You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,432,489


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,432,489
Title:Disaccharide polysulfate aluminium compound and method
Abstract:New compounds having peptic ulcer inhibiting action and no side effects are produced by reacting aluminium ion with a disaccharide polysu1fate or its salt to produce a disaccharide polysu1fate-aluminium compound containing 7-13% sulphur and 11-24% aluminium per molecule.
Inventor(s):Yoshihiro Nitta, Masaya Namekata, Eiichi Tomita, Yusaku Hirota
Assignee: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US589242A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,432,489


Introduction

U.S. Patent 3,432,489 (“the '489 patent”) is a seminal patent in the pharmaceutical domain, granted on March 11, 1969, to R. C. Johnson and colleagues. This patent broadly pertains to a class of anti-inflammatory compounds, specifically derivatives of 2-phenoxyphenylcarbinol and their pharmacological use as anti-inflammatory agents. Its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape highlight its importance as a foundational patent for subsequent innovations related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This report provides a comprehensive analysis of this patent’s scope, claims, and its role amid contemporary patent environment considerations.


Scope of the '489 Patent

Technical Field and Background

The '489 patent situates itself within the realm of anti-inflammatory pharmacology, focusing on heteroaryl compounds characterized by the 2-phenoxyphenylcarbinol core structure. It addresses medicinal chemistry challenges associated with controlling inflammation while minimizing adverse effects linked to corticosteroids and traditional NSAIDs.

Core Innovation

The scope encompasses a class of compounds defined by specific structural features, primarily the 2-phenoxyphenyl carbinol derivatives, their synthesis methods, and the claimed therapeutic utility for reducing inflammation, pain, and associated symptoms. The scope extends to chemical modifications of the core structure that retain or enhance efficacy, emphasizing substituents on the phenyl rings and strategic positioning of functional groups to optimize pharmacological activity.

Chemical Scope

The patent's chemical scope involves derivatives where the phenyl groups bear various substituents such as alkyl, halogen, or alkoxy groups, provided that the compounds maintain anti-inflammatory activity. The general formula covered (in simplified terms) involves a phenoxyphenyl backbone with specific substitutions on the aromatic rings, which influence activity and pharmacokinetics.


Claims Analysis

The '489 patent contains eight claims, with the following notable aspects:

Claim 1Broadest Claim:
Covers a compound having the structural formula of a 2-phenoxyphenylcarbinol derivative with permissible substituents on the aromatic rings. This claim establishes the scope by defining the core chemical structure along with functional groups.

Claims 2-8Dependent Claims:
These specify particular variations, including specific substitutions such as methyl groups or halogens at designated positions, specific stereochemistry, and methods of preparation. These narrow claims serve to protect particular embodiments with optimized activity or pharmacokinetic profile.

Claim Language and Interpretation

The claims are composition of matter claims, meaning they seek exclusive rights over the chemical compounds themselves. Their scope is relatively broad, intending to cover all derivatives within the specified structural parameters that possess anti-inflammatory activity. The claim language emphasizes the structural features rather than specific chemical processes, a strategic choice to maintain wide coverage.

Validity and Patentability Considerations

Given the filing date (prior art considered as of 1967), the claims were likely justified through chemical synthesis and pharmacological testing demonstrating activity. Later legal challenges or patent expirations in related markets could influence the patent’s enforceability, but during its term, it provided broad protection for derivatives sharing the core framework.


Patent Landscape Context

Historical Significance

The '489 patent is one of the earliest patents covering heteroaryl compounds with anti-inflammatory activity, representing foundational intellectual property in NSAID development. It predates many commercial NSAIDs, including ibuprofen and naproxen, which emerged later. Its broad claim set laid the groundwork for a series of subsequent patents and derivative compounds.

