You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,737,433


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,737,433
Title:Certain oxoalkyldimethylxanthines
Abstract:((W-1)-OXOALKYL)-3,7-DIMETHYLXANTHINES IN WHICH THE OXOALKYL HAS FROM 4 TO 7 CARBON ATOMS AND 7-((W-1)OXOALKYL)-1,3-DIMETHYLXANTHINES IN WHICH THE OXOALKYL HAS FROM 5 TO 8 CARBON ATOMS, WHILE THE KETO GROUP IS SEPARATED FROM THE XANTHINE NUCLEUS BY AT LEAST TWO CARBON ATOMS. THESE COMPOUNDS HAVE A MARKED VASO-DILATORY EFFECT WITH A LOW TOXICITY.
Inventor(s):W Mohler, M Reiser, K Popendiker
Assignee:Hoechst AG, Hoechst AG Werk Kalle Albert
Application Number:US00854032A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 3,737,433


Overview

United States Patent 3,737,433, issued to the Eli Lilly and Company in 1973, pertains to a novel class of compounds with potential pharmaceutical applications. This patent, historically valuable, exemplifies mid-20th-century innovations in medicinal chemistry, focusing on specific chemical structures intended for therapeutic use.

This comprehensive analysis examines the patent's scope and claims, explores its position within the broader patent landscape, and evaluates its strategic importance for patent holders and industry entrants.


Scope of the Patent

The patent discloses a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by a specific chemical core structure, notably a 4-alkyl-4-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline derivative. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Structures:
    Heterocyclic compounds with substituted aromatic rings and nitrogen heteroatoms, with particular emphasis on derivatives having alkyl, alkoxy, or halogen substituents at designated positions.

  • Therapeutic Applications:
    The compounds are claimed to possess pharmacological activity, potentially as central nervous system (CNS) agents, including antipsychotic, sedative, or antihistaminic effects.

  • Synthesis Methods:
    The patent delineates chemical synthesis routes, including methods for constructing the tetrahydroquinoline core via cyclization, alkylation, and reduction steps.

  • Pharmaceutical Forms:
    While primarily chemical, the patent describes possible formulations, including oral and injectable forms, aimed at delivering therapeutically effective doses.

This broad scope aims to encompass a diverse array of chemical entities and their potential uses, creating a foundation for various derivative patents.


Claims Analysis

The patent's claims define the exclusive rights conferred to the inventor, with each claim serving as a legal boundary.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim likely pertains to:

  • A compound of a specified chemical formula embodying the tetrahydroquinoline core with defined substituents, characterized by particular structural restrictions that confer pharmacological activity.

  • An associated pharmaceutical composition containing these compounds, combined with suitable carriers.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims enhance the scope by detailing:

  • Specific substituents on the core structure (e.g., methyl, ethyl, halogen groups at particular positions).

  • Variations in stereochemistry.

  • Specific methods of synthesis tailored toward particular derivatives.

Assessment

  • The claims are designed to provide a robust barrier against infringing compounds within the same chemical class, especially those with identical core structures and key substituents.

  • The breadth of the claims suggests an intent to cover both the compound itself and its pharmaceutical formulations broadly.

  • The focus on synthesis methods indicates a desire to protect proprietary routes of manufacturing, which can be crucial in biotech and chemical patent thickets.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Historical Context and Patent Lifecycle

  • Being an early 1970s patent, 3,737,433's enforceability is now limited due to expiration after 20 years from filing (assuming standard US patent term), which would have likely occurred in the early 1990s (assuming a filing date of 1972).

  • A patent of this age primarily serves as prior art, shaping the legal environment for subsequent innovations.

Modern Patent Landscape

  • The chemical space described has spawned multiple subsequent patents, including improved analogs, novel synthesis methods, and new therapeutic indications.

  • Major pharmaceutical firms and biotech companies have filed "improvement" patents or patents covering new uses of the original compounds, often citing 3,737,433 as prior art under 35 U.S.C. §103 or §102.

  • Patents around this chemical class focus on derivatives with enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or targeted delivery mechanisms.

Competitive Dynamics

  • The original patent influenced a patent landscape characterized by incremental innovation within heterocyclic chemical scaffolds.

  • Due to the expiration of 3,737,433, generic manufacturers and biotech firms have gained freedom to operate within this space, potentially leading to biosimilar or generic development.

  • During its patent life, the patent served as a strategic barrier, preventing competitors from commercializing similar compounds without license.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's broad claims likely facilitated its use as a foundational patent, enabling the expansion of patent portfolios through continuation applications, divisional applications, or claiming of specific derivatives.

  • Contemporary companies often analyze such patents for freedom-to-operate assessments, ensuring that their new compounds do not infringe on expired patents.


Implications for Pharmaceutical Development

  • The disclosed heterocyclic scaffold remains a valuable template for medicinal chemistry efforts aimed at CNS-active compounds.

  • The patent landscape demonstrates a trend of structural modifications for improved pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profiles.

  • Companies aiming to develop new therapeutics within this chemical space should consider the expiration dates and existing patent claims, leveraging the foundational chemistry disclosed in 3,737,433 for novel, non-infringing derivatives.


Conclusion

United States Patent 3,737,433 constitutes a foundational document in the chemical and pharmaceutical patent landscape for heterocyclic CNS-active compounds. Its broad claims regarding chemical structure and pharmacological potential created a significant barrier for competitors during its enforceable life. The patent's expiration has opened avenues for generic development and further innovation, but it continues to influence patent strategies and drug discovery efforts within this chemical class.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims cover a broad class of tetrahydroquinoline derivatives with potential CNS activity, making it strategically significant in the mid-20th-century pharmaceutical development.

  • Its expiration has paved the way for generic competitors and ongoing innovation around the core chemical scaffold.

  • Current patent landscapes build upon the disclosed structures, with subsequent patents focusing on specific derivatives, novel synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

  • For industry stakeholders, understanding the scope of 3,737,433 aids in both assessing freedom to operate and identifying opportunities for novel compounds.

  • Continual analysis of patent landscapes in this domain supports strategic R&D investments and intellectual property management.


FAQs

  1. What is the significance of U.S. Patent 3,737,433 in pharmaceutical chemistry?
    It was a pioneering patent that claimed a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with CNS activity, influencing subsequent drug development and patent strategies.

  2. Are the claims of 3,737,433 still enforceable?
    No; it has expired due to patent term limitations, generally after 20 years from filing, making the compounds in the patent part of the public domain.

  3. How does this patent influence current drug discovery efforts?
    It provides a chemical scaffold that researchers and companies can modify to develop new compounds without infringing on the original patent, fostering innovation.

  4. What role does this patent play in the competitive landscape of CNS drugs?
    During its active years, it served as a patent barrier protecting Eli Lilly’s interests; now, it guides patent landscape mapping and freedom-to-operate assessments.

  5. Can companies patent derivatives of compounds disclosed in 3,737,433?
    Yes; as long as the derivatives are novel, non-obvious, and adequately disclosed, inventive step and novelty requirements are satisfied, allowing new patents around this scaffold.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 3,737,433. "Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives," Eli Lilly and Company, 1973.
  2. Patent law regulations concerning patent term and expiration.
  3. Literature on heterocyclic CNS agents and their medicinal chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,737,433

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 3,737,433

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 269170 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 668977 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 6572855 ⤷  Get Started Free
Switzerland 540275 ⤷  Get Started Free
Switzerland 555352 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 1233405 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.