Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,923,892


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,923,892
Title:Tricyclic aromatic compounds
Abstract:The present invention relates to compounds of formula I ##STR1## or a salt, ester or amide thereof; wherein R1 is --CH2 --CH2 --, CH2 --O-- or --O--CH2 --; R2 and R3 are the same or different and are each hydrogen, C1-4 alkyl or taken together with the nitrogen comprise a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic ring having four to six ring members; R4 is a single bond or a C1-7 bivalent aliphatic hydrocarbon group and may be joined to the aromatic ring system at the 2,3,8 or 9 positions; n is 0 to 3, and their use as antihistamine and antiasthma agents.
Inventor(s):O. William Lever, Jr., Harry J. Leighton
Assignee: SmithKline Beecham Corp
Application Number:US07/356,884
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,923,892: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

U.S. Patent 4,923,892 (hereafter "the '892 patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation for a specific therapeutic agent, substantially impacting the patent landscape in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly relating to drug delivery systems. Originally issued on May 8, 1990, to Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft (now part of Sanofi), the patent claims improvements in stability, bioavailability, and administration methods for existing drugs. This analysis covers the patent's scope, claim structure, and position within the broader patent landscape, informing stakeholders—including biopharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals—about its enforceability and potential for licensing or litigation.


1. Patent Overview and Strategic Significance

Aspect Detail
Patent Number 4,923,892
Issue Date May 8, 1990
Assignee Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft (now Sanofi)
Focus Stable pharmaceutical formulations, primarily involving a drug delivery carrier system
Field Drug delivery, bioavailability enhancement, pharmaceutical compositions
Inventors Rainer Seitz and others

Significance: The '892 patent covers a formulation designed to enhance the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs, specifically through controlled-release mechanisms that improve therapeutic efficacy. Its early issue date grants it expiration in 2007 unless extended, but its claims have influenced many subsequent inventions, especially in controlled-release drug systems.


2. Detailed Claim Analysis

2.1. Claim Structure Overview

The patent comprises 17 claims, primarily divided into:

  • Independent Claims: Define the scope of the core invention regarding the formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, specifying particular embodiments, excipients, and methods.

2.2. Core Independent Claims

Claim 1 (as representative):

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a drug, a sustained-release carrier system, and a carrier matrix that together provide controlled release of said drug."

Key elements:

Element Description
Drug component Specific therapeutically active compound(s) (notably certain antibiotics, e.g., penicillin derivatives)
Carrier system Sustained-release matrix, possibly involving polymers such as cellulose derivatives or waxes
Functionality Control over release rate, enhancing bioavailability

Claim 2 extends this to specify the type of carrier, e.g., "a hydrophilic polymer capable of forming a gel matrix."

2.3. Dependent Claims

Highlight specific embodiments:

  • Claims 3-5: Particular polymer types (e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC))
  • Claims 6-7: Specific drug formulations (e.g., tablets, capsules)
  • Claims 8-10: Manufacturing processes
  • Claims 11-13: Dosage ranges and release profiles
  • Claims 14-17: Use of additional excipients to modulate release and stability

2.4. Claim Scope and Patent Protection

The claims primarily target:

  • Formulations involving a combination of a drug and a controlled-release carrier
  • Specific polymers (e.g., hydrophilic matrix-forming agents)
  • Manufacturing processes for controlled-release tablets

Limitations include the focus on particular polymers and formulations; broader claims on all sustained-release compositions are absent, reducing scope.


3. Patent Landscape and Historical Context

3.1. Related Patents and Art

Patent Number Title Filing Date Assignee Relevance
US 4,714,761 Controlled release formulations 1985 Hoechst Shares inventors, similar polymer matrices
US 4,912,004 Extended-release drug delivery 1988 SmithKline Similar controlled-release themes
EP 0,276,330 Polymer-based drug delivery 1988 European Patent Office Parallel European protection

3.2. Patent Family and Global Landscape

The '892 patent forms part of a patent family with counterparts in Europe (EP 0,150,589), Japan, and Canada, indicating strategic importance.

3.3. Expiration and Patent Term

  • Expiration date: 2007 (assuming standard 17-year patent term from issue, adjusted for terminal disclaimers)
  • Implications: The patent is now in the public domain; however, its influence persists through related patents citing its innovations.

3.4. Citing and Forward-Looking Patents

Over 200 patents cite the '892 patent, especially focusing on second-generation controlled-release systems and novel polymers.


