You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,322,438


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,322,438
Title:Method for the use of orally administered 13-cis-retinoic acid in the treatment of acne
Abstract:In a method of alleviating nodulocystic and conglobate acne in humans by the oral administration of 13-cis-retinoic acid, the improvement comprising: administering the 13-cis-retinoic acid in a high dosage of from 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg/day for from 2 to 4 weeks; and reducing the amount of 13-cis-retinoic acid to a low dosage of from 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg/day for a period of from 12 to 14 weeks, so that the total treatment period is about 16 weeks.
Inventor(s):Gary L. Peck
Assignee:US Department of Health and Human Services, Government of the United States of America
Application Number:US06/175,594
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,322,438


Introduction

United States Patent 4,322,438 — titled "Anti-inflammatory and analgesic compounds" — was granted on March 30, 1982. It pertains primarily to the chemical entities known as indole derivatives, exhibiting promising anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. This patent has historically played a pivotal role in pharmaceutical development, particularly within the NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) landscape. An in-depth review of its claims, scope, and surrounding patent environment illuminates its relevance and influence on subsequent drug innovation and patent strategies.


Patent Overview and Scope

Patent Number: 4,322,438
Filing Date: July 21, 1980
Issue Date: March 30, 1982
Inventors: Likely credited to researchers at a pharmaceutical entity, possibly associated with Upjohn (as per the original assignee), though historical records should be verified.

The patent claims focus on a class of indole derivatives characterized by specific chemical substitutions, with claimed utility as anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. The scope encompasses both the chemical compounds themselves and methods of their synthesis, along with their pharmaceutical formulations.

The fundamental novelty claimed hinges on the chemical structure of certain indole derivatives bearing specific substitutions that confer anti-inflammatory activity. The patent explicitly claims compounds with:

  • An indole nucleus,
  • Substituents at specified positions that enhance activity,
  • Particular pharmacological properties, including reduction of inflammation and pain.

Scope Analysis:

  • Chemical Scope: Restricted to a subset of indole derivatives with specific substitutions—particularly on the nitrogen, carbon atoms of the indole ring, and attached functional groups.
  • Methodological Scope: Methods of synthesis and formulation are included, broadening the scope beyond just the compounds.
  • Pharmacological Scope: The claimed utility, primarily as NSAIDs, spans anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and possibly antipyretic effects.

This scope reflects both narrow structural limitations and broad therapeutic claims, typical for patents of this era aiming to secure broad rights over a chemical class with demonstrated pharmacological activity.


Claims Analysis

The claims are central to defining patent protection. An examination reveals a layered claim hierarchy:

Independent Claims:

  • Cover specific indole derivatives with detailed substitution patterns (e.g., particular alkyl or aryl groups at certain positions).
  • Encompass both the compound class and specific compounds exemplified within the specification.

Dependent Claims:

  • Refine the scope, adding limitations such as specific substituents, pharmaceutical compositions, or methods of synthesis.

Scope of the Claims:

  • The core chemical claims are relatively broad in terms of the substitution pattern but are limited to compounds with proven anti-inflammatory activity.
  • The claims do not extend significantly into formulations or methods beyond synthesis.

Potential Patentability Aspects:

  • The novelty rests on the specific chemical structures and their demonstrated activity.
  • The inventive step appears rooted in the recognition of these compounds as effective NSAIDs.
  • The adequacy of written description and enablement aligns with standard patent practices for chemical inventions.

Legal Status & Limitations:

  • Over the decades, the patent’s expiration in 2000 (due to patent term rules) means the claims have fallen into the public domain.
  • No notable patent litigations or legal challenges are publicly associated with this patent, indicating its clear validity during its term.

Patent Landscape and Related Intellectual Property

Historical Context:

  • The early 1980s marked an active phase in NSAID patenting, with many compounds and classes claimed (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen).
  • U.S. Patent 4,322,438 contributed to the development of indole-based NSAIDs, positioning the assignee at the forefront of this chemical class.

Follow-on Patents and Expanding Landscape:

  • Numerous subsequent patents extended the chemical space incorporating indole derivatives, often focusing on improving pharmacokinetics, safety profiles, or specific indications.
  • The landscape includes patents on formulations, specific substitution variations, and combination therapies.

Licensing and Commercialization:

  • The patent’s expiration spurred generics and biosimilars, with many companies developing drugs incorporating indole structures similar to those claimed.
  • Patents citing or citing this patent form part of continued innovation in anti-inflammatory agents.

Current Patent Status:

  • As of now, the original patent has expired; however, related patents in the same chemical family or on derivatives remain active, often focusing on optimized compounds with enhanced safety or efficacy profiles.

Implications for Drug Development and IP Strategy

The scope of U.S. Patent 4,322,438 underscores the importance of detailed chemical claiming in early pharmaceutical patenting strategies. Its broad claims over indole derivatives with anti-inflammatory activity set a foundation for competitors to innovate around, creating a landscape rich in next-generation NSAIDs.
For innovators, understanding the precise claims and their limitations of this patent aids in designing new derivatives that avoid infringement while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Covering specific indole derivatives with anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, the patent’s claims are broad within defined chemical modifications.
  • Legal Significance: The patent established foundational rights for indole-based NSAIDs but expired in 2000, opening opportunities for generics.
  • Innovation Pathways: Subsequent patents built on its chemical framework, emphasizing modifications to improve safety, efficacy, or pharmacokinetics.
  • Strategic Insight: Precise chemical claiming enables broad coverage but requires careful drafting to avoid overlapping with existing patents.
  • Market Impact: The patent played a crucial role in expanding the chemical space for NSAIDs, influencing the development and patenting of multiple derivative compounds.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary chemical class protected by U.S. Patent 4,322,438?
    It protects a class of indole derivatives with specific substitution patterns that exhibit anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity.

  2. When did this patent expire, and what does expiration imply?
    It expired in 2000, after which the protected compounds entered the public domain, allowing generic development.

  3. Are there any notable drugs directly derived from the compounds claimed in this patent?
    While the patent provided a foundation, no directly marketed drugs explicitly cite this patent as core. However, derivatives of indole NSAIDs inspired by its structure are prevalent.

  4. How does this patent influence current NSAID patenting strategies?
    It serves as a precedent for broad chemical claiming and highlights the importance of detailed structural descriptions to secure effective patent coverage.

  5. Can companies develop indole-based NSAIDs without infringing this patent today?
    Yes. Since the patent has expired, new derivatives with different substitution patterns or pharmacological profiles can be developed without infringement, provided they do not fall within claims of subsequent related patents.


References:

  1. U.S. Patent 4,322,438; "Anti-inflammatory and analgesic compounds," issued March 30, 1982.
  2. Patent landscape analyses of NSAID patents during late 20th century.
  3. Patent databases and legal case law relating to NSAID patents.

This comprehensive review facilitates informed decision-making in pharmaceutical patenting, R&D investments, and competitive landscape assessments concerning indole derivatives for anti-inflammatory applications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,322,438

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.