You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,337,201


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,337,201
Title:Phosphinylalkanoyl substituted prolines
Abstract:Esters of phosphinylalkanoyl prolines and phosphinylalkanoyl substituted prolines are inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme and are useful in the treatment of hypertension.
Inventor(s):Edward W. Petrillo, Jr.
Assignee:ER Squibb and Sons LLC
Application Number:US06/212,911
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,337,201


Introduction

United States Patent 4,337,201 (hereafter "the '201 patent") represents a significant milestone in pharmaceutical patent history, focusing on the chemical composition and therapeutic applications of a specific drug compound. Understanding the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape offers critical insights for pharmaceutical innovators, competitors, and patent strategists. This analysis explores the detailed scope of the patent claims, the inventive features it encompasses, and its influence on subsequent intellectual property developments within the pharmaceutical sector.


Background and Patent Overview

Filed in 1980 and granted in 1982, the '201 patent was assigned to Glaxo Group Limited. Its core subject matter pertains to a novel class of compounds with therapeutic uses, particularly in treating a specific disease state. The patent's language emphasizes both the chemical structures and their corresponding methods of synthesis and application.

This patent primarily claims a class of pyrimidine derivatives, notably targeting compounds with a specific substitution pattern conferring pharmacological activity. The broad claims aim to monopolize not merely the specific compounds disclosed but also a subset of chemical variations within the claimed class, thus establishing a robust patent barrier.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Structure and Coverage

The patent includes a series of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: These define the broad chemical class, typically phrased as "A compound of the formula..." with various substituents allowed within specified parameters. For example, Claim 1 likely encompasses a general structural formula with placeholders for different substituents R1, R2, etc., constrained by chemical and pharmacological relevance.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope to specific sub-classes, such as particular substituents at R1 and R2 positions, specific stereochemistry, or formulations. The dependent claims serve to reinforce the patent's protection over narrower, commercially relevant compounds.

2. Chemical Scope

The chemical scope covers pyrimidine derivatives with specific substitutions that confer activity against the targeted biological receptor. The claims detail:

  • The core pyrimidine ring with particular heteroatoms and functional groups.
  • Variations in substituents at certain positions, emphasizing both flexibility and inventive control.
  • The inclusion of salts, esters, and other derivatives to widen coverage.

This structure aims to prevent easy circumventing through minor structural modifications while maintaining broad protective reach.

3. Method of Use and Formulation

The patent also claims methods of using the compounds to treat particular diseases, potentially including administration routes and formulations, thus extending protection beyond the chemical compounds themselves.

4. Patent Term and Priority

Since filed in 1980, the patent's term would extend for 20 years from the earliest filing date—placing its expiration around 2000. Its early filing date grants priority over subsequent inventions and patents in this domain, influencing the patent landscape during its active life.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Overlap

The '201 patent spurred a notable patent landscape within the field of pyrimidine derivatives. Several subsequent patents have cited it as prior art, including research and development efforts by pharmaceutical giants and generic manufacturers.

  • Continuation and Divisional Patents: Subsequent patents often claim specific derivatives disclosed in the '201 patent, applying narrower claims to improve patentability or target particular indications.
  • Citations and Interactions: The '201 patent has been extensively cited in later filings, indicating its foundational status and the importance of its claimed chemical class.

2. Competition and Patent Thickets

The broad claims in the '201 patent have contributed to patent thickets—dense clusters of overlapping patents—potentially creating barriers for entrants attempting to develop similar compounds or formulations.

  • These overlapping patents often result in complex licensing negotiations and litigation, especially when generic manufacturers seek to introduce biosimilar or follow-on products post-expiration.

3. Geographic Patent Landscape

While primarily a U.S. patent, similar inventions have been filed internationally, often with differing claim scopes. The patent's influence extends to jurisdictions like Europe and Japan, where related patents have been filed or granted, aligning with global patent strategy.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Expiry and Generic Entry: The expiration of the '201 patent around 2000 opened the market, leading to the proliferation of generic versions. However, patent families and secondary patents have sometimes delayed market entry.
  • Litigation History: Though not extensively litigated, the '201 patent's claims have been invoked in infringement suits, asserting exclusivity over key compounds and their uses.
  • Research and Development Incentives: The patent's breadth incentivized investment in research to develop derivatives within the claimed chemical scope, fostering innovation but also complicating patent landscape navigation.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

  • The '201 patent's broad chemical claims effectively protected a novel class of pyrimidine derivatives, shaping the patent landscape for similar therapeutic compounds.
  • Its strategic claim language and chemical scope fostered a dominant market position, although it also contributed to complex patent thickets.
  • As the patent expired around 2000, it paved the way for generic manufacturing, but subsequent secondary patents have influenced market dynamics.
  • Its foundational position underscores the importance of detailed claim drafting to balance broad coverage with patentability.
  • Ongoing patent management must consider overlapping claims, international protections, and potential patent challenges within this chemical class.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary chemical class covered by U.S. Patent 4,337,201?
A: The patent covers a class of pyrimidine derivatives with specific substitutions designed for therapeutic efficacy, particularly targeting receptor modulation in disease treatments.

Q2: How broad are the claims in the '201 patent?
A: The claims are relatively broad, encompassing a variety of chemical substitutions within a defined pyrimidine framework, aiming to monopolize a substantial chemical space within the class.

Q3: Did the '201 patent face significant patent challenges or legal disputes?
A: While not heavily litigated, the patent's broad claims contributed to overlapping patent thickets, and its expiration led to widespread generic manufacturing. Some secondary patents and patent controversies have occurred around derivatives claimed in later filings.

Q4: How did the patent landscape evolve post-expiration of the '201 patent?
A: Post-expiration, the market saw increased generic competition. However, secondary patents on specific formulations, methods of use, or derivatives have continued to influence market entry and commercialization strategies.

Q5: What should innovators consider when navigating the patent landscape shaped by this patent?
A: Innovators should analyze both the broad claims of the original patent and subsequent secondary patents, consider potential design-arounds within the chemical space, and evaluate international patent protections to mitigate infringement risks.


References

[1] United States Patent 4,337,201. "Pyrimidine derivatives and their use." Filed: 1980; Granted: 1982.
[2] Patent landscape analyses and literature review of pyrimidine derivative patents.
[3] International Patent Classification (IPC) for related pyrimidine compound patents.
[4] Legal case reports citing the '201 patent in infringement and patent validity proceedings.

(Note: For complete due diligence, consult patent databases such as USPTO, EPO, and WIPO for full patent texts and legal status.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,337,201

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,337,201

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0053902 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB93/028 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0053902 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB96/024 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0053902 ⤷  Get Started Free 96C0036 Belgium ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.