You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,295,989


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,295,989
Title:Controlled-release PTH compound
Abstract:The invention provides a method of treating or controlling hypoparathyroidism in a human patient by administering to the human patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising a controlled-release PTH compound or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The controlled-release PTH compound comprises a PTH moiety reversibly conjugated to a branched polyethylene glycol carrier. The composition is administered by subcutaneous injection no more frequently than once every 24 hours with a dosage of the controlled-release PTH compound that corresponds to no more than 70% of the molar equivalent dose of PTH 1-84 administered by subcutaneous injection at the same dosing frequency required to maintain a serum albumin-adjusted calcium level in serum of above 8.5 mg/dL over a 24 hour period.
Inventor(s):Kennett Sprogøe, Guillaume Maitro, Mathias Krusch, Thomas Wegge, Joachim Zettler, Lars Holten-Andersen, David Brian Karpf
Assignee: Ascendis Pharma Bone Diseases AS
Application Number:US18/421,786
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 12,295,989


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 12,295,989, issued on August 2, 2022, represents a critical intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. The patent pertains to a novel formulation or method associated with a specific drug compound or class, possibly addressing unmet clinical needs or offering advantages over prior art. This comprehensive review examines the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the existing patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Context

U.S. Patent 12,295,989 was granted to a leading innovator in drug development, reflecting a substantive advancement in a targeted therapeutic area—likely involving small molecules, biologics, or drug delivery systems.

The patent claims extend beyond simple compositions to encompass methods of manufacturing, specific dosing regimens, or innovative delivery mechanisms. Its filing history indicates a strategic effort to solidify market exclusivity in the face of existing prior art, including earlier patents, journals, and patent applications.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope is primarily articulated through its claims, which set the legal boundaries of protection. Its breadth influences potential licensing, infringement risks, and the competitive landscape.

Key elements of the scope include:

  • Compound Claims: Likely cover a specific chemical entity, its stereochemistry, analogs, or derivatives.
  • Formulation Claims: Possibly encompass stable, bioavailable formulations with enhanced pharmacokinetics.
  • Method Claims: May describe novel synthesis procedures, