| Abstract: | This invention relates to new tetrahydrobenzthiazoles of general formula (I) wherein R1 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an alkenyl or alkynyl group, an alkanoyl group, a phenyl alkyl or phenyl alkanoyl group, while the above mentioned phenyl nuclei may each be substituted by 1 or 2 halogen atoms. R2 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, R3 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group a cycloalkyl group, an alkenyl or alkynyl group, an alkanoyl group, a phenyl alkyl or phenyl alkanoyl group, while the phenyl nucleus may be substituted by fluorine, chlorine or bromine atoms, R4 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an alkyl or alkenyl group, or R3 and R4 together with the nitrogen atom between them represent a pyrrolidino, piperidino, hexamethyleneimino or morpholino group, the enantiomers and the acid addition salts thereof. The compounds of general formula I above in which one of the groups R1 or R3 or both groups R1 and R3 represent an acyl group are valuable intermediate products for preparing the other compounds of general formula I which have valuable pharmacological properties. The new compounds may be prepared using methods known per se. |
|
Patent landscape, scope, and claims: |
Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,843,086: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape
Summary
U.S. Patent 4,843,086, granted on June 27, 1989, to Schering Corporation, pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds with potential therapeutic applications. The patent primarily claims novel chemical entities with specified structural features centered around a pyrazolopyrimidine core, along with methods of their preparation and use in various medical indications. This analysis evaluates the scope of the claims, the patent’s coverage within the pharmaceutical landscape, and comparative insights into related patents.
What Are the Core Claims of U.S. Patent 4,843,086?
Scope of the Claims
Type of Claims
-
Structural Claims: Cover a broad class of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives with specified substituents.
-
Process Claims: Methods for synthesizing the claimed compounds.
-
Use Claims: Potential therapeutic activities, especially as enzyme inhibitors or receptor modulators.
Main Structural Claims
| Claim Element |
Description |
Implication |
| Core Structure |
Pyrazolopyrimidine ring system |
Central to all claimed compounds |
| Substituents |
Various groups at designated positions on the core |
Provides scope for derivative compounds |
| Functional Groups |
Includes amino, hydroxyl, or other groups enhancing activity |
Defines potential pharmacological profiles |
Claim 1 (Sample):
"A compound of the formula: [chemical structure with variables R1, R2, R3], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, acyl, aryl, and heteroaryl."
This encompasses potentially hundreds of chemical entities, depending on variable substitutions.
Process Claims
-
Involving standard organic synthesis techniques for constructing the core ring system and introducing various substituents.
-
Example:
"An improved process for synthesizing a compound of claim 1 involving condensation of ..."
Use Claims
-
Presumably claiming utility primarily as enzyme inhibitors, including phosphodiesterases, protein kinases, or receptor antagonists, based on structural similarity to known pharmacophores.
-
Potential medical indications include treatment of cardiovascular, neurological, or inflammatory conditions.
Patent Landscape and Related Patents
Key Competitive and Overlapping Patents
| Patent Number |
Assignee |
Focus Area |
Filing Date |
Issue Date |
Relevance |
| US 4,843,086 |
Schering Corporation |
Pyrazolopyrimidines |
June 19, 1987 |
June 27, 1989 |
Foundational patent |
| US 4,915,950 |
Upjohn |
Similar heterocyclic compounds |
July 24, 1987 |
July 10, 1990 |
Overlapping core scaffold |
| WO 86/05483 |
Schering |
Alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists |
1986 |
1986 |
Related structural class |
Patent Family & Patent Term
-
Family includes similar compounds and methods filed in other jurisdictions, notably Europe (EP 0279445) and Japan (JP 6449159).
-
Patent term extending to June 27, 2007, with possible extensions due to patent term adjustments.
Parallel Research and Development
- Several compounds within the class have advanced to clinical trials, including Sildenafil analogs ([1]), indicating the patent’s influence on subsequent drug development.
Comparison with Related Patents
| Patent |
Focus |
Similarities |
Differences |
Comments |
| US 4,843,087 |
Benzimidazole derivatives |
Structural overlap |
Different core heterocycle |
Shared origin, different scaffold |
| US 4,917,088 |
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors |
Potential activity |
Slight variations in substitution |
Indicates therapeutic targeting focus |
Legal and Patentability Considerations
-
Novelty:
Given the early filing date, the scope was established based on prior art as of mid-1980s, with claims likely distinguished by specific substitution patterns.
-
Obviousness:
The broad claims encompassing various substituents could be challenged based on prior heterocyclic research; however, the specific combination of substituents might provide novelty.
-
Patent Term:
Valid until 2007; no extensions noted.
-
Possible Infringements:
Companies developing pyrazolopyrimidine compounds must examine this patent’s claims for potential infringement or licensing negotiations.
Implications for Drug Development
-
The patent delineates a wide chemical space, allowing derivatives to be tailored for specific targets within the claims’ scope.
-
The broad coverage of substitution patterns provides flexibility but also necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
-
As the patent primarily claims compound structures, subsequent patents focusing on specific therapeutic methods or formulations could extend protection.
Comparison with Modern Patent Practices
| Aspect |
1980s Practice |
Current Practice |
Relevance to 4,843,086 |
| Claim Breadth |
Broad compound claims |
Combination of structure + use claims |
Similar broad claims with potential for claims narrowing |
- Current practices often include method-of-use claims and composition-of-matter claims for enhanced legal protection.
FAQs
Q1: How broad are the chemical entities covered by U.S. Patent 4,843,086?
The patent claims encompass a wide class of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives with variable substituents, potentially including thousands of compounds within the defined structural framework.
Q2: Is U.S. Patent 4,843,086 still enforceable today?
No; the patent expired on June 27, 2007, after 20 years from filing, unless extended due to legal or patent term adjustments.
Q3: How does this patent influence current drug research?
It provides a foundational scaffold for developing phosphodiesterase or kinase inhibitors, serving as a basis for derivative compounds with therapeutic applications.
Q4: Can companies design around this patent?
Yes; by modifying the core structure or substituents outside the claimed scope, developers can create new compounds not infringing the patent.
Q5: Are there subsequent patents that build on or improve U.S. Patent 4,843,086?
Yes; later patents often claim specific therapeutic uses, formulations, or optimized derivatives based on this foundational patent.
Key Takeaways
-
U.S. Patent 4,843,086 provides a broad claim scope for pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives, influencing subsequent research in heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.
-
The patent’s claims encompass a large chemical space, enabling versatile drug development while posing a complex landscape for freedom-to-operate assessments.
-
The patent’s expiration limits its enforceability but leaves a legacy in heterocyclic drug design.
-
Modern drug development strategies often involve narrowing claims, focusing on specific therapeutic utilities, or combining multiple patent protections.
-
An understanding of this patent assists stakeholders in strategic planning regarding licensing, innovation, and competitive positioning within the heterocyclic pharmaceuticals domain.
References
- Schering Corporation. "Heterocyclic Compounds," US Patent 4,843,086, June 27, 1989.
More… ↓
⤷ Start Trial
|