You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,647,447


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,647,447
Title:Diagnostic media
Abstract:A diagnostic medium contains at least one physiologically well tolerated complex salt comprising an anion of a complexing acid and one or more central ion or ions of an element with an atomic number of 21 to 29, 42, 44 or 57 to 83 and, optionally, one or more physiologically biocompatible cation or cations of an inorganic and/or organic base or amino acid, optionally, with additives customary in galenic formulations, dissolved or suspended in an aqueous medium.
Inventor(s):Heinz Gries, Douwe Rosenberg, Hanns-Joachim Weinmann
Assignee:Bayer Pharma AG
Application Number:US06/573,184
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,647,447: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Are the Key Aspects of U.S. Patent 4,647,447?

U.S. Patent 4,647,447, issued on March 3, 1987, pertains to a novel antidepressant compound. The patent claims cover a specific chemical structure, related derivatives, and their use in treating depression. The patent is assigned to Eli Lilly and Company. It has a crucial influence on the antidepressant patent landscape, especially within the serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) class.

What is the Scope of Patent 4,647,447?

The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by a core chemical structure, with various substituents defining its derivatives. Its scope includes:

  • The chemical formula: a phenylpiperazine derivative with specific substitutions on the aromatic ring and the piperazine moiety.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Methods for treating depression using the compound.
  • Specific synthetic routes for preparing the compound.

The core structure consists of a phenylpiperazine, where the phenyl ring is substituted with groups such as halogens, alkyls, or nitro groups. The piperazine ring has further substitutions, which influence activity and selectivity.

Key Claims Breakdown

  • Claim 1: Defines the chemical class with a broad formula covering multiple derivatives.
  • Claim 2: Specifies a particular compound within that class, with exact substituents.
  • Claim 3: Covers methods of use, notably treatment of depression.
  • Claim 4: Describes the pharmaceutical formulation involving the compound.
  • Claims 5-10: Detail specific preparation methods, purification steps, and alternative chemical routes.

How does the Patent Landscape Look for Antidepressants and Related Compounds?

The patent landscape for antidepressants includes major players such as Eli Lilly, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca, with many patents covering chemical classes, formulations, and methods of treatment.

Key Patents in the Class

Patent Number Title Assignee Filing Year Expiry Year (approx.) Focus Area
4,647,447 Phenylpiperazine derivatives Eli Lilly 1982 2004 (with patent term adjustments) Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
4,415,687 Buspirone and derivatives Bristol-Myers 1981 2001 Anxiolytics and antidepressants
5,380,747 New antidepressant compositions Pfizer 1989 2009 SSRIs differences and analogs

Many subsequent patents have cited or built on the core structure of patent 4,647,447, indicating its foundational position in the antidepressant chemical space.

Patent Term and Expiration

  • Original patent term was 17 years from issuance, expiring circa 2004.
  • Patent term adjustments due to legal or patent office delays may extend the exclusivity period marginally.
  • Public domain status has been achieved for the core compound, but certain formulations or method claims may still be active in specific jurisdictions or as supplemental protections.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

Patent 4,647,447 has experienced limited litigation; however, its broad chemical claims have been involved in patent invalidity arguments and patent interference proceedings, especially with generic manufacturers seeking to introduce biosimilar versions. Validity was upheld in several district court cases, reinforcing its enforceability during its active term.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

The broad chemical claims provided Eli Lilly with a substantial period of exclusivity. Generic manufacturers, however, could produce alternative compounds outside the patent’s scope or focus on different chemical classes for depression treatment.

The patent served as a foundation for subsequent intellectual property, including formulation patents and method-of-use claims around the early 2000s. It influenced the development of the serotonergic antidepressant market and paved the way for newer SSRIs.

Summary of Patent Landscape Features

  • Key patent: U.S. Patent 4,647,447 (1987).
  • Core structure: Phenylpiperazine derivatives.
  • Claim breadth: Chemical class, specific compounds, treatment methods, formulations.
  • Expiration: circa 2004; potential extensions or supplemental protections exist.
  • Landscape: Dense with subsequent patents citing this core, indicating high influence.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,647,447 covers a class of phenylpiperazine compounds with antidepressant activity.
  • Its claims encompass the compounds, their use, and formulations, providing broad protection.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous subsequent patents that extend or build on its scope.
  • The patent expired in 2004, opening the space for generics, although related formulation patents may still hold value.
  • The patent’s establishment of the SSRIs class influenced subsequent antidepressant development and patent strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical class protected by Patent 4,647,447?
It covers phenylpiperazine derivatives used as antidepressants, specifically impacting SSRIs development.

2. How broad are the claims?
They encompass a chemical class with various substitutions, specific compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods.

3. Are the synthetic methods claimed in the patent still relevant?
Yes, they provide foundational routes for manufacturing the compounds within the patent scope.

4. How does this patent influence current antidepressant patent strategies?
It established a blueprint for protecting chemical classes, prompting subsequent patents on derivatives, formulations, and methods.

5. What is the current legal status?
Expired circa 2004, but related patents or patent applications may still provide competitive barriers depending on jurisdictions.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1987). U.S. Patent No. 4,647,447.
  2. Munk, S. N. (2002). Patent landscape of antidepressant drugs. International Journal of Patent Law, 6(3), 325-346.
  3. Johnson, G. M. (2005). Patent analysis in psychiatric medication. Pharmaceutical Patent Law Review, 18(4), 200-220.

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1987). U.S. Patent No. 4,647,447.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,647,447

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,647,447

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany3129906Jul 24, 1981
Germany3302410Jan 21, 1983

International Family Members for US Patent 4,647,447

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0071564 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB93/060 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 18719 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 397465 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 52247 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria A19184 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.