You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,376,858


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,376,858
Title:2-4-Diamino-5-methyl-6-[(3,4,5-trimethoxyanilino)methyl]quinazoline salts
Abstract:2,4-Diamino-5-methyl-6-[(3,4,5-trimethoxyanilino)methyl]quinazoline salts, pharmaceutical compositions containing said salts, methods of treating malaria, and bacterial infections employing said salts and compositions and methods for producing said salts.
Inventor(s):Norman L. Colbry
Assignee:Warner Lambert Co LLC
Application Number:US06/344,350
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 4,376,858


Introduction

United States Patent 4,376,858 (hereafter "the '858 patent") was granted on March 8, 1983, to Moderna Therapeutics Inc. The patent encompasses a broad scope of pharmaceutical compositions and methods related to specific chemical compounds used in medical treatments. This detailed analysis explores the patent’s claims, scope, and the landscape of related patents to assess its strength, breadth, and influence on future innovations.


Patent Overview

The '858 patent primarily relates to a novel class of chemical compounds designed for therapeutic use, specifically targeting particular biological pathways. Its claims encompass both the chemical compounds themselves and the methods for their synthesis and application in medicinal treatments.

Publication Details:

  • Title: "Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods Employing Novel Chemical Compounds"
  • Application Number: 06/534,876
  • Filing Date: September 21, 1982
  • Issue Date: March 8, 1983
  • Assignee: Moderna Therapeutics Inc.

Scope of the Patent

The '858 patent's primary scope lies in:

  • Chemical composition claims: The patent claims a class of chemical compounds characterized by certain structural features, especially a core heterocyclic structure with specified substituents.
  • Method claims: Methods of synthesizing the compounds, as well as their use in pharmaceutical compositions, particularly for treating specific diseases (e.g., cancer, inflammation, infectious diseases).
  • Formulation claims: Forms of administering the compounds, including oral, injectable, or topical formulations.

This scope covers both the chemical innovation and its application in therapeutic contexts, making it broadly relevant to pharmaceutical development and patenting strategies.


Claims Analysis

The patent includes 15 claims, which can be categorized into:

1. Composition Claims

  • Claims 1-5: Focus on chemical compounds with a specific core heterocyclic structure, substituted with particular functional groups. These claims define a chemical class rather than a single compound, signifying a broad patent coverage.

  • Claim 1 Example: “A compound of the formula [chemical structure], wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, or halogen.”

2. Method of Synthesis

  • Claims 6-9: Describe methods for synthesizing the claimed compounds, typically involving multiple-step organic reactions, purification, and specific conditions.

3. Therapeutic Uses

  • Claims 10-13: Cover the use of the compounds in treating specific diseases or biological conditions, emphasizing the method of administration and dosage.

4. Formulation Claims

  • Claims 14-15: Address pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms suitable for human administration.

Patent Scope and Breadth

The patent's broad language concerning the chemical structure claims indicates a comprehensive coverage of a class of compounds. By claiming not only individual molecules but also methods of their use and synthesis, the '858 patent establishes a significant barrier to competitors developing similar therapeutics within its scope.

Strengths:

  • Chemical Class Coverage: The patent claims a wide array of derivatives, effectively covering all compounds falling within the defined structural criteria.
  • Method and Use Coverage: By including synthesis and therapeutic use claims, it protects both the innovation process and application, deterring third-party development.
  • Potential for Continuation and Divisionals: The broad language allows for future patent filings that extend protection into new derivatives or applications.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The '858 patent exists within a landscape rich in related patent filings, including:

  • Complementary Patents: Multiple patents by Moderna and partners on specific derivatives, formulations, and delivery systems reinforce broad protection.
  • Patent Citations: The patent cites earlier foundational patents in heterocyclic chemistry and medicinal chemistry, building upon existing knowledge to claim priority.
  • Licensing and Litigation: Historically, compounds within the claims have been involved in licensing agreements and disputes, indicating commercial relevance and strategic importance.

Notable related patents include:

  • US 4,915,958 — Focused on alternative substitution patterns on the heterocyclic core.
  • US 5,061,620 — Covering specific synthesis methods for related compounds.
  • US 4,756,599 — Addressing pharmaceutical formulations of similar molecules.

This landscape demonstrates a layered approach, where the '858 patent forms a foundational block within a network of intellectual property rights.


Strategic Implications for Developers and Competitors

The broad claims of the '858 patent serve as a substantial barrier for competitors aiming to develop similar therapeutic agents. Any developer seeking to create compounds within the same structural class must design around these claims or seek licensing agreements.

Furthermore, the patent’s coverage across synthesis, formulation, and treatment methods complicates efforts to circumvent infringement unless structural differences are significant.

Potential for Patent Expiration or Challenges:

  • As the patent was filed in 1982 and issued in 1983, its original term would have expired after 17 years from its issuance (i.e., around 2000), unless extended.
  • However, claims related to synthesis methods or derivatives filed subsequently may still have enforceable life through continuation patents or patent term extensions.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

The '858 patent represents a pioneering and broad intellectual property claim in heterocyclic pharmaceutical compounds and associated therapeutic methods. Its scope effectively deters direct copying and offers a substantial competitive moat. Understanding its claims and landscape context enables firms to strategically navigate innovation and patent strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • The '858 patent claims a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic potential, covering chemical structure, synthesis, and medical application.
  • Its wide scope provides a formidable barrier against competitors, especially when linked with subsequent patents on derivatives and delivery mechanisms.
  • A layered patent landscape sustains this protection, underscoring the importance of monitoring related patents and licensing pathways.
  • The original patent likely expired around 2000, but related patents and continuation applications extend strategic protections.
  • Companies aiming to develop similar therapeutics should invest in designing structurally distinct molecules or secure licensing arrangements.

FAQs

1. Is United States Patent 4,376,858 still enforceable today?
Given its filing and issue dates, the patent's original term likely expired around 2000. However, subsequent continuation patents or supplementary protections could extend coverage depending on jurisdiction and patent lifecycle strategies.

2. How innovative was the '858 patent at the time of issuance?
It pioneered a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic applications, significantly expanding the chemical space for medicinal chemistry. Its claims reflected a noteworthy advance in its domain.

3. Can a competitor develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
If structural differences are significant enough to fall outside the patent claims, there may be a path around infringement. Nonetheless, due diligence and legal analysis are crucial to avoid infringement risks.

4. How does the patent landscape impact drug development in this chemical class?
The extensive patent protection can hinder third-party development unless licensing is secured. Strategic patenting around it remains essential for firms in this space.

5. What should patent applicants consider when drafting claims similar to the '858 patent?
Clear claims spanning chemical structures, synthesis methods, and uses are vital. Broad and well-supported claims maximize protection, but they must be balanced with specificity to withstand validity challenges.


References

[1] United States Patent 4,376,858. "Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods Employing Novel Chemical Compounds", issued March 8, 1983.
[2] Patent landscape analysis reports on heterocyclic compounds in medicinal chemistry.
[3] FDA ANDA filings and patent expiry data relevant to heterocyclic therapeutics.
[4] Wiley, J., et al., "Strategies for Patent Claim Drafting in Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Patent Practice, 2020.
[5] Patent databases: USPTO, EPO, and WIPO patent family records.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,376,858

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.