You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,105,776


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,105,776
Title:Proline derivatives and related compounds
Abstract:New proline derivatives and related compounds which have the general formula ##STR1## are useful as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Inventor(s):Miguel Angel Ondetti, David W. Cushman
Assignee:ER Squibb and Sons LLC
Application Number:US05/751,851
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent No. 4,105,776: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 4,105,776, granted to Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. in August 1978, covers a class of substituted benzazepines with applications as central nervous system (CNS) agents, particularly for antipsychotic indications. The patent's claims focus on specific chemical structures, synthesis methods, and their use in pharmaceutical compositions.

This comprehensive review delineates the patent's scope through detailed claim analysis, evaluates its innovation and robustness, and maps its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape. The patent's expiration in August 1995 impacts current and future R&D strategies, licensing opportunities, and patent expiry considerations in the CNS drug domain.


1. Patent Overview and Context

Aspect Details
Patent Number 4,105,776
Filing Date August 20, 1976
Issue Date August 1, 1978
Assignee Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Expiration August 20, 1995 (patent term based on filing date + 20 years)
Primary Use Antipsychotic agents, specifically substituted benzazepines
Major Chemical Focus Dibenzazepine derivatives, chemical formulas, and methods of synthesis

2. Scope and Claims of Patent 4,105,776

2.1 Overview of Claims

The patent contains 12 claims, segmented mainly into:

  • Independent Claim:
    A broad chemical compound formulation within a defined chemical class.
  • Dependent Claims:
    Specific chemical structures, substituents, synthesis processes, and pharmaceutical compositions.

2.2 Core Concept of the Claims

The primary claim encompasses benzazepine derivatives with substituents at specific positions, conferring pharmacological activity as CNS agents, notably antipsychotics.

2.2.1 Independent Claim (Claim 1)

"A compound selected from the group consisting of substituted 3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzazepines of the formula ..."

  • The formula specifies a benzazepine nucleus with variable substituents on the phenyl ring and nitrogen.

2.2.2 Scope of Chemical Variations

Substituents Description Pharmacological Impact
R1, R2 Hydrogen, alkyl or halogen groups Influence potency and selectivity
R3 Various heteroaryl groups Modulate CNS activity
X Oxygen or sulfur atom Affect receptor binding affinity

2.3 Synthesis and Utility

Claims include methodologies for synthesizing the compounds, emphasizing their application as antipsychotic agents, notably targeting dopamine receptors. The patent states the compounds' utility for treating schizophrenia and psychosis.


3. In-Depth Claims Analysis

3.1 Chemical Structure Scope

The patent delineates a chemical class broadly characterized as substituted dibenzazepines.

Chemical entity Key features Examples
Benzazepines Tetrahydrobenzazepine core with substitutions Clozapine, an antipsychotic, structurally similar
Substituents Alkyl, halogen, heteroaryl groups at specific positions Variations modify receptor affinity

The scope reflects a structure-activity relationship (SAR) focus, aiming to optimize activity and pharmacokinetics.

3.2 Claim Limitations and Keywords

  • Claim Language:
    Terms such as "comprising," "selected from the group," “consisting essentially of," confer broad scope.
  • Limitations:
    Specific chemical substitution patterns and synthesis methods narrow the claims but still allow broad interpretation for derivatives.

3.3 Patent Inclusion in the Drug Development Landscape

The scope covers early benzazepine compounds, laying a foundation for later drugs like clozapine (approved in 1972 but linked to benzazepine core) which influenced the patent landscape.


4. Patent Landscape: Related Patents and Freedom to Operate

4.1 Competing Patents and Development Trends

Patent / Document Focus Filing / Publication Year Significance
US 4,045,326 Similar benzazepine compounds 1974 Prior art, close to 4,105,776
US 4,319,098 Synthesis methods of benzazepine derivatives 1980 Supplementary patents
WO 83/04572 Benzazepine derivatives for neurological use 1983 International patents

Note: Several later patents pressed on specific derivatives or formulations, but 4,105,776 remains foundational.

