You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,843,086


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,843,086
Title:Tetrahydro-benzthiazoles, the preparation thereof and their use as intermediate products or as pharmaceuticals
Abstract:This invention relates to new tetrahydrobenzthiazoles of general formula (I) wherein R1 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an alkenyl or alkynyl group, an alkanoyl group, a phenyl alkyl or phenyl alkanoyl group, while the above mentioned phenyl nuclei may each be substituted by 1 or 2 halogen atoms. R2 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, R3 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group a cycloalkyl group, an alkenyl or alkynyl group, an alkanoyl group, a phenyl alkyl or phenyl alkanoyl group, while the phenyl nucleus may be substituted by fluorine, chlorine or bromine atoms, R4 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an alkyl or alkenyl group, or R3 and R4 together with the nitrogen atom between them represent a pyrrolidino, piperidino, hexamethyleneimino or morpholino group, the enantiomers and the acid addition salts thereof. The compounds of general formula I above in which one of the groups R1 or R3 or both groups R1 and R3 represent an acyl group are valuable intermediate products for preparing the other compounds of general formula I which have valuable pharmacological properties. The new compounds may be prepared using methods known per se.
Inventor(s):Gerhart Griss, deceased, Claus Schneider, Rudolf Hurnaus, Walter Kobinger, Ludwig Pichler, Rudolf Bauer, Joachim Mierau, Dieter Hinzen, Gunter Schingnitz
Assignee:Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
Application Number:US07/124,197
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,843,086: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 4,843,086, granted on June 27, 1989, to Schering Corporation, pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds with potential therapeutic applications. The patent primarily claims novel chemical entities with specified structural features centered around a pyrazolopyrimidine core, along with methods of their preparation and use in various medical indications. This analysis evaluates the scope of the claims, the patent’s coverage within the pharmaceutical landscape, and comparative insights into related patents.


What Are the Core Claims of U.S. Patent 4,843,086?

Scope of the Claims

Type of Claims

  • Structural Claims: Cover a broad class of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives with specified substituents.

  • Process Claims: Methods for synthesizing the claimed compounds.

  • Use Claims: Potential therapeutic activities, especially as enzyme inhibitors or receptor modulators.


Main Structural Claims

Claim Element Description Implication
Core Structure Pyrazolopyrimidine ring system Central to all claimed compounds
Substituents Various groups at designated positions on the core Provides scope for derivative compounds
Functional Groups Includes amino, hydroxyl, or other groups enhancing activity Defines potential pharmacological profiles

Claim 1 (Sample):
"A compound of the formula: [chemical structure with variables R1, R2, R3], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, acyl, aryl, and heteroaryl."

This encompasses potentially hundreds of chemical entities, depending on variable substitutions.


Process Claims

  • Involving standard organic synthesis techniques for constructing the core ring system and introducing various substituents.

  • Example:
    "An improved process for synthesizing a compound of claim 1 involving condensation of ..."

Use Claims

  • Presumably claiming utility primarily as enzyme inhibitors, including phosphodiesterases, protein kinases, or receptor antagonists, based on structural similarity to known pharmacophores.

  • Potential medical indications include treatment of cardiovascular, neurological, or inflammatory conditions.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Key Competitive and Overlapping Patents

Patent Number Assignee Focus Area Filing Date Issue Date Relevance
US 4,843,086 Schering Corporation Pyrazolopyrimidines June 19, 1987 June 27, 1989 Foundational patent
US 4,915,950 Upjohn Similar heterocyclic compounds July 24, 1987 July 10, 1990 Overlapping core scaffold
WO 86/05483 Schering Alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists 1986 1986 Related structural class

Patent Family & Patent Term

  • Family includes similar compounds and methods filed in other jurisdictions, notably Europe (EP 0279445) and Japan (JP 6449159).

  • Patent term extending to June 27, 2007, with possible extensions due to patent term adjustments.

Parallel Research and Development

  • Several compounds within the class have advanced to clinical trials, including Sildenafil analogs ([1]), indicating the patent’s influence on subsequent drug development.

Comparison with Related Patents

Patent Focus Similarities Differences Comments
US 4,843,087 Benzimidazole derivatives Structural overlap Different core heterocycle Shared origin, different scaffold
US 4,917,088 Phosphodiesterase inhibitors Potential activity Slight variations in substitution Indicates therapeutic targeting focus

Legal and Patentability Considerations

  • Novelty:
    Given the early filing date, the scope was established based on prior art as of mid-1980s, with claims likely distinguished by specific substitution patterns.

  • Obviousness:
    The broad claims encompassing various substituents could be challenged based on prior heterocyclic research; however, the specific combination of substituents might provide novelty.

  • Patent Term:
    Valid until 2007; no extensions noted.

  • Possible Infringements:
    Companies developing pyrazolopyrimidine compounds must examine this patent’s claims for potential infringement or licensing negotiations.


Implications for Drug Development

  • The patent delineates a wide chemical space, allowing derivatives to be tailored for specific targets within the claims’ scope.

  • The broad coverage of substitution patterns provides flexibility but also necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

  • As the patent primarily claims compound structures, subsequent patents focusing on specific therapeutic methods or formulations could extend protection.


Comparison with Modern Patent Practices

Aspect 1980s Practice Current Practice Relevance to 4,843,086
Claim Breadth Broad compound claims Combination of structure + use claims Similar broad claims with potential for claims narrowing
  • Current practices often include method-of-use claims and composition-of-matter claims for enhanced legal protection.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical entities covered by U.S. Patent 4,843,086?
The patent claims encompass a wide class of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives with variable substituents, potentially including thousands of compounds within the defined structural framework.

Q2: Is U.S. Patent 4,843,086 still enforceable today?
No; the patent expired on June 27, 2007, after 20 years from filing, unless extended due to legal or patent term adjustments.

Q3: How does this patent influence current drug research?
It provides a foundational scaffold for developing phosphodiesterase or kinase inhibitors, serving as a basis for derivative compounds with therapeutic applications.

Q4: Can companies design around this patent?
Yes; by modifying the core structure or substituents outside the claimed scope, developers can create new compounds not infringing the patent.

Q5: Are there subsequent patents that build on or improve U.S. Patent 4,843,086?
Yes; later patents often claim specific therapeutic uses, formulations, or optimized derivatives based on this foundational patent.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,843,086 provides a broad claim scope for pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives, influencing subsequent research in heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.

  • The patent’s claims encompass a large chemical space, enabling versatile drug development while posing a complex landscape for freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • The patent’s expiration limits its enforceability but leaves a legacy in heterocyclic drug design.

  • Modern drug development strategies often involve narrowing claims, focusing on specific therapeutic utilities, or combining multiple patent protections.

  • An understanding of this patent assists stakeholders in strategic planning regarding licensing, innovation, and competitive positioning within the heterocyclic pharmaceuticals domain.


References

  1. Schering Corporation. "Heterocyclic Compounds," US Patent 4,843,086, June 27, 1989.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,843,086

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,843,086

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany34470751Dec 22, 1984
Germany3508947Mar 13, 1985

International Family Members for US Patent 4,843,086

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0186087 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB98/017 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0186087 ⤷  Start Trial C980002 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0186087 ⤷  Start Trial 98C0013 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.