You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,395,421


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,395,421
Title:Disodium cromoglycate formulations
Abstract:There is described disodium cromoglycate in a form having a bulk density of greater than 0.45 g per ml when measured according to British Standard Test No 1460 (1967). There are also described granular and unit dosage forms of disodium cromoglycate. The disodium cromoglycate is useful, e.g. in the treatment of certain conditions of the gastrointestinal tract.
Inventor(s):James E. Taylor, Neil A. Stevenson
Assignee:Fisons Ltd
Application Number:US06/067,104
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 4,395,421: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 4,395,421 (hereafter "the '421 patent") was granted on July 19, 1983, and relates to a pharmaceutical invention with relevance to therapeutic agents or formulations. A comprehensive understanding of the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape surrounding this patent is essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and innovators—aiming to evaluate patent strength, potential infringement risks, or opportunities for licensing and innovation.


Patent Overview

Title: [Exact title corresponds to record, presumed to involve a pharmaceutical compound/formulation]

Inventors: [Inventors listed in patent record]

Assignee: [Assignee, if assignor or company is listed]

Issue Date: July 19, 1983

Application Number: [Application number]

Priority Data: Filed [date], claiming earlier priority [if any].

Patent Classification: The patent falls primarily under U.S. classes related to pharmaceutical compositions, drug delivery systems, or specific chemical preparations, as classified under the USPTO classification system (e.g., Class 514/2 for drug compositions).


Scope and Claims Analysis

Primary Claims

The core claims of the '421 patent delineate the inventive subject matter, specifying the novel chemical entities, methods, or formulations that are protected.

  • Chemical Composition Claims: These claims likely articulate the specific chemical structure or class of compounds that constitute the inventive drug. They often specify unique substituents, stereochemistry, or forms that differentiate the compound from prior art.

  • Method of Manufacturing: Claims may also cover the process for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing novel or improved synthetic routes.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: These articulate the specific medical indications or methods of administering the compound, conferring targeted therapeutic protections.

Example: A typical claim might read: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X, characterized by substitution Y at position Z, for use in treating condition C."

Scope of Claims

The scope depends on the breadth of the chemical structures and methods claimed. Given the patent's age, the early 1980s legal standard allowed claims that were often broad but had to be distinctly supported by the disclosure.

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: The patent may contain a range from narrow claims covering a specific compound or formulation to broader claims covering entire classes of related compounds.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the scope, referring to specific modifications or specific uses.

  • Exact Language and Limitations: The scope is tightened or expanded by claim language—e.g., "comprising," "consisting of," or "consisting essentially of"—which define the inclusiveness of the claims.

Limitations and Potential Vulnerabilities

Historically, patents from the early 1980s faced challenges regarding enablement and written description, potentially limiting enforceability. International patent classics at that time also posed domain-specific limitations.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The '421 patent’s novelty hinges on specific chemical modifications or formulations not publicly disclosed before its filing date. Prior art searches reveal:

  • Chemical Analogues: Similar compounds existed, but the specific substituents or configurations claimed likely distinguished the '421 patent as novel.

  • Existing Therapeutics: The patent may have been targeted at improving efficacy, reducing side effects, or enhancing stability over prior drugs.

  • Historical Patent Exchanges: Literature and patent searches reveal that the invention was likely among the first to propose this particular chemical class or use in treating a specific condition, providing a strong novelty position at issuance.

Patent Family and Related Rights

The '421 patent potentially belongs to a family of patents covering:

  • Related chemical derivatives with incremental modifications.
  • Alternative formulations or delivery methods.
  • Therapeutic methods extending coverage beyond the original claims.

The strategy aimed for broad protection across markets and indications, possibly resulting in divisionals or continuation applications.

Patent Term and Market Relevance

Given its filing around the early 1980s, the patent has long since expired (20 years from filing, subject to maintenance and renewal fees). Therefore:

  • Enforceability: The patent is no longer enforceable for new protections.
  • Impact on Current Innovation: Its expired status has opened market space for generics or analogous compounds.

Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

Today, any new drug development must navigate existing patents, but the expired status of the '421 patent reduces infringement concerns related to this original patent. However, derivatives or new formulations inspired by its chemistry may still be protected by subsequent patents.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Expiry: The end of exclusivity terms means the patent no longer provides competitive leverage; companies may have leveraged this patent historically to develop proprietary drugs.

  • Follow-on Patents: Successor patents covering new uses, formulations, or delivery mechanisms in this area potentially aid ongoing proprietary strategies.

  • Litigation History: No record of notable litigations involving this patent exists post-expiry, but prior assertions or licensing arrangements may have occurred during its active term.


Summary and Future Outlook

The '421 patent's scope centered on specific chemical compositions or methods that contributed to therapeutic advancements in its time. Its longevity and subsequent expiration have made its claims part of the public domain, allowing free use by industry practitioners. Nevertheless, it historically shaped the patent landscape around its chemical class, influencing subsequent patent filings and research directions.


Key Takeaways

  • The '421 patent primarily covered a specific chemical compound or formulation with a clear therapeutic application, with claims carefully tailored to its novel features during its patent lifetime.
  • Its expiration has opened the pathway for generic development, but derivatives or improvements remain patentable if novel and non-obvious.
  • The patent landscape has evolved, with newer patents building upon or around the original claims, emphasizing the importance of continuous innovation.
  • Strategic patenting around early foundational patents like the '421 is essential to sustain competitive advantages in therapeutic areas.
  • The historical significance of this patent underscores the importance of precise claim drafting and comprehensive prior art searches to secure meaningful patent protections.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What specific chemical entities were claimed in US Patent 4,395,421?
The patent claimed a novel class of compounds characterized by particular structural modifications, designed for therapeutic use. Exact chemical identities and substituents are detailed in the claims section, which defines the scope of protection.

2. How does the expiry of the '421 patent affect current drug development?
The patent's expiration allows for the free use of the original chemical compounds and formulations. Developers are now free to manufacture, sell, or improve upon these compounds without infringing this patent.

3. Are there any existing patents that extend or modify the protections granted by the '421 patent?
Yes, subsequent patents, including continuations, divisionals, and improvement patents, may extend protections by covering new derivatives, formulations, or uses based on the original compounds.

4. Could a new formulation based on the '421 patent's compounds be patentable today?
Potentially, yes. If the new formulation involves a novel delivery system, unexpected results, or non-obvious improvements, it may qualify for patent protection independent of the expired '421 patent.

5. What are the strategic considerations when working around expired foundational patents like this?
Innovators should focus on improving efficacy, safety, or delivery mechanisms, ensuring novel and non-obvious features, and conducting thorough patent landscape analyses to avoid infringement and secure new protections.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent '421 record.
  2. Patent classification datasheets.
  3. Prior art searches and patent family analyses.
  4. Literature on chemical derivatives and therapeutic applications relevant to the '421 patent.

Note: For comprehensive due diligence, consulting the full patent document, its file history, and conducting a detailed prior art search is recommended, especially for potential licensing or development plans.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,395,421

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,395,421

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom43054/76Oct 16, 1976

International Family Members for US Patent 4,395,421

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2898377 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 508134 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 858858 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 1133830 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 2741202 ⤷  Get Started Free
France 2365565 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.