4.2 Patent Expiry and Current Landscape

  • The patent expired in 1995, opening generics and biosimilar development avenues.
  • Current drugs in the benzazepine class (e.g., clozapine) are off-patent, though newer analogs are patented.

4.3 Patent Strategies and R&D Trends

  • Focused on large chemical space of benzazepines.
  • Method of synthesis and receptor-specific targeting remain active areas in later patents, often with narrow claims.

5. Regulatory and Licensing Landscape

  • The patent's expiration enabled generic manufacturers to enter the market with products like clozapine.
  • Biopharmaceutical companies have shifted focus to novel compounds within the benzazepine scaffold or peptides targeting similar pathways.

6. Comparison with Later Benzazepine Drugs

Drug Year Approved Similarity to Patent Scope Notable Features
Clozapine 1972 (marketed) Overlaps with the benzazepine core First atypical antipsychotic
Olanzapine 1996 Similar scaffold Broader receptor profile
Quetiapine 1997 Benzazepine derivatives Improved side effect profile

Patent 4,105,776 laid groundwork for these drugs, though later patents have refined specific derivatives and formulations.


7. Future Outlook and Strategic Implications

  • Patent expiration suggests decreased barriers to generic manufacturing of benzazepine-based drugs.
  • Research focus continues on receptor selectivity, safety profiles, and targeted delivery.
  • Patent landscape complexity indicates opportunities for novel derivatives or combination therapies within the core benzazepine scaffold.

8. Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent broadly protects substituted benzazepine compounds with CNS activity, with claims covering chemical structures and synthesis methods.
  • Claims: Focus on chemical substitutions and utility as antipsychotics, establishing a wide, foundational intellectual property covering the benzazepine class.
  • Patent Landscape: Served as a critical patent during the development of notable antipsychotics like clozapine. Its expiration opened markets for generic benzazepine derivatives.
  • R&D Impact: The patent's broad claims fostered subsequent innovations but also led to complex patent thickets, requiring careful analysis for freedom-to-operate.
  • Current Status: Off-patent since 1995, with the landscape increasingly focusing on next-generation, receptor-specific agents.

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does Patent 4,105,776 influence current benzazepine-based drug development?
A: The patent established a broad chemical platform for benzazepines, enabling the development and patenting of subsequent derivatives and formulations, although it has now expired, removing patent barriers.

Q2: Are all benzazepine derivatives covered by this patent?
A: No, the patent covers a specific chemical class with particular substitution patterns. Derivatives outside the scope or with novel structures can still be patentable.

Q3: What are the implications of the patent's expiration for generic manufacturers?
A: Expiry permits generic companies to produce benzazepine-based antipsychotics without infringing on this patent, provided they do not infringe newer, narrower patents.

Q4: How does the patent landscape relate to subsequent drug approvals like olanzapine?
A: Olanzapine shares the benzazepine core and was developed after the patent's expiration, indicating that subsequent drugs built upon and diverged from the original chemical scaffold.

Q5: What strategy should companies consider when developing new benzazepine drugs post-expiration?
A: Focus on chemical modifications that confer improved efficacy, safety, receptor selectivity, or novel delivery methods to circumvent restrictions and achieve patentability.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,105,776, "Substituted Benzazepines," granted August 1, 1978.
  2. Johnson, C., et al., "The Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology of Benzazepines," Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1980.
  3. FDA Drug Approvals Database, 1970–2000.
  4. WIPO Patent Document WO 83/04572, "Benzazepine Derivatives," 1983.
  5. Patent landscape analysis reports from IAM Market Reports, 2022.

This detailed review facilitates strategic patent positioning, R&D planning, and competitive intelligence concerning benzazepine-based CNS therapeutics rooted in Patent 4,105,776.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,105,776

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,105,776

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 213102 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 213184 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 214649 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 214652 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 222445 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 222481 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.