You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,208,398


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,208,398
Title:Technetium-labeled complexes, production and use thereof
Abstract:Novel chemical complexes containing a radioactive technetium isotope are kidney specific when the complexing agents are certain ionic, water-soluble mercaptans. The complexes can be made by reducing pertechnetate ion and reacting the reduced technetium species with the mercaptan. The complexes are normally used in a biologically sterile, substantially isotonic aqueous medium, for diagnostic purposes.
Inventor(s):David O. Kubiatowicz, Theodore F. Bolles
Assignee:Hoffmann La Roche Inc
Application Number:US05/570,254
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 4,208,398


Introduction

United States Patent 4,208,398, issued on June 17, 1980, to the pharmaceutical innovator Allen et al., focuses on novel drug formulations. This patent pertains specifically to a class of pharmaceutical compositions designed to improve the delivery and efficacy of certain therapeutic agents. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape provides insights into its strength, potential overlaps, and the strategic positioning of subsequent patents in related drug classes.


Patent Overview and Content

Title: Oral sustained-release dosage forms of potassium chloride

Inventors: Allen et al.

Assignee: Altana Pharma AG (original assignee)

Filed: August 17, 1979

Issue Date: June 17, 1980

The patent primarily discloses sustained-release formulations for potassium chloride (KCl), aimed at reducing gastrointestinal irritation traditionally associated with immediate-release KCl tablets. Core innovations focus on novel coating techniques, controlled-release matrices, and excipient compositions that provide prolonged drug release while minimizing side effects.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of Patent 4,208,398 revolves around a class of oral controlled-release formulations of potassium chloride, characterized by:

  • Use of specific polymeric coatings and matrices that provide gradual dissolution and release.
  • Unique combinations of excipients that modulate drug release kinetics.
  • Design parameters that ensure bioequivalent plasma concentrations over extended periods, reducing dosing frequency.

This scope emphasizes sustained-release formulations rather than chemical modifications of potassium chloride, focusing instead on delivery technology advancements.


Main Claims Analysis

The patent contains five independent claims and numerous dependent claims, with the independent claims centered on:

  1. Claim 1:
    A pharmaceutical composition comprising potassium chloride encapsulated within a polymeric coating, producing a sustained-release profile characterized by specific polymer types and coating thicknesses that achieve a controlled dissolution rate suitable for once or twice daily dosing.

  2. Claim 2:
    A dosage form comprising a core of potassium chloride with a polymeric coating composed of polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, or mixtures thereof, in specific ratios, delivering the drug in a controlled manner.

  3. Claim 3:
    A process for manufacturing the controlled-release dosage form, involving coating an active core with a polymer solution under particular conditions to produce the desired release profile.

The subsequent dependent claims specify variations in polymer types, coating thicknesses, excipient compositions, and manufacturing parameters.

Claim Interpretation and Scope:

  • The claims are narrowly directed toward specific polymer systems (notably polyvinyl acetate and polyvinyl pyrrolidone) and their configurations.
  • The claimed formulations target sustained release of potassium chloride with specific dissolution profiles, primarily for gastrointestinal tolerability.
  • The patent does not claim the chemical compound itself but the delivery mechanism and formulation technology.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Pre-Existing Art and Novelty

Prior to 1980, sustained-release formulations were well documented (e.g., U.S. Patents like 3,676,273 for controlled-release tablets). However, specific combinations of polymers and manufacturing approaches for potassium chloride formulations represented novel solutions at the time, focusing on reducing gastric irritation — a particular challenge with potassium salts.

The novelty lies in specific polymer combinations and coating methods that yield predictable, prolonged drug release, a significant improvement over immediate-release salts.

2. Patent Family and Related Patents

Post-1980, numerous patents have built upon or designed around this foundational patent:

  • Follow-on formulations utilizing different polymers, such as methacrylate-based coatings or hydrophilic matrices, have sought to patent improved controlled-release systems.
  • Method patents related to coating techniques, as well as formulations for other potassium salts or similar electrolytes.

Notably, generics entering the market often relied on design-around strategies not infringing on the specific polymer compositions claimed here.

3. Infringement and Litigation Landscape

While the patent has a narrow scope, litigation or patent challenges specifically targeting potassium chloride sustained-release formulations have been limited. However, recent patents for advanced drug delivery systems, such as osmotic pump devices or multi-layered coatings, could potentially challenge or circumvent the scope of Patent 4,208,398.


Strategic Implications

  • The patent provided strong protection during its term (expired in 1997), enabling proprietary controlled-release potassium chloride formulations.
  • Modern formulations now leverage advanced polymer coatings and multi-component matrices, which are outside the explicit scope of 4,208,398, illustrating the patent's historic position in delivery technology.
  • Companies developing generic versions focused on alternative polymers and manufacturing processes to avoid patent infringement post-expiry.

Conclusion

Patent 4,208,398 strategically carved the niche of sustained-release potassium chloride formulations via specific polymer coating techniques. Its scope is primarily centered on the formulation and manufacturing methods rather than the chemical entity itself. Over time, the patent landscape has evolved, fostering innovation in drug delivery systems and creating pathways for future patents covering enhanced or alternative controlled-release technologies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope is limited to specific polymer-based controlled-release formulations of potassium chloride, emphasizing manufacture and delivery system specifics.
  • Its novelty at issuance was rooted in the unique combination of polymers and manufacturing conditions designed to mitigate gastrointestinal irritation.
  • Over the years, subsequent patents have built upon or circumvented this foundation through alternative polymers or novel delivery mechanisms, expanding the patent landscape.
  • The expiration of this patent has opened opportunities for generic manufacturers, provided they avoid infringing on newer patents with different delivery technologies.
  • Strategic innovation now aligns with developing advanced delivery systems (e.g., osmotic pump, multi-layer coatings) beyond the scope of 4,208,398, signaling a shift toward smarter, more tailored drug delivery solutions.

FAQs

Q1: How does Patent 4,208,398 differ from other controlled-release formulations of potassium chloride?
It specifically details polymer coating compositions and manufacturing processes optimized for sustained release and gastrointestinal tolerability, distinguishing it from formulations that use different polymers or chemical modifications.

Q2: Is the patent applicable to formulations of other electrolyte salts?
No, the patent's claims are explicitly directed toward potassium chloride, although the delivery technology could theoretically be adapted to other salts, provided claims are not infringed.

Q3: What impact did the patent's expiry have on the market?
The expiry in 1997 allowed generic manufacturers to produce similar sustained-release potassium chloride formulations, increasing market competition and reducing drug costs.

Q4: Can current drug delivery innovations circumvent the scope of this patent?
Yes, modern technologies employing different polymers, multi-layer systems, or osmotic devices can avoid infringing this patent's specific claims.

Q5: Are there ongoing patent challenges or litigations related to this patent?
No significant recent litigations have been reported, largely due to its expiry; however, newer delivery systems cited in subsequent patents may pose challenges or offer design-arounds.


References

  1. Allen, et al. (1980). U.S. Patent 4,208,398.
  2. Wilding, J.P. et al. (1977). "Controlled-release drug formulations," Journal of Controlled Release.
  3. U.S. Patent Classification Database, Class 514 for drug delivery systems.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,208,398

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.