Share This Page
Details for Patent: 3,674,870
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 3,674,870
| Title: | Phenyl benzoic acid compounds in compositions and methods for treating inflammation |
| Abstract: | The invention relates to a method of treating inflammation by administering substituted 5-(phenyl) benzoic acids, esters and non-toxic pharmaceutically accepted salts thereof to patients. |
| Inventor(s): | William V Ruyle, Lewis H Sarett, Alexander R Matzuk |
| Assignee: | Merck and Co Inc |
| Application Number: | US44868A |
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; Compound; |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 3,674,870 IntroductionUnited States Patent 3,674,870 pertains to a pioneering patent issued in 1972, recognized for its historical significance in pharmaceutical and biochemical innovations. As a cornerstone patent, it has influenced subsequent developments within its domain, shaping the patent landscape surrounding its technological field. A meticulous analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment reveals insights crucial for industry stakeholders, including patent examiners, legal strategists, and R&D executives. Overview of U.S. Patent 3,674,870Patent Details
The patent primarily discloses a novel and improved method to produce crystalline forms of vitamin B12, specifically cyanocobalamin and related derivatives, emphasizing purity, stability, and process efficiency. Scope of the PatentTechnological Focus The patent’s scope encompasses both the chemical processes for synthesizing crystalline vitamin B12 and the resulting crystalline forms with specified physical characteristics essential for pharmaceutical and nutritional applications. It centers on a process that enhances purity, yield, and stability, marking a significant enhancement over prior art. Key Aspects of the Scope
Patent Claims and Their Breadth The claims can be segmented into two categories:
Claim 1 exemplifies the scope—premising a method involving dissolving vitamin B12 compounds in a specific solvent, inducing crystallization under controlled conditions. Analysis of ClaimsClaim Structure and Language The claims are written with precise language typical for chemical patents, establishing method limitations and physical characteristics of the final product.
Scope and Limitations The patent’s claims are relatively broad for their time, covering:
However, the scope excludes alternative synthetic routes or forms not conforming to the specific parameters disclosed. Potential for Design Around Due to the detailed process steps and specific physical characteristics, competitors could potentially develop alternative methods or crystalline forms outside the defined parameters, focusing on different solvents, reaction conditions, or polymorphic forms. Nonetheless, the combination of process and product claims provides robust protection within the disclosed scope. Patent Landscape AnalysisPre-Patent Art and State of the Art Before 1972 Prior to the grant of this patent, vitamin B12 production primarily relied on fermentation and extraction processes, with crystalline forms available but not optimized for stability or purity. The patent represented an incremental yet significant leap by refining crystallization techniques, thereby improving manufacturability and product quality. Post-Patent Innovations Subsequent innovations increasingly focused on:
Legal and Competitive Landscape
Key Competitor and Litigation Activity
Implication for Present-Day StakeholdersUnderstanding the patent’s scope helps:
ConclusionU.S. Patent 3,674,870 established foundational process and product claims concerning crystalline vitamin B12, emphasizing process control and crystalline form characterization. Its claims are broad yet detailed enough to cover key manufacturing methods and crystalline specifications. Although expired, its influence persists, informing both patent design and technological strategies in vitamin B12 synthesis. Key Takeaways
FAQs1. What is the main innovation introduced by U.S. Patent 3,674,870? 2. Does this patent cover all methods of producing crystalline vitamin B12? 3. Has this patent been cited in later patents? 4. Is the process outlined in this patent still relevant today? 5. Can the crystalline forms covered by this patent be legally used today? References[1] U.S. Patent 3,674,870. More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,674,870
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
