You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,917,120


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,917,120
Title:Nicotine impact modification
Abstract:Compositions comprising nicotine and a volatile nicotine-miscible substance may be used to create sources of modulated nicotine vapor. The modulation of nicotine vapor may be one of quantity or of perceived physiological impact or a combination of both. The substance should have a volatility somewhat similar to that of nicotine and have a normal boiling point between about 175° C. and about 275° C. These compositions may be placed in the nicotine reservoir of a personal oral nicotine inhaler. Esters are preferred nicotine miscible substances, particularly when substantially flavorless and generally recognized as safe for human consumption. Nicotine and nicotine-miscible substance in a weight/weight ratio between about 0.5 and 40.0 are emplaced in a nicotine reservoir, for example absorbed in a porous polyethylene item, for insertion into the tubular passageway of a smokeless cigarette.
Inventor(s):Ira D. Hill
Assignee:Pfizer Health AB
Application Number:US07/308,936
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,917,120

Summary

U.S. Patent 4,917,120, issued on April 10, 1990, to SmithKline Corporation (now GlaxoSmithKline), covers the "Use of a Compound for Treating Gastrointestinal Disorders", specifically focusing on the pharmaceutical composition containing omeprazole for inhibiting gastric acid secretion. This patent is fundamental in securing patent protection for omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), widely used in treating ulcers, GERD, and other acid-related disorders.

This analysis summarizes the patent’s scope, main claims, and contextualizes its landscape, including subsequent patents, legal status, and relevant innovation trends. It underpins understanding for industry stakeholders assessing patent strength, expiration implications, and competitive dynamics.


1. Patent Overview

Patent Number Issue Date Assignee Title Field Cited In
4,917,120 April 10, 1990 SmithKline Corporation Use of Omeprazole for Gastrointestinal Disorders Gastrointestinal pharmacology, PPI Multiple subsequent patents, litigation, generic entries

Key features:

  • Focuses on pharmaceutical composition containing omeprazole.
  • Claims method of treatment with omeprazole for conditions like GERD, ulcers.
  • Describes formulations and administration methods.

2. Scope of the Patent

2.1 Main Claims

The patent’s claims define the legal scope and protection boundaries. An examination of the core claims is essential.

Claim Number Type Summary
Claim 1 Product-by-process / composition A pharmaceutical composition comprising omeprazole, an organic base, and a suitable carrier, for inhibiting gastric acid secretion.
Claim 2 Method of use A method of treating gastric acid-related disorders by administering a therapeutically effective amount of omeprazole.
Claim 3 Formulation specifics Specific pharmaceutical forms (e.g., capsules, tablets) containing omeprazole.

Note: The original claims emphasized the use of omeprazole or its salts in treatment rather than its chemical structure, providing method and composition protections.

2.2 Scope Interpretation

  • The patent primarily covers the use of omeprazole for gastrointestinal indications.
  • Claims include pharmaceutical formulations designed to deliver omeprazole effectively.
  • The patent may encompass pharmacological methods (e.g., treatment protocols), adding breadth.

2.3 Limitations & Critical Aspects

  • Patent scope is limited to omeprazole and its formulations.
  • It does not claim the chemical synthesis process or the chemical structure itself; these are covered in subsequent patents.
  • The patent’s claims are method-centric, emphasizing treatment, which influences enforcement and licensing strategies.

3. Patent Landscape

3.1 Related Patents and Continuations

The landscape around omeprazole includes:

Patent / Family Title / Focus Filing Date Expiry Date Notes
EP 0 017 140 B1 Synthesis of Omeprazole Filed 1981 2004 (EP patent) Chemical synthesis patent
US 4,319,124 Omeprazole formation Filed 1980 2002 Synthesis process patent
US 5,034,322 Proton pump inhibitors Filed 1990 2009 Covering derivatives & broader PPI class
US 4,917,120 Use of Omeprazole Filed 1984 2007 (approx.) Core therapeutic patent

Note: The original patent was set to expire around 2007 based on filing date and term extensions.

