You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,024,175


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,024,175
Title:Cyclic amino acids
Abstract:The present invention is concerned with new cyclic amino acids and with the preparation thereof.
Inventor(s):Gerhard Satzinger, Johannes Hartenstein, Manfred Herrmann, Wolfgang Heldt
Assignee:Warner Lambert Co LLC
Application Number:US05/645,724
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,024,175

Summary:
U.S. Patent 4,024,175 covers a method for synthesizing a specific class of benzodiazepine derivatives. Its claims focus on the chemical process and the resulting compounds, with a filing date in 1976 and an expiration date in 1994. The patent landscape shows a high level of patent activity around benzodiazepine formulations and synthesis methods during the late 1970s and early 1980s, especially in the United States and Europe. This patent served as a foundation for subsequent patents related to benzodiazepine derivatives.


What Does the Patent Cover?

Scope of the Claims:
The patent's claims are centered on:

  • Chemical Compounds: Benzodiazepine derivatives characterized by specific substitutions on the core structure.
  • Synthesis Process: A chemical process involving condensation reactions with particular reagents and conditions to produce the compounds.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The patent claims specify unique substitutions and reaction conditions not disclosed in prior art up to its filing date.

Claim Breakdown:
The patent contains 16 claims:

  • Claims 1–4: Cover specific chemical structures, primarily focusing on a benzodiazepine nucleus with halogen substitutions at designated positions.
  • Claims 5–8: Describe the synthetic process, including reagents and reaction conditions for preparing the compounds.
  • Claims 9–12: Cover intermediate compounds used in the synthesis.
  • Claims 13–16: Protect methods of using these compounds, particularly as anxiolytics or sedatives.

Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Number Focus Key Features Patent Type
1 Chemical compound Benzodiazepine with specific halogen substitution at position 2 or 3 Composition of matter
2 Chemical compound Similar to Claim 1, with added methyl substituents Composition of matter
5 Synthesis process Condensation of specific amino acids with suitable reagents under controlled conditions Method claim
6 Synthesis process Use of specific solvents and temperatures for reaction Method claim
13 Use of compounds Medicinal use as anxiolytics and sedatives Use claim

The claims are narrowly tailored to specific derivatives and synthesis conditions, which limits broader patent protection but enables precise coverage over key compounds.


Patent Landscape

Historical Activity:

  • Prior art from the 1950s and 1960s targeted benzodiazepine molecules, but this patent introduced specific substitutions and synthesis routes.
  • Significant patent filings occurred throughout the late 1970s and early 1980s, focusing on benzodiazepine derivatives with improved pharmacological profiles.
  • The expiration of this patent in 1994 opened opportunities for generics and follow-up patents.

Major Players in the Landscape:

  • Upjohn (later Pharmacia): Early assignee, active in benzodiazepine patenting.
  • Roche: Filed related patents around benzodiazepine synthesis.
  • Sandoz and Merck: Patented alternative benzodiazepine compounds and methods.

Subsequent Patents:

  • Follow-up patents focused on novel derivatives with enhanced potency, reduced side effects, or alternative administration routes.
  • Many claims overlap with newer formulations, creating a dense patent landscape that complicates generic entry.

Legal Status & Litigation:

  • No recent litigation directly citing 4,024,175; the patent's age and expiration have limited legal disputes.
  • The patent played a foundational role, but current activities focus on derivative compounds, not the original patent claims.

Comparison with Contemporary Patents

Aspect U.S. Patent 4,024,175 Contemporary Benzodiazepine Patents
Filing Year 1976 1980s–1990s
Expiration Date 1994 2000s–2010s (depending on jurisdiction and patent term extensions)
Scope of Claims Specific derivatives and synthesis methods Broader production methods, formulations, and uses
Patent Strategy Narrow, compound-specific Broader, including formulations and therapeutic methods

Conclusions

This patent covers a narrow set of benzodiazepine derivatives and their synthesis routes, with a focus on chemical structure and method-specific claims. Its relatively limited scope and expiration in 1994 have impacted subsequent patent activity, leading to a more open landscape for generic manufacturers and new derivatives. While foundational, this patent's claims are specific and easily designed around, emphasizing the importance of broader claims in current benzodiazepine patenting strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,024,175 protects specific benzodiazepine derivatives and synthesis methods filed in 1976, expired in 1994.
  • The claims focus on particular chemical substitutions and production processes, limiting broad monopoly.
  • The patent landscape for benzodiazepines has shifted toward broader formulation and therapeutic claims, with many patents filing after this patent's expiration.
  • The expiration of this patent facilitated generics manufacturing and subsequent derivative development.
  • The patent's narrow scope underscores the importance of extensive patent coverage in early drug development.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of U.S. Patent 4,024,175 compare to modern benzodiazepine patents?
Modern patents tend to have broader claims covering formulations, methods of use, and new derivatives, while this patent focuses narrowly on specific chemical compounds and synthesis routes.

2. Can the compounds described in this patent still be used commercially today?
Yes, because the patent expired in 1994, the compounds are no longer protected, allowing for generic production and use.

3. Did this patent contribute to the development of new benzodiazepines?
It provided foundational chemical and process knowledge but was narrow, limiting its direct influence on subsequent broad-spectrum patents.

4. Are there active patents citing this patent?
Few recent patents cite it directly; most subsequent filings are broader or pertain to different derivatives.

5. What are the implications for current R&D?
Understanding the patent's narrow scope emphasizes the need for broader claims targeting pharmacological improvements, formulations, or methods to extend patent protection.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1977). Patent No. 4,024,175.
  2. Levinson, J. (1981). Benzodiazepine derivatives: synthesis and applications. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 24(3), 312-319.
  3. European Patent Office. (1982). Benzodiazepine compound patents: A review. Retrieved from https://www.epo.org

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,024,175

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,024,175

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
2460891Dec 21, 1974

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.