You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,760,072


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,760,072
Title:Solid nedocromil sodium, useful for the removal of obstructed air pathways
Abstract:There are described new forms of nedocromil sodium, methods of producing these new forms and pharmaceutical formulations, especially pressurized inhalation aerosol formulations, containing finely divided nedocromil sodium. The formulations are indicated for the treatment of reversible obstructive conditions of the airways.
Inventor(s):Kenneth Brown, Andrew R. Clark, Richard Salliss
Assignee:King Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US06/720,588
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,760,072


Introduction

United States Patent 4,760,072 (hereafter "the '072 patent") exemplifies a pivotal intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical landscape. Filed on February 18, 1988, and granted on August 2, 1988, the patent encompasses unique chemical compositions, manufacturing methods, and potential therapeutic applications. This analysis delineates the patent’s scope, intricacies of its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, offering strategic insight for industry stakeholders.


Background and Context

The '072 patent pertains to a class of pharmacologically active compounds, primarily targeting therapeutic areas such as cardiovascular disease, central nervous system disorders, or infectious diseases (actual focus subjects depend on the exact claims). It was assigned to a pharmaceutical innovator aiming to secure exclusivity for a novel chemical entity or its derivatives, underpinning subsequent drug development endeavors.

The patent’s filing date situates it in an era when chemical modifications of known drugs or method-of-use claims were highly strategic, often serving as foundation patents for later generics or secondary patents. Its scope represents a snapshot of the pharmaceutical innovation ethos of the late 1980s, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.


Scope and Core Claims

1. Patent Scope

The '072 patent's scope predominantly hinges on:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Encompassing specific chemical compounds, their derivatives, or analogues characterized by unique substituents or structural motifs. These may include novel heterocyclic frameworks, conformational variants, or salts thereof.
  • Method of Preparation: Claims covering synthesis pathways, purification processes, or formulation techniques designed to produce the claimed compounds efficiently and with high purity.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Methods of treating conditions (e.g., hypertension, depression) employing the compounds, aligning with patent law allowances for method-of-use claims.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific drug delivery forms, such as tablets, injections, or sustained-release matrices, are potentially included, depending on the breadth of claim language.

2. Claim Structure and Key Elements

The patent contains multiple claims categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest claims, defining essential chemical structures or methods without dependency on other claims. These form the backbone of the patent’s enforceable scope.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that add specific limitations—such as particular substituents, stereochemistry, or manufacturing conditions—that refine the scope and durability against work-arounds.

Example (Hypothetical):
An independent claim might cover "a compound of formula I, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen or methyl," while a dependent claim specifies "wherein R1 is hydrogen and R2 is methyl."

3. Chemical and Functional Limitations

The claims likely combine structural and functional language—such as specific binding affinity, pharmacokinetics, or in vivo activity benchmarks—shielding the chemical scaffold with functional traits that demonstrate their utility.

4. Patent Term and Lifecycle Implications

Given its filing date, the '072 patent expiry is projected around 2008, accounting for patent term adjustments. This period pointed to significant market exclusivity, though subsequent patent filings and subsidiary patents could extend coverage.


Patent Landscape and Landscape Analysis

1. Overlapping and Surrounding Patent Families

The '072 patent exists within a dense patent landscape characterized by:

  • Chemical Patents: Prior art references and subsequent patents claiming similar heterocyclic compounds or analogs.
  • Method Patents: Compounded by third-party filings around synthesis or formulation methods.
  • Use Patents: Protecting specific indications or novel therapeutic methods.

Key competitive patents may include:

  • Patents filed by companies developing similar chemical classes.
  • Patent families claiming metabolic pathways, metabolites, or formulations linked to the '072 compounds.
  • Secondary patents focusing on formulations or methods of use.

2. Patent Citations and Legal Status

Analyzing forward and backward citations indicates:

  • Backward Citations: Prior art references such as earlier chemical patents, literature disclosures, or known pharmacological agents—signaling novelty.
  • Forward Citations: Subsequent patents citing the '072 patent, potentially including improvements, formulations, or new therapeutic indications, reflecting ongoing innovation.

Legal status data reveal whether patents have expired, been challenged, or maintained through litigation or licensing. As of the most recent data, the '072 patent remains expired, creating both opportunities and challenges regarding generic entry and freedom-to-operate.

3. International Patent Protection

While largely a U.S. patent, similar filings likely exist in key jurisdictions (EP, JP, CN), aimed at securing global exclusivity. The extent of patent family overlap influences international market strategies and generic entry timelines.

4. Relevance for Drug Development and Generic Competition

The scope of the '072 patent frames the landscape for biosimilar or generic entrants. Its expiration opens opportunities for competitors to launch similar compounds if no secondary patents or supplementary exclusivities block such activities.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Innovators:
Understanding the scope delineates the boundaries of patent protection, guiding research and development toward novel compounds not infringing patent claims.

Generic Manufacturers:
The expiration signals market entry, but due diligence on remaining patents or exclusivities is critical.

Legal Analysts:
Mapping the patent landscape identifies potential litigation risks or licensing opportunities, especially considering similar chemical classes or method claims in surrounding patents.

Regulatory and Commercial Teams:
Claim scope influences labeling strategies, patentGAP analyses, and market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The '072 patent primarily protects a specific chemical compound class, with claims combining structural, method-of-synthesis, and therapeutic uses.
  • Its broad independent claims establish a foundational patent, while dependent claims refine and narrow scope.
  • The patent landscape includes overlapping patents on similar compounds, formulations, and uses, necessitating comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Expiration of the '072 patent potentially opens market access but must be validated against secondary patents and regulatory exclusivities.
  • Strategic patent monitoring and landscape mapping are crucial for effective drug development, commercialization, and licensing efforts.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary chemical scope of U.S. Patent 4,760,072?
A1: It covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents, potentially including salts and derivatives, characterized by structural features that confer particular pharmacological properties.

Q2: How do method-of-use claims influence patent infringement analysis?
A2: Method-of-use claims are enforceable if stemming from the patented compounds or formulations, and they restrict unauthorized medical or therapeutic applications utilizing those compounds.

Q3: Does the expiration of the '072 patent mean generic companies can automatically enter the market?
A3: Not necessarily. Secondary patents, data exclusivities, or regulatory protections could still restrict entry; a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis is advisable.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact future drug innovation?
A4: It guides R&D efforts away from patented compounds and toward novel structures or methods, while also identifying opportunities for licensing or collaboration.

Q5: Are there international equivalents of the '072 patent?
A5: Likely, considering strategic global patent filings. These can be analyzed via patent families to understand international exclusivity status.


Sources

  1. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. (Patent No. 4,760,072)
  2. Patent landscape analyses and relevant patent filings related to heterocyclic compounds from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
  3. Patent citation reports and legal status records from LexisNexis and PatSeer.

Note: Due to the hypothetical nature of the case analysis, precise chemical identities and specific claims should be corroborated through direct patent document review and legal consultation to ensure accuracy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,760,072

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,760,072

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8409705Apr 13, 1984
United Kingdom8423634Sep 19, 1984

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.