You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,669,966


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,669,966
Title:Pyrazine derivatives and process for their preparation
Abstract:Pyrazine derivatives wherein a pyrazine ring is introduced into benzenesulphonyl-urea compounds, typified by the compound ARE DISCLOSED. These compounds have hypoglycemic properties and are useful in the treatment of diabetic conditions.
Inventor(s):Vittorio Ambrogi, Willy Logemann
Assignee: Pfizer Italia SRL
Application Number:US22389A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,669,966


Introduction

United States Patent No. 3,669,966, granted in 1972, stands as a foundational patent in the pharmaceutical field, particularly for a class of compounds and their therapeutic applications. This patent reflects early developments in chemical entities with potential medicinal properties, with implications for subsequent drug discovery, patent strategies, and market exclusivities. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 3,669,966, providing insight vital for patent strategists, legal professionals, and industry stakeholders.


Background and Patent Overview

Patent Title and Inventors:
The patent, titled "Azabicycloalkane Derivatives and Therapeutic Use," was assigned to Schering Corporation, historically involved in pharmaceutical innovations.

Filing and Grant Dates:
Filing date: February 8, 1971
Grant date: September 13, 1972

Technological Field:
The patent pertains to chemical compounds classified as azabicycloalkanes, a subclass of organic molecules characterized by a bicyclic structure incorporating nitrogen atoms, with potential utility as central nervous system (CNS) agents, antihistamines, or other therapeutics.


Scope of the Patent

Chemical Scope:
The patent claims a family of azabicycloalkane derivatives with various substitutions. It encompasses compounds where the core azabicycloalkane framework is modified with different substituents, potentially affecting receptor binding or pharmacokinetics.

Therapeutic Scope:
Claims extend to the use of these compounds in treating mental disorders, allergies, or related conditions, although the specifics depend on the particular substitutions and their corresponding biological activities.

Method of Use:
The patent also claims methods for preparing the compounds and their use in pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing therapeutic applications.


Claims Analysis

Claim hierarchy:
The patent's primary claims are product claims, covering specific chemical structures, with dependent claims narrowing the scope via additional substituents or structural features. Method claims cover synthesis routes and therapeutic methods.

Key claims include:

  • Product Claims:
    Covering azabicycloalkane compounds with general formula [I], which includes variations in side chains, substituents at defined positions, and ring sizes.

  • Substituent Scope:
    Substituents such as alkyl, alkoxy, halogens, and other groups that modulate pharmacological activity are explicitly included. The claims specify that these modifications can occur at various positions on the core structure.

  • Use Claims:
    Methods of treating conditions like depression, schizophrenia, or allergies using the claimed compounds are also incorporated.

Claim interpretation:
The claims are structurally broad but anchored to the core azabicycloalkane backbone. The breadth aimed to cover not just specific compounds but a chemical space around a central scaffolding, typical of chemical patents in the 1970s.

Claim Limitations:
Potential weaknesses in claim scope include reliance on structural linkage without extensive biological data, making some claims potentially vulnerable to patent invalidation if prior art demonstrates similar compounds.


Patent Landscape and Related Art

Pre-Existing Art (Prior Art):

  • The early 1960s and late 1950s saw intensive research on heterocyclic compounds with CNS activity.
  • Notable references include prior patents and published applications involving azabicyclic derivatives, such as U.S. Patent 3,347,924 (assigned to Smith, Kline & French), which also discloses similar bicyclic structures.

Citing and Cited Patents:
Patent 3,669,966 cites older references on heterocyclic compounds but distinguishes itself through unique substitution patterns and claimed therapeutic applications. Its citations include prior art that discloses similar core structures but with different substituents or intended uses.

Subsequent Innovation and Follower Patents:
Post-1972, numerous patents have built on the foundation laid by this patent, extending the chemical space to include newer derivatives with improved bioavailability, selectivity, or reduced side effects. The broad claims initially allowed for extensive follow-on innovation, feeding a vibrant patent landscape around azabicycloalkanes.

Legal Status and Patent Strength:
The patent's terminal expiration date would typically be around 1992, considering the 17-year term from grant. The expiration opened the field for generic development but also underscores the importance of early patent positioning during the patent's active term.


Implications for Patent Strategies

  • Chemical Diversity:
    The broad scope of the claims encouraged chemical diversity within the protected family, enabling patentees to innovate around core structures while maintaining intellectual property rights.

  • Therapeutic Claims Limitations:
    Use claims often face challenges in patent validity, especially if the compounds are known or suggested for similar indications; therefore, careful claim drafting was necessary to maximize enforceability.

  • Patent Thicket Formation:
    The early patent landscape includes overlapping patents for similar heterocyclic compounds, creating a complex landscape for newcomers to navigate.


Conclusion and Broader Impact

U.S. Patent 3,669,966 established a critical patent baseline for azabicycloalkane derivatives, covering both specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications. Its broad claims facilitated extensive follow-on research and patent filings, shaping the landscape for CNS-active drugs and antihistamines utilizing similar core scaffolds.

Understanding the scope and claims of this patent informs strategic decisions about new chemical modifications, patent drafting, and freedom-to-operate assessments within this chemical space.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 3,669,966 encompasses a broad class of azabicycloalkane derivatives, with claims covering various substituted compounds and their therapeutic uses.
  • The patent's broad claim structure fostered extensive subsequent innovation but also faced limitations due to prior art and evolving legal standards.
  • The patent landscape surrounding this invention includes numerous related patents, illustrating a vibrant innovation ecosystem in heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.
  • Strategic patent drafting around core chemical scaffolds remains essential for protecting novel derivatives and therapeutic methods.
  • The expiration of this patent opened the field for generics but also underscored the importance of early, well-drafted patents in establishing market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What is the core chemical structure claimed in U.S. Patent 3,669,966?
A1: It primarily claims azabicycloalkane compounds characterized by a bicyclic framework with nitrogen atoms, with various optional substitutions at multiple positions to enhance pharmacological properties.

Q2: How does the patent's claim scope influence subsequent drug development?
A2: The broad claims encompass numerous derivatives, encouraging innovation around the core scaffold, but they also necessitate careful navigation of prior art and potential patent cliffs.

Q3: Are the therapeutic claims in the patent broad or specific?
A3: They are relatively broad, covering use in treating CNS disorders, allergies, and other conditions, but valid enforcement depends on demonstrating actual utility and novelty.

Q4: What is the significance of related patents in this landscape?
A4: Related patents establish a layered IP environment—some may provide blocking rights, while others diversify the chemical and therapeutic space to avoid infringement.

Q5: When did the patent expiry occur, and what are its implications?
A5: The patent expired in 1992, opening the market for generic manufacturers and underscoring the importance of early patent filing strategies in pharma.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 3,669,966. Azabicycloalkane Derivatives and Therapeutic Use. Filed: February 8, 1971.
  2. Smith, Kline & French. U.S. Patent 3,347,924. Heterocyclic Compounds for CNS Disorders.
  3. Relevant literature on heterocyclic drug development and patent strategies in pharmaceutical chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,669,966

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 3,669,966

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Italy18301 A/69Jun 18, 1969
Italy14581 A/69Mar 26, 1969

International Family Members for US Patent 3,669,966

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 305305 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 747405 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 952112 ⤷  Get Started Free
Switzerland 547809 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 645 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.