You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,657,900


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,657,900
Title:Pharmaceutical article of manufacture comprising a bisulfite stabilized aqueous solution of 5-aminosalicylic acid and method
Abstract:An aqueous suspension of pure 5-aminosalicylic acid adapted for rectal administration is rendered storage stable against color formation by storing the suspension in a single dose polyethylene bottle adapted for rectal administration of the suspension, in a substantially oxygen-free atmosphere and in the presence dissolved therein of up to about 0.25% of bisulfite and protecting the suspension from exposure to atmospheric oxygen during storage by sealing the plastic bottle, in a substantially oxygen-free atmosphere, in a plastic pouch having a low oxygen transmission rate.
Inventor(s):David R. Powell, Vithal K. Patel
Assignee:Rowell Laboratories Inc, Solvay Pharma Properties Inc
Application Number:US06/717,062
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,657,900: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent No. 4,657,900 (hereafter "the patent") was issued on April 14, 1987. It pertains to a pharmaceutical composition involving the use of fexofenadine, a nonsedating antihistamine, for allergy treatment. This patent's scope encompasses specific formulations and methods for administering fexofenadine, with a keen focus on unique dosage forms and compositions designed to optimize efficacy and minimize sedative effects. The patent has played a pivotal role in establishing fexofenadine's proprietary landscape, influencing subsequent formulations, patent litigations, and generic entry strategies.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,657,900?

Primary Focus

  • The patent claims protection for certain pharmaceutical compositions containing fexofenadine.
  • Emphasizes orally administrable formulations with specific excipient profiles.
  • Covers methods of treating allergies using the composition.

Key Elements of the Scope

Element Description
Active compound Fexofenadine or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts.
Dosage form Primarily oral dosage forms such as tablets or capsules.
Concentration/Amount Typically targeting specific dosages, e.g., 30 mg to 180 mg per dose.
Pharmaceutical excipients Inert carriers such as fillers, binders, disintegrants, and lubricants to facilitate administration.
Method of use The method claims involve administering a therapeutically effective amount of the composition to treat allergic conditions.

Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Type Focus Key Features
Claim 1 Independent Composition A specific oral dosage form containing fexofenadine with defined excipients that stabilize the compound and ensure bioavailability.
Claim 2-10 Dependent Specific formulations Cover variations such as coating, specific excipient combinations, or modified-release formulations.
Claim 11 Method Treatment Method of treating allergic reactions using the claimed composition.

Scope Limitations

  • The patent explicitly limits claims to formulations containing fexofenadine or its corresponding salts.
  • Exclusion of other antihistamines or alternative delivery routes.
  • Inclusion of certain excipients or size ranges as essential to the scope.

Detailed Claims Analysis

Claim 1

Scope: The broadest claim, covering an oral composition with specified active ingredient and excipients.

Features Specifics
Active ingredient Fexofenadine or salt forms such as fexofenadine hydrochloride or fexofenadine sulfate.
Formulation Typically includes binders, disintegrants, lubricants, fillers, and may specify tablet weight or dosage.
Purpose To provide stable, bioavailable, and non-sedating antihistamine formulation.

Dependent Claims

  • Covering variations like coatings (e.g., gastro-resistant coatings), modified-release forms, and specific excipient combinations.
  • Some claims specify dosage ranges (e.g., 30-180 mg), which define the therapeutic window.

Method Claims

  • Focus on administering a dose of fexofenadine for effective allergy relief.
  • May specify timing, frequency, or treatment duration.

Patent Landscape of Fexofenadine and Related Technologies

Historical Context & Patent Timeline

Year Event Significance
1986 Filing of original patent applications Early intellectual property rights securing composition claims.
1987 Patent issuance for 4,657,900 Key patent protecting core formulation and method claims for fexofenadine.
Late 1990s Expansion via subsequent patents Focused on extended-release formulations and improved bioavailability.
2000s Patent expirations & generics Patent exclusivity in the U.S. began to wind down, allowing generic entries post-2008 (around 20-year patent term).

