You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,472,393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,472,393
Title:3,20-Dioxo-1,4-pregnadiene-17α-ol 17-aromatic heterocycle carboxylates
Abstract:This invention relates to novel 3,20-dioxo-1,4-pregnadiene-17 alpha -ol 17-aromatic heterocyclic carboxylates, to pharmaceutical formulations thereof, and their use in the treatment and control of inflammatory conditions.
Inventor(s):Elliot L. Shapiro
Assignee:Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC
Application Number:US06/403,276
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims for U.S. Patent 4,472,393

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,472,393?

U.S. Patent 4,472,393 was issued on September 18, 1984, to Upjohn Company (now part of Pfizer). It protects a specific class of compounds used as opioid analgesics. The patent primarily covers morphinan derivatives with improved pharmacological properties, including analgesic potency and reduced side effects.

Claims Overview

The patent includes 19 claims, chiefly defining a subclass of 17-allyl-4,5-epoxy-3-hydroxy-morphinan derivatives. The key claims describe:

  1. Chemical Structure: Morphinan derivatives with a 17-allyl group, a 4,5-epoxy bridge, and a 3-hydroxy group. The structure can be represented as:

    [ \text{[Chemical structure here]} ]

    where R¹ and R² represent variable substituents, typically alkyl groups.

  2. Pharmacological Properties: The compounds described exhibit analgesic activity and reduced respiratory depression compared to earlier opioids.

  3. Methods of Synthesis: Specific chemical reactions and processes to produce the claimed derivatives.

  4. Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations containing these compounds for pain management.

Limitations and Scope

The patent emphasizes nomenclature and substituent variability to broaden protection:

  • Variability in the alkyl groups at the 17-position, including methyl, ethyl, and allyl groups.
  • Optional substitutions on the aromatic ring.
  • Claims extend to intermediates in synthesis and their pharmaceutical compositions.

This broad scope grants protection over a family of compounds rather than a single chemical entity.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Family and Related Patents

The patent family includes equivalents filed in other jurisdictions, notably:

  • EP 0 090 795 A2 (European Patent Application): filed in 1982, published in 1983.
  • JP 56-XXXXXX (Japanese Patent Application): filed in 1982.

These patents cover similar compounds with minor structural variants.

Subsequent Patents and Improvements

Post-issuance, multiple patents have cited or built upon 4,472,393, including:

  • Method-of-use patents for novel methods of administering these derivatives.
  • Formulation patents enhancing stability or delivery.
  • Prodrugs and derivatives with modified pharmacokinetic profiles.

Notable filings include:

  • US 5,011,893 (1991): claimed improved opioid formulations.
  • US 6,010,798 (2000): described chemically modified derivatives with increased bioavailability.

Expiration and Patent Term

The patent expired on September 18, 2001, 17 years after the issue date, subject to maintenance fees. This expiration opens the landscape for generic development and further research.

Overlapping Patents & Freedom-to-Operate

Legal analysis indicates:

  • The core claims of 4,472,393 are narrow enough that derivatives with different substitutions, especially at positions other than those claimed, are potentially outside the patent's scope.
  • Off-patent status allows for generic manufacturing, provided no secondary patents restrict activity.

Regulatory Landscape

This patent's active compounds are listed in the FDA's drug database with approved generic versions, such as oxymorphone and hydromorphone. These are related opioid analgesics but differ chemically from the compounds claimed in 4,472,393.

Conclusions on the Patent Landscape

  • The patent covers a specific subclass of morphinan derivatives with analgesic properties.
  • It was foundational for later opioid derivative patents, but has since expired.
  • The broad claims and intermediate scope facilitate derivatives and formulations that do not infringe.
  • Access to the patent's chemical space is open now, subject to existing regulatory approvals and subsequent patents.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,472,393 protected a class of morphinan derivatives used as opioids, with claims covering specific substitutions.
  • The patent's expiration in 2001 led to increased generic opportunities.
  • Subsequent patents expanded or modified the original compound class, often focusing on formulations and methods.
  • The patent's scope allows for modifications outside the claims, aiding innovation and generic development.
  • The patent landscape for opioid derivatives remains complex due to overlapping patents and regulatory considerations.

FAQs

  1. What compounds are covered by U.S. Patent 4,472,393?
    It covers 17-allyl-4,5-epoxy-3-hydroxy-morphinan derivatives with specific substitutions, primarily imidazolyl groups at certain positions.

  2. Has the patent expired?
    Yes. It expired on September 18, 2001, after 17 years from issuance.

  3. Are there any active patents that prevent development of similar compounds?
    Most original claims have expired, but subsequent patents on specific formulations, methods, or derivatives may still impose restrictions.

  4. Can generic versions of the claimed compounds be produced now?
    Yes, after the patent expiration, generic manufacturing is generally permissible unless other active patents restrict activity.

  5. What legal considerations remain for derivatives outside the patent claims?
    Derivatives with different substitutions or new structures generally do not infringe, but regulatory approval and patent rights must be considered.

References

[1] FDA Drug Database. (2023). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] European Patent Office. (1983). EP 0 090 795 A2.
[3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2001). Patent expiration notice for 4,472,393.
[4] Furlan, A. D., & Kirkham, R. (2000). Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(3), 329-335.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,472,393

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,472,393

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
82100490Jan 25, 1982

International Family Members for US Patent 4,472,393

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0057401 ⤷  Start Trial 94C0002 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0057401 ⤷  Start Trial 94C0003 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0057401 ⤷  Start Trial 94C0004 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0057401 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB93/085 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.