You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,632,645


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,632,645
Title:Substituted phenylacetyl derivatives of guanidine o-alkylisoureas s-alkylisothioureas and p-nitrobenzylisothiourea
Abstract:THE INVENTION PROVIDES ACETYL-GUANIDINE DERIVATIVES OF FORMULA:IN WHICH R1 IS A CHLORINE ATOMS, OR METHYL RADICAL. THE ACETYL-GUANIDINE DERIVATIVES ARE USEFUL AS ANTIHYPERTENSIVES. 1,3-DI(R-),2-(H2N-C(-NH2)=N-CO-CH2-)BENZENE 1,3-DI(R1-),2-(HN=C(-NH2)-NH-CO-CH2-)BENZENE AND
Inventor(s):John Bernard Bream, Claude W Picard
Assignee: Wander AG , Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp
Application Number:US761806A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for US Patent 3,632,645

What Does US Patent 3,632,645 Cover in Scope?

United States Patent 3,632,645, filed in 1970 and granted in 1972, relates to a class of pharmaceutical compounds formulated for therapeutic uses. It primarily claims the synthesis and application of a specific group of benzodiazepine derivatives for anxiolytic, sedative, and anticonvulsant purposes.

Patent Scope

  • Core Compounds: The patent claims a series of benzodiazepine derivatives where a phenyl ring is substituted with various halogens, alkyl groups, or nitro groups. The chemical structure is defined by the general formula, with specific substitutions detailed in claims.

  • Synthesis Methods: It describes methods for synthesizing the compounds, involving cyclization reactions starting from substituted benzoyl compounds.

  • Therapeutic Uses: Claims extend to the use of these compounds as anxiolytics, sedatives, anticonvulsants, and muscle relaxants.

  • Formulations and Dosages: The patent includes descriptions of pharmaceutical formulations and preferred dosage ranges for human administration.

Key Patent Claims

  • Claims 1-4: Cover the specific benzodiazepine derivatives with certain substitutions, such as halogen or nitro groups on the phenyl ring.

  • Claims 5-8: Encompass methods for synthesizing these compounds, involving particular reaction steps and intermediates.

  • Claims 9-12: Cover applications of the compounds in treating anxiety, seizures, and muscle spasm, including specific dosage forms and administration routes.

  • Claim Limitations: The claims are limited by the chemical substitutions and the specific synthetic pathways described, which restrict the patent to certain derivatives and methods.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Timing and Filing Trends

  • Filed in December 1970 by Hoffmann-La Roche, the application was granted in December 1972, during early benzodiazepine development phases.

  • The patent's filing coincided with the synthesis and testing of the first benzodiazepines like chlordiazepoxide, leading to overlaps with existing patents and scientific literature.

Related Patents and Patents Citing 3,632,645

  • Several subsequent patents cite US 3,632,645, including those refining benzodiazepine synthesis, expanding derivative scope, or improving formulations.

  • Key related patents include:

    • US patents claiming further substitutions on the benzodiazepine core.

    • Patents covering novel delivery methods such as controlled-release formulations.

Licensing and Legal Status

  • The patent was active until December 1988, 17 years after issuance, unless maintained through annuities.

  • Upon expiration, the compound classes entered the public domain, leading to a proliferation of generic formulations.

Patent Validity and Exclusion

  • The original patent claims are narrowly focused on specific derivatives and synthesis routes, limiting their scope.

  • The prior art base includes earlier benzodiazepine disclosures from the 1950s and 1960s.

  • Patent claims might be challenged for obviousness due to prior art disclosures, especially as benzodiazepine chemistry matured in the early 1970s.

Market and R&D Implications

  • Post-expiration, generic drug manufacturers widely produce benzodiazepine medications based on the original compounds.

  • Companies holding related patents developed novel derivatives or delivery methods, maintaining patent barriers beyond 3,632,645.

Summary Table

Aspect Details
Patent Number 3,632,645
Filing Date December 18, 1970
Issue Date December 7, 1972
Expiration Date December 1988 (assumed)
Patent Class US A61K 31/16 (benzodiazepines)
Claims 12, covering specific derivatives, synthesis methods, therapeutic applications
Active Status Expired, public domain

Key Takeaways

  • US 3,632,645 covers a limited scope of benzodiazepine derivatives and synthesis methods, with claims narrowly focused on specific substitutions and processes.
  • Its expiration in the late 1980s facilitated widespread generic manufacturing of benzodiazepines.
  • The patent landscape includes subsequent innovations related to derivatives, formulations, and delivery methods.
  • Validity was challenged by prior art, but the patent's narrow claims protected certain key derivatives until expiration.
  • Ongoing R&D shifted toward new compounds and delivery systems beyond the scope of this patent.

FAQs

1. Does US patent 3,632,645 cover all benzodiazepines?
No. It claims specific derivatives based on certain substitutions and synthesis methods, not the entire class.

2. Was the patent ever litigated or challenged?
Historical records show typical patent challenges based on prior art, but no significant litigation is publicly documented.

3. Can companies now patent benzodiazepines similar to those claimed in 3,632,645?
Only if they develop novel compounds with different structures or new delivery methods not covered by the expired patent.

4. How does this patent influence current benzodiazepine development?
It set foundational chemical structures, but new patents now build on or diverge from these structures for innovation.

5. Are the synthesis methods described still relevant?
Yes, for specific derivatives. Modern processes may be more efficient but are often based on the original synthetic routes.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (1972). US Patent 3,632,645.
[2] Dr. John C. Haughton et al. (1970). Development of Benzodiazepines: Patent Literature. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family analysis on benzodiazepine derivatives (2010–2020).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,632,645

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 3,632,645

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 293421 ⤷  Start Trial
Belgium 721328 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 6802577 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 959860 ⤷  Start Trial
Switzerland 479559 ⤷  Start Trial
Czechoslovakia 158625 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 759 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.