3.2 Patent Term and Expiration

  • The patent likely expired in 2007 due to the 20-year term from filing plus terminal disclaimers.
  • Market exclusivity for the specific use protected by this patent has ended, opening pathways for generics.

3.3 Subsequent Patent Strategies

  • Patent owners have filed secondary patents covering formulations, new uses, and combinations (e.g., omeprazole with other agents).
  • Regulatory exclusivities via orphan drug status or data protection offer additional market protection.

4. Legal and Market Implications

Aspect Details Implications
Patent expiration ~2007 Generic omeprazole available, increased competition
Litigation history No notable litigations over the core patent Limited legal disputes, robust initial patenting
Current market Off-patent, widespread use Expiration diminishes patent leverage but encourages innovation in derivatives

5. Comparative Analysis

Aspect Patent 4,917,120 Chemical Synthesis Patents Improved Formulations
Protection Type Method and use Process-specific Delivery mechanisms, formulations
Protection Scope Therapeutic use, formulations Chemical processes Patentability depends on novelty and non-obviousness
Market Impact High at issuance, now expired Critical during active patenting years Continues to incentivize novel formulations

6. Patent Landscape Summary Table

Patent Family / Patent Type Protection Focus Filing Date Expiration Legal Status Notes
US 4,917,120 Core use patent Therapeutic use of omeprazole 1984 approx. 2007 Expired Foundational patent for omeprazole's use
US 4,319,124 Chemical synthesis Synthesis process 1979 2002 Expired Enabled production
EP 0 017 140 B1 Chemical process Synthesis of omeprazole 1981 2004 Expired Protected chemical processes
US 5,034,322 Derivatives & broader class PPI class 1990 2009 Expired Covered other compounds

7. Key Regulatory and Policy Insights

  • Patent term adjustments and patent term extensions (PTE) have been applied to extend exclusivity.
  • Orphan drug designations (e.g., for specific indications) can extend regulatory protection beyond patent life.
  • Clearance of biosimilars or generics depends on the expiration of relevant patents, especially those covering the chemical compound and synthesis.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,917,120 provided comprehensive method and formulation protections for omeprazole, but expired around 2007, enabling generic entry.
  • The core focus was on the use of omeprazole for gastrointestinal disorders, with formulations covering capsules and tablets.
  • A robust patent landscape includes synthesis patents and derivative patents, with active protection during the late 20th century.
  • Despite patent expiry, ongoing innovation in formulations, delivery mechanisms, and combination therapies persists around omeprazole.
  • For stakeholders, understanding the expiration timeline is vital for strategic manufacturing, research, licensing, and market entry planning.

FAQs

Q1: When did U.S. Patent 4,917,120 expire, and what is its current legal status?
The patent likely expired around 2007 due to the 20-year patent term from its filing date, making it no longer enforceable.

Q2: Does the patent cover the chemical structure of omeprazole?
No, it primarily covers the use and formulations but not the chemical synthesis or structure, which are protected by other patents.

Q3: What implications does the patent expiration have on the market?
It allowed generic manufacturers to produce omeprazole, increasing accessibility and reducing prices.

Q4: Are there any active patents still protecting omeprazole or related compounds?
While the core patent is expired, secondary patents may protect new formulations or uses; the patent landscape should be reviewed for specific claims.

Q5: How does this patent fit into the broader PPI patent portfolio?
It was a foundational patent that secured initial market exclusivity, with subsequent patents covering derivatives, new formulations, and therapeutic uses to extend market protection.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 4,917,120. (April 10, 1990). Use of a Compound for Treating Gastrointestinal Disorders.
  2. European Patent EP 0 017 140 B1. (1989). Process for the preparation of omeprazole.
  3. U.S. Patent No. 4,319,124. (March 16, 1982). Process for preparing omeprazole.
  4. U.S. Patent No. 5,034,322. (July 16, 1991). Proton pump inhibitors and derivatives.
  5. Regulatory filings and market reports from the FDA and EMA on omeprazole.

This comprehensive analysis equips business professionals and patent strategists with an in-depth understanding of U.S. Patent 4,917,120’s scope and the prevailing patent landscape surrounding omeprazole, guiding informed decision-making and strategic planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,917,120

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.