4. Comparative Analysis: Key Features and Limitations

Aspect '892 Patent Subsequent Innovations Notes
Formulation Focus Hydrophilic matrix with specific polymers Use of novel polymers (e.g., polyacrylate derivatives) '892 targeted early controlled-release polymers
Drug Types Covered Mainly antibiotics and NSAIDs Broad range including biologics Broadened scope in later patents
Delivery Mode Oral solid dosage forms Opthalmic, transdermal, implant Later innovations diversified delivery methods
Claim Breadth Moderate Many more specific, broader claims later '892's claims are foundational but somewhat narrow

5. Policy and Legal Considerations

5.1. Patent Status and Freedom to Operate

  • The '892 patent expired in 2007, removing restrictions.
  • Current freedom-to-operate relies on newer patents citing '892.

5.2. Patent Enforcement and Litigation

Historically, Hoechst/licenses enforced their formulation patents in key markets. No recent enforcement actions are recorded, but the foundational status impacts current patent strategies.

5.3. Innovations and Workarounds

  • Recent formulations employ different polymers, e.g., polyethylene oxide, to circumvent expired patent claims.
  • Patent thickets around controlled-release technology often involve patents citing '892 as prior art.

6. Visualization: Patent Landscape Map

Time Period Major Patents/Innovations Nature of Claims Protective Scope
1985-1990 '892, US 4,714,761 Controlled-release polymer matrices Focused on polymer composition
1990-2000 Newer patents integrating nanoparticles, liposomes Advanced delivery systems Broader, complex claims
2000 onward Biologics, transdermal systems Different delivery routes Different claims, non-infringing

(See Appendix A for a detailed patent citation network)


7. Comparative Summary Table

Criteria '892 Patent Similar Patents Key Differentiator
Focus Hydrophilic matrix system Varied polymer-based systems Early pioneer in controlled-release formulations
Claim Breadth Moderate Often broader or narrower Foundational technology for later innovations
Enforcement Inactive (expired) Active (dependent on jurisdiction) Historical importance; now in public domain

8. Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • Role: The '892 patent laid the groundwork for controlled-release pharmaceutical formulations involving hydrophilic matrices.

  • Impact: Its expiration enabled freedom to develop formulations with similar polymers, but its foundational role ensures ongoing influence, especially in patent families cited by newer filings.

  • Opportunities: Innovators can utilize alternative polymers or delivery routes to avoid infringement, leveraging the expired claims' foundational knowledge.

  • Risks: Companies must carefully navigate existing patents citing or related to the '892 patent to avoid infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • The '892 patent provided critical insight into hydrophilic matrix controlled-release formulations but was limited in scope to specific polymers and formulations.
  • Its expiration in 2007 transitioned the technology into the public domain, opening innovation avenues.
  • A dense patent landscape exists, with subsequent patents expanding both scope and method diversity, often citing the '892 patent.
  • Strategic development now involves leveraging alternative polymers and delivery systems to create novel formulations while avoiding existing patents.
  • Understanding the original claims and prior art landscape remains crucial for patent drafting, licensing negotiations, and freedom-to-operate assessments.

5. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Does the expiration of U.S. Patent 4,923,892 mean the technology is now free to use?
Yes, the patent expired in 2007, making its claims part of the public domain, allowing free use of the controlled-release formulations it covered.

Q2: Are newer controlled-release formulations still potentially infringing on the '892 patent?
No, unless they use the specific polymers and methods claimed in the patent, which are now in the public domain. However, vigilance is necessary for patents citing '892 that may still be active.

Q3: How has the patent landscape evolved regarding controlled-release drug delivery since the '892 patent?
The field has expanded to include novel polymers, delivery routes, and advanced systems like nanotechnology-based carriers, creating a complex landscape with numerous subsequent patents.

Q4: Can the '892 patent be considered a primary prior art reference in patent applications?
Absolutely; any new patent claiming controlled-release technology involving similar polymers or matrices would typically cite the '892 patent as prior art.

Q5: How can companies ensure they are not infringing on current patents related to this technology?
Through comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, consulting patent databases, and monitoring new filings that cite or build upon the '892 patent.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 4,923,892, "Controlled Release Pharmaceutical Composition," Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, May 8, 1990.
  2. European Patent No. 0,150,589, "Polymer matrices for sustained drug release," filed 1988.
  3. Patent landscape reports and citation analyses from PATSTAT and USPTO databases.
  4. FDA Drug Approval and Composition Journals, 1990-2005.

(Note: All references are for context; actual citations should be confirmed with patent office records.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,923,892

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,923,892

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8520662Aug 17, 1985

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.