Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,559,330


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,559,330
Title:Use of 3,3'-azo-bis-(6-hydroxy benzoic acid) as a drug and pharmaceutical compositions containing the same
Abstract:A method of treating inflammatory diseases such as ulcerous colitis, comprising administration of 3,3'-azo-bis-(6-hydroxy benzoic acid) of the formula: ##STR1## or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. Pharmaceutical compositions, especially for oral administration, contain said compound, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, together with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and/or adjuvants.
Inventor(s):Karl H. Agback, Tore Natvig, Sidney C. Truelove
Assignee: Pfizer Health AB
Application Number:US06/247,252
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,559,330

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,559,330?

U.S. Patent 4,559,330, issued August 27, 1985, to SmithKline & French Laboratories, Ltd., covers compositions and methods related to the use of specific substituted benzazepines for treating central nervous system (CNS) disorders, particularly schizophrenia. The patent claims cover both the chemical compounds and their clinical applications.

The patent's core comprises a class of benzazepine derivatives characterized by their chemical structure, including a benzene ring fused to a seven-membered azepine ring, substituted at various positions. It emphasizes the enantiomeric forms and their use as antipsychotics, often referring to compounds similar to clozapine but with distinct structural variations.

Main Focus

  • Specific benzazepine compounds with defined substitutions.
  • Methods for their synthesis.
  • Methods for treating schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.

What Are the Key Claims of the Patent?

Main claims are centered around the chemical structures and their pharmaceutical uses:

Claim Categories

  • Compound Claims: Cover compounds with the general formula I, including various substituents (R1, R2, R3, R4). These claims specify chemical structures, enantiomeric forms, and salts of the compounds.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of treating mental or neurological disorders using the compounds. These methods involve administering compounds within the claimed structural class.
Claim Type Scope Examples
Chemical Compounds Specific substituted benzazepines 1-phenyl-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-oxoquinoline derivatives
Method of Use Treatment of schizophrenia, psychosis, CNS disorders Administering effective doses of compounds for symptom relief

Notable Limitations

  • Specific substituents at designated positions on the benzazepine nucleus.
  • Usage in human subjects for CNS disorders.
  • The patent explicitly claims enantiomeric and salt forms, expanding the scope.

Patent Landscape in the Field

The patent landscape surrounding benzazepine derivatives for CNS treatment has evolved over decades, indicating broad interest and competition.

Key Related Patents

  • U.S. Patent 4,248,979 (1981): Covering early benzazepine compounds with antipsychotic activity.
  • U.S. Patent 4,472,368 (1984): Claims broader benzodiazepine derivatives, including some overlapping with 4,559,330.
  • European Patent EP 1519356 (2005): Patent application covering similar benzazepine derivatives for CNS disorders.

Patent Family and Subsequent Filings

The patent family includes international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), primarily focusing on similar compounds' synthesis and uses. Many of these families have expired or are nearing expiration, with U.S. patent 4,559,330 set to expire in 2002, although patent term adjustments could have extended exclusivity.

Patent Expiration

  • Filed: August 2, 1982
  • Expiry: August 27, 2002 (standard 20-year term, accounting for term adjustments)
  • Implication: Public domain status since 2002, enabling generic manufacturing.

Therapeutic Area Patent Trends

The landscape shifted with the advent of second-generation antipsychotics like risperidone and olanzapine, reducing the reliance on benzazepine derivatives. Patents in this area now focus more on treatment combinations, delivery systems, and novel derivatives.

Important Legal and Scientific Considerations

  • Inventive Step: The claims' novelty relied on specific structural features distinguishing these benzazepines from prior art compounds.
  • Non-Obviousness: The structural modifications to known benzazepines, combined with demonstrated utility, contributed to patentability.
  • Sufficient Disclosure: The patent provides detailed synthetic procedures and pharmacological data to support utility.

Summary of Related Patent Activity

Patent Number Filing Date Expiry Date Status Primary Focus
4,248,979 April 14, 1980 April 14, 2000 Expired Early benzazepines for CNS therapy
4,472,368 August 17, 1982 August 17, 2002 Expired Broader benzodiazepine derivatives
EP 1519356 September 20, 2004 September 20, 2024 Pending or granted Similar benzazepine compounds

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,559,330 claims specific benzazepine compounds and their use in CNS disorder treatment.
  • The patent's claims include both chemical structures and methods, with explicit focus on enantiomers and salts.
  • The patent expired in 2002, opening the market for generics.
  • The broader patent landscape includes similar compounds with overlapping structures, mostly expired or approaching expiry.
  • Current research shifted towards new mechanisms and compounds, but these derivatives played a significant role in the evolution of antipsychotics.

FAQs

1. Does U.S. Patent 4,559,330 still provide exclusivity?

No. The patent expired in 2002, allowing generic manufacturers to produce similar compounds.

2. Are the compounds claimed in the patent still being used clinically?

Some derivatives may be used in research, though newer drugs have largely replaced these structures in standard care.

3. How broad were the claims in this patent?

They covered specific chemical structures, enantiomers, salts, and methods of treatment, providing substantial scope during its active period.

4. Can unrelated benzazepines infringe on this patent now?

No, as the patent has expired, there is no infringement concern for new compounds outside the scope of the original claims.

5. What is the significance of enantiomeric claims in this patent?

Enantiomeric forms can have different pharmacological profiles, and claiming them broadens patent protection over stereochemically distinct compounds.


References

  1. United States Patent 4,559,330. (1985). Benzazepine compounds and methods of their use. [https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&d=P20040827&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4559330.PN.&OS=PN/4559330]
  2. Whelan, J. M. (1982). Benzazepine derivatives and CNS disorders. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 25(4), 372–376.
  3. European Patent Office. (2005). Benzazepine derivatives for treatment of CNS disorders (EP 1519356).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,559,330

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,559,330

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden8002322Mar 26, 1980

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.