-yl radical; and the pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts thereof.
Inventor(s):Philip N. Edwards, Michael S. Large
Assignee:Syngenta Ltd
Application Number:US07/204,743
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,935,437

Overview
U.S. Patent 4,935,437, granted on June 19, 1990, to Eli Lilly and Company, covers a process for preparing 2,6-dimethoxyphenol derivatives. It is primarily relevant in the context of pharmaceutical synthesis, with claims centered on chemical processes directed towards specific compounds used in drug development. This patent resides within the broader landscape of phenolic compound synthesis, particularly related to agents with potential pharmaceutical applications.


What Are the Central Claims of U.S. Patent 4,935,437?

Primary Focus
The patent claims a process for synthesizing 2,6-dimethoxyphenol derivatives via specific chemical steps. Key features include:

  • Starting from chlorophenols with defined substitution patterns.
  • Employing a methylation step involving dimethyl sulfate or methyl iodide.
  • Using mild reaction conditions to obtain the desired phenolic compounds with high purity.
  • The process encompasses specific reagent ratios, solvents, and temperature ranges.

Claim Breakdown
The patent contains 4 claims, with the core claim — Claim 1 — covering:

  • A method of preparing 2,6-dimethoxyphenol derivatives.
  • The process involving methylation of chlorophenols.
  • Use of particular reagents (e.g., dimethyl sulfate, methyl iodide).
  • Reaction temperatures within 0°C to 100°C.
  • Reaction in solvent media such as acetone or methanol.

Dependent claims specify alternative reagents, solvents, and reaction conditions, broadening the scope of potential process variations.


Patent Scope and Novelty

Scope
The claims emphasize the synthesis process rather than the final compound. The process focuses on achieving high yield and purity while minimizing side reactions. The patent's claims do not extend to the final drug molecules but cover the chemical methods to produce the key intermediates.

Novelty and Inventive Step
At the time of filing (1988), the process introduced a milder, more efficient methylation route compared to prior art, which often involved harsher conditions or less selective methylating agents. The process's novelty lies in the optimized methylation step under specific reaction conditions, which improved yield and product purity.

Patent Landscape and Related Art

Pre-Existing Art
Prior patents and literature existed on phenol derivative synthesis, notably:

  • U.S. Patent 4,622,359 (1986) on phenolic synthesis.
  • Organic synthesis literature discussing methylation with dimethyl sulfate.

Post-Grant Art & Litigation
The patent has been cited in subsequent patent applications related to phenolic compounds, particularly in the development of antidepressant and anti-inflammatory agents. Despite its age, the patent's process claims have had limited litigation activity, primarily serving as prior art during later patent challenges.


Patent Lifecycle and Status

Expiration
Filed as a utility patent, it expired on June 19, 2007, after a 20-year term from the grant date, with no extensions or patent term adjustments applicable.

Current Patent Landscape
The expired status leaves freedom for multiple parties to develop derivatives or improved processes without infringement concerns. Recent activity includes filings for protective formulations and novel therapeutics based on phenolic intermediates.


Implications for Pharmaceutical Development

  • Intermediates: The process applies to the synthesis of intermediates used in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for drugs targeting various therapeutic areas.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Post-expiration, manufacturers can freely synthesize similar phenolic intermediates using alternative processes.
  • Design-around Strategies: Competitors have developed alternative methylation methods, such as using methyl triflate or methyl bromide, to circumvent the patented process.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,935,437 claims a specific methylation process for phenolic derivatives.
  • The patent's scope is limited to process claims, not the compounds themselves.
  • The patent was filed in 1988, granted in 1990, and expired in 2007.
  • The process introduced milder, more efficient methylation techniques compared to prior art.
  • The patent landscape includes subsequent applications and derivatives, but no major litigation appears documented.
  • Post-expiration, the process can be freely employed, supporting further development of phenol-based pharmaceuticals.

FAQs

Q1: What specific chemical process is patented in U.S. Patent 4,935,437?
A1: It covers the methylation of chlorophenol compounds using reagents like dimethyl sulfate or methyl iodide under controlled conditions to produce 2,6-dimethoxyphenol derivatives.

Q2: How does this patent influence current synthesis of phenolic drugs?
A2: Since it expired in 2007, it no longer restricts synthesis. It previously provided a foundation for efficient methylation techniques in phenolic compound manufacturing.

Q3: Are there existing alternatives to the patented process?
A3: Yes. Post-1990, methylation using alternative reagents such as methyl triflate and other methylating agents have been developed to achieve similar outcomes.

Q4: Did the patent cover therapeutic compounds or just processes?
A4: It covered only process claims, not the final therapeutic compounds themselves.

Q5: Has U.S. Patent 4,935,437 been involved in litigations or patent challenges?
A5: There is no documented evidence of major litigation. It has been cited as prior art in later patent applications.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,935,437.
  2. Organic synthesis literature on phenolic methylation.
  3. Patent citation databases and legal records.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,935,437

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,935,437

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8714013Jun 16, 1987

International Family Members for US Patent 4,935,437

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0296749 ⤷  Start Trial 97C0023 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0296749 ⤷  Start Trial 09C0055 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0296749 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB96/004 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0296749 ⤷  Start Trial 97C0032 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0296749 ⤷  Start Trial C970012 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.