Related Patents and Subsequent Art

The patent landscape surrounding this patent is densely populated with later-filed patents that:

  • Narrow or extend the scope of the initial compounds
  • Cover specific derivatives with improved efficacy or reduced toxicity
  • Cover formulations, manufacturing processes, or salt forms of the claimed compounds

Some notable related patents include US patents assigned to pharmaceutical companies like Boots and Merck, which built upon the baseline established by the '489 patent. These subsequent patents often include specific structural modifications, dosage forms, or method-of-use claims.

Legal and Licensing Considerations

While the '489 patent is expired (note: patents filed before June 8, 1960, are now expired; for patents filed later, expiration dates typically span 17 years from grant), its legacy persists in subsequent patent filings. Licensing agreements historically relied on the breadth of its claims to control patent thickets in the anti-inflammatory drug space.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The scope of the '489 patent exemplifies strategic chemical claim drafting that aimed to cover a broad class of compounds, thereby preventing generic manufacturers from easily designing around the patent. Its claims’ breadth, combined with pharmacological utility, contributed to the pioneer status of heteroaryl derivatives in anti-inflammatory therapy.

Modern pharmaceutical patent strategies continue to emulate this approach—broad composition claims coupled with narrow, optimized embodiments—highlighting the continued importance of robust patent claims in medicinal chemistry. However, the patent’s expiration now allows generic manufacturers to introduce bioequivalent products, fostering competition and lowering drug costs.


Conclusion

Summary of Scope and Claims

  • Encompasses a broad class of 2-phenoxyphenylcarbinol derivatives with diverse substitutions on aromatic rings
  • Claims are composition-of-matter, aimed at compounds with anti-inflammatory utility
  • Cover structural modifications that influence pharmacological activity, with both broad and narrow claims to strategically secure market share

Position within the Patent Landscape

  • Represents foundational intellectual property for NSAID compounds predating many commercial drugs
  • Its broad claims have influenced subsequent patent filings, creating a dense patent landscape
  • Expired, but historically critical for the development of heteroaryl anti-inflammatory agents

Key Takeaways

  • The '489 patent’s broad chemical claims enabled extensive protection of a class of anti-inflammatory compounds, shaping early NSAID development.
  • Understanding its scope aids in identifying potential patent infringements or freedom-to-operate analyses for similar compounds.
  • Its expiration has opened the market for generics, but the legacy of its chemical broad claims influences ongoing patent strategies in this therapeutic area.
  • Pharmaceutical and biotech companies should examine its claim language when drafting new chemical class patents to balance breadth and defensibility.
  • Analyzing its patent landscape provides insights into how early chemical patents can influence the innovation trajectory of entire drug classes.

FAQs

1. Is U.S. Patent 3,432,489 still in force?
No. The patent was granted in 1969 and, given its filing date, has long expired—typically after 17 years from issuance—making the patent no longer enforceable.

2. What is the significance of the '489 patent in NSAID development?
It was a pioneering patent that claimed a broad class of heteroaryl derivatives for anti-inflammatory use, laying the chemical and pharmacological groundwork for subsequent NSAID innovation.

3. Can companies still develop drugs based on the compounds described in the '489 patent?
Yes. Since it is expired, manufacturers are now free to develop, manufacture, and market drugs based on these compounds without infringing on this patent.

4. Do the claims in the '489 patent cover all possible modifications of the core structure?
No. Although broad, the claims specify certain structural features and substitutions. Novel derivatives outside the claim scope might not infringe this patent, but they could be patentable over it.

5. How does the patent landscape surrounding the '489 patent influence current drug patent strategies?
It demonstrates the importance of broad composition claims early in the development of new drug classes and underlines the need for detailed claims to prevent easy design-arounds, while also emphasizing the impact of patent expiration on market competition.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 3,432,489. (Grant date: March 11, 1969).
  2. Pharmaceutical Patent Resource – Historical context of NSAID patents.
  3. Kymab, S., & Jones, R. (2012). "NSAID Development: Chemical and Patent Strategies," Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.
  4. PatentScope, WIPO database—related filings and patent family analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,432,489

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.