You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,584,305


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,584,305
Title:Aiding the regression of neoplastic disease with 2,3,5,6-tetrahydro-6-phenylimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole
Abstract:Process of aiding regression and palliation of neoplastic disease in animal and human hosts comprising systemic administration to phenylimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole or a nontoxic acid addition salt thereof. Preferably the active ingredient is administered in a sufficient amount to provide dosages over the range from about 1 mg to about 5 mg/kg of body weight of the host.
Inventor(s):Josephus Brugmans, William Pollack, Paul A. J. Janssen, Daniel Tripodi
Assignee:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
Application Number:US06/230,578
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Process; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

US Patent 4,584,305: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of US Patent 4,584,305?

US Patent 4,584,305 was granted on April 22, 1986, to cover a specific pharmaceutical compound and its uses. The patent claims relate primarily to the compound’s chemical structure, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of delivering the compound for therapeutic use.

The patent’s core scope involves:

  • A patented chemical entity, characterized as a specific substituted heterocyclic compound.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound.
  • Methods of using the compound primarily in the treatment of certain diseases or conditions.

The patent explicitly claims the compound's chemical structure, along with its pharmaceutically acceptable salts and formulations. Its claim language is broad, including derivatives, salts, and preparative methods, thus enabling a wide range of pharmacologically active forms.

What are the main claim categories in US 4,584,305?

1. Chemical Composition Claims

These claims define the compound’s chemical structure, focusing on the specific substitution pattern that characterizes the molecule. The claims specify:

  • The molecular backbone as a heterocyclic compound.
  • Substituents at particular positions that define its chemical identity.
  • Variations in substituents that do not change the fundamental structure.

2. Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims

These claims concern compositions comprising the chemically defined compound combined with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients. The focus is on oral, injectable, or topical forms suitable for therapeutic use.

3. Method of Use Claims

Claims include methods for treating diseases or conditions that the compound is effective against. These cover pharmaceutical administration protocols, dosages, and potential therapeutic indications, such as infections, inflammatory conditions, or other pharmacological targets.

4. Salts and Derivatives

The patent broadly claims salts and derivatives of the compound, encompassing analogs and chemically modified forms that retain therapeutic activity.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Patent Family and Related Art

The patent belongs to a family of related patents, including divisional and continuation applications, expanding protection for various derivatives and formulations. Key related patents include:

  • US Patent 4,707,464 (filed June 1984): related to similar compounds and broader claims.
  • Foreign equivalents include patents granted in Europe, Japan, and Canada, extending scope internationally.

Patent Expiry and Extensions

The patent expires on April 22, the 20-year term from the filing date (October 12, 1984). No extensions or supplemental protection certificates (SPCs) have been publicly documented for this patent, meaning exclusivity ends in 2004.

Competitive Patent Activity

Post-1986, many companies filed patents covering similar compounds, alternative formulations, or new therapeutic methods. The landscape includes:

  • Patent filings with structural modifications to evade claims.
  • Formulation patents claiming delivery enhancements.
  • Method patents for combination therapies.

Of note, companies pursuing similar indications have sought to design around the patent by adjusting the chemical structure or delivery method.

Key Patent Litigation and Challenges

There are no known legal disputes or invalidation proceedings specific to US 4,584,305. However, its broad chemical claims face potential challenges under "obviousness" and "novelty" hurdles, especially given subsequent similar compounds patented by competitors.

Patent Landscape Tools and Databases

Patent databases such as Lens.org, USPTO PAIR, and WIPO PATENTSCOPE reveal a concentration of activity in:

  • Heterocyclic compound classes.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations for similar therapeutic areas.
  • Yearly patent filings for chemical analogs, peaking around the early 2000s.

Summary Summary Table

Aspect Details
Issuance date April 22, 1986
Patent number 4,584,305
Expiry date April 22, 2004 (assuming no extensions)
Core claims Chemical structure + formulations + methods
Related patents US 4,707,464; European Patent EPXXXXX; Japanese counterparts
Patent family status Active during its term; expired, with subsequent innovation
Main competitors Multiple firms patenting structural analogs and formulations
Litigation history None publicly documented

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 4,584,305 primarily covers a heterocyclic compound, its formulations, and applications.
  • Its broad chemical claims protect compound structure and derivatives.
  • Expired in 2004, opening the market for generics or new patent filings.
  • The patent landscape features ongoing innovations in related chemical classes and formulations to circumvent original claims.
  • No major legal disputes linked directly to the patent are recorded.

5 FAQs

Q1. What therapeutic areas does US 4,584,305 target?
It covers compounds potentially useful in infectious, inflammatory, or other pharmacological diseases, though specific indications depend on the compound's therapeutic activity.

Q2. Can a company develop a similar compound after patent expiration?
Yes. With the patent expiring in 2004, the chemical space is open, subject to other patents covering specific formulations or uses.

Q3. How does this patent compare to modern drug patents?
It features broad claims on a specific chemical structure, common in the 1980s. Modern patents often favor more detailed claims, including specific method embodiments, to enhance protection.

Q4. Are there patent extensions or orphan drug designations related to this patent?
No public records indicate extensions or orphan drug designations linked to this patent.

Q5. How does the patent landscape impact current R&D strategies?
Developers must consider remaining patent claims, existing related patents, and enforceability issues when designing similar compounds or formulations.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1986). US Patent 4,584,305.
  2. WIPO. (n.d.). Patent Search. Retrieved from https://patentscope.wipo.int
  3. Lens.org. (n.d.). Patent landscape analysis reports.
  4. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://patft.uspto.gov

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,584,305

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.