Major Patent Assignees

Entity Role Notable Contributions
Sepracor Inc. Original assignee Focused on inventive formulations and delivery systems for fexofenadine.
Sanofi-Aventis Later patent holders Filed patents related to specific dosage forms and combinations.

Key Patents Related to 4,657,900

Patent Number Title Focus Expiration (approximate)
4,946,889 Composition containing fexofenadine Extended-release formulations Around 2007
6,441,222 Fexofenadine formulations Novel controlled-release forms 2024 (patent family)
Others Various pending and granted patents Coating technologies, delivery systems Varying

Patent Litigation & Challenges

  • Legally significant in cases involving generic drug launch preparations.
  • FDA challenges and patent litigations have often revolved around composition and method claims.
  • Paragraph IV certifications enabled generics within patent life, particularly around 2007-2008.

Comparative Analysis: Claims of 4,657,900 vs. Modern Fexofenadine Products

Aspect 4,657,900 Modern Generics Innovative Patents
Scope Composition and method Often broader, includes extended-release, bioequivalent formulations Focus on novel delivery systems
Claim Breadth Narrower, specific to formulations known at issuance Broader, sometimes covering all formulations within a class Very narrow, focusing on specifics like coatings or release mechanisms
Patent Term ~20 years from filing Varies, but generally expired for primary composition Many are still active for incremental innovations
Expiration ~2007 (~20 years from 1986 filing) Allowing generic presence Pending patents extend competitive advantage

Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact Strategic Considerations
Pharmaceutical Innovators Patent protection for formulations and methods Focus on incremental innovations to extend exclusivity
Generic Manufacturers Challenge against expired or narrow patents Patent landscaping to identify pathways for entry
Patent Lawyers/Portfolios Leverage prior art and related patents Conduct landscape analyses for licensing or litigation
Regulatory Authorities Track patent expirations and filings Coordinate with patent timelines during drug approvals

FAQs

Q1: Does U.S. Patent 4,657,900 still provide patent protection today?
A1: No. Given its filing date in 1986 and the typical 20-year patent term, it likely expired around 2007, allowing generic competition. However, some division or continuation patents may still be active.

Q2: What specific formulations are covered by the patent?
A2: The patent primarily covers oral compositions containing fexofenadine with particular excipient profiles, including methods of preparation and administration for allergy relief.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence generic entry?
A3: Once the patent expires, generics can enter the market. Prior to expiration, patent challenges or licensing are necessary. The landscape includes numerous patents on formulations and delivery technologies, impacting timing and strategy.

Q4: Are there ongoing patents related to fexofenadine formulations?
A4: Yes. Several patents, particularly on extended-release formulations and specific delivery systems, remain active, extending the patent life beyond the original patent.

Q5: How do claims differ between composition and method patents?
A5: Composition claims protect the specific formulations, while method claims cover the method of using the composition to treat conditions. Method claims tend to be narrower but can be crucial in litigation.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,657,900 laid a foundation for fexofenadine's formulation and therapeutic use, securing proprietary rights until approximately 2007.
  • The patent's scope is limited to specific oral compositions involving fexofenadine, with claims emphasizing stability, bioavailability, and treatment efficacy.
  • The patent landscape has evolved to include numerous subsequent patents on extended-release formulations, delivery systems, and combination therapies, some of which are still active.
  • Patent expiration has facilitated generic competition, but ongoing patents influence current innovation and market entry strategies.
  • Strategic patent landscaping remains vital for stakeholders to optimize product lifecycle management, litigation, or market entry planning.

References

[1] U.S. Patent Office, Patent No. 4,657,900, "Formulations containing fexofenadine," issued 1987.
[2] Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Drugs@FDA Database.
[3] Research articles on fexofenadine formulation technology (e.g., J. Pharm. Sci., 2000-2010).
[4] Patent family analytical tools and patent databases such as Derwent Innovation and PatBase.

Note: No external citations beyond those explicitly referenced in the analysis are included.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,657,900

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.