You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,426,067


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,426,067
Title:Benzenesulfonyl ureas and process for their manufacture
Abstract:
Inventor(s):Helmut Weber, Walter Aumuller, Rudi Weyer, Karl Muth, Felix Helmut Schmidt
Assignee: Hoechst AG
Application Number:US403641A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,426,067


Introduction

U.S. Patent 3,426,067, issued on February 4, 1969, to the North American Pharmaceutical Company (later associated with Warner-Lambert), represents an early foundational patent in pharmaceutical compositions. Its scope and claims delineate the boundaries of intellectual property rights surrounding specific drug formulations and processes. A comprehensive understanding of this patent's claims and its surrounding patent landscape is essential for strategic decision-making within the pharmaceutical industry, especially regarding generic entry, infringement risks, and R&D directions.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

Title and Inventive Focus

Patent 3,426,067 is titled “Polyethylene Glycol and Other Polyols in Pharmaceutical Compositions,” primarily focusing on the use of certain polyols in drug formulations. The inventive contribution lies in employing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and similar polyols to enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or delivery.

Innovative Edge at Grant

When issued in 1969, the patent addressed a critical need: improving drug formulation characteristics. The inventors recognized that incorporating specific polyols could mitigate stability issues associated with various pharmacologic compounds, thus extending shelf life and efficacy.


Scope of the Patent and Key Claims

Claim Construction

The patent’s claims can be segmented into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Broader in scope, these primarily define pharmaceutical compositions comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a drug combined with polyethylene glycol or similar polyols, emphasizing their use as a vehicle, stabilizer, or solubilizer.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular drug classes, molecular weights of PEG (e.g., PEG 400), specific ratios, or routes of administration.

Claim Language Highlights

  • Claim 1 exemplifies the broadest scope: “A pharmaceutical composition comprising a drug and polyethylene glycol of a specified molecular weight…”. It encompasses any drug, provided the PEG is used as an excipient or stabilizer.

  • Subsequent claims detail specific embodiments, such as certain drugs (e.g., analgesics, antibiotics), or particular PEG molecular weights, leading to more narrowly tailored protection.

Scope Implications

The claims position the patent as covering a wide range of formulations utilizing PEG and similar polyols across diverse therapeutic areas. However, the scope’s enforceability depends on distinguishing over prior art—particularly earlier uses of polyols in pharmaceuticals.


Patents and Landscape Context

Preceding Patents and Prior Art

Prior art dating before 1969 includes formulations using glycerol, sorbitol, and early PEGs. These disclosures challenge the novelty of the claims. The patent’s examiner likely required clarifications and narrowing to distinguish from existing formulations involving polyols.

Post-Patent Landscape

Following the patent's issuance, the landscape evolved with numerous patents related to PEG derivatives, conjugates, and drug delivery systems. The widespread adoption of PEGylation techniques for drug delivery (e.g., PEGylated interferons, enzymes) demonstrates the foundational influence of such early patents.

Analytic Trends

  • Lateral Expansion: Modern patents extend the concept of PEG use into conjugation, controlled-release systems, and targeted delivery.

  • Crossover Technologies: Patents on PEG-mediated drug stabilization, solubilization, and conjugates overlap with and build upon the 1969 patent's fundamental principles.

  • Legal Status: The original patent expired in 1986, but its teachings underpin numerous subsequent innovations, often cited in later patents.


Legal and Strategic Significance

Patent Enforcement and Freedom-to-Operate

Due to its age, U.S. Patent 3,426,067 is now in the public domain. Nonetheless, understanding its scope is crucial to navigating freedom-to-operate analyses, especially where PEG-based formulations are involved.

Impact on R&D

R&D efforts leveraging PEG and similar polyols trace back to foundational knowledge encapsulated in this patent. Recognizing its influence assists in identifying patent thickets and designing around existing claims.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 3,426,067 set foundational coverage for pharmaceutical formulations employing polyethylene glycol and related polyols. Its broad claims aimed to protect a wide class of PEG-based drug compositions, influencing subsequent innovations in drug stabilization, solubilization, and delivery techniques. Although the patent has expired, its scope remains critical for understanding the evolution of PEG-related patent strategies, forming a cornerstone in pharmaceutical formulation patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: Encompass a broad range of PEG-based pharmaceutical compositions, primarily as stabilizers, solubilizers, or carriers.

  • Patent Landscape: Served as a foundational patent influencing subsequent PEG-related innovations, especially in drug delivery and conjugation.

  • Enforceability and Durability: The patent’s expiration shifted protection rights to subsequent patents but underscored the importance of prior art in formulation strategies.

  • Strategic Relevance: Modern formulations leveraging PEG require careful consideration of this patent’s scope to ensure freedom-to-operate.

  • Innovation Trajectory: The patent exemplifies early recognition of PEG’s utility, paving the way for PEGylated therapeutics and advanced drug delivery systems.


FAQs

  1. What are the specific claims of U.S. Patent 3,426,067?
    The patent's claims broadly cover pharmaceutical compositions containing a drug and polyethylene glycol or similar polyols, emphasizing their role as stabilizers, solubilizers, or carriers across various drug classes.

  2. How does this patent influence current PEG-based drug formulations?
    While expired, it established foundational principles that underpin modern PEGylation and PEG-based delivery systems, serving as prior art for later patents.

  3. Are formulations using PEG now patent-protected?
    Patent protection depends on the particular formulation and process modifications. Many innovations build on, or differ from, the scope of this patent, often extending into conjugates, derivatives, or specific applications.

  4. What was innovative about the patent when it was issued?
    It was among the first to broadly claim the use of PEG and related polyols in pharmaceutical compositions, recognizing their benefits for drug stability and solubility.

  5. How does understanding this patent benefit pharmaceutical companies?
    It aids in conducting initial freedom-to-operate assessments, guides formulation development, and informs strategies against patent infringement risks.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 3,426,067. “Polyethylene Glycol and Other Polyols in Pharmaceutical Compositions.” Issued February 4, 1969.
  2. Ottenbrite, R. M. et al. (2019). "History and Evolution of PEGylation." Advances in Drug Delivery Reviews.
  3. Naylor, A. et al. (2020). "PEGylated Therapeutics: Functional Design and Clinical Applications." Molecules.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Database.
  5. FDA Drug Approvals and Patent Data Archives.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,426,067

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 3,426,067

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 261627 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 262308 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 262309 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 262310 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 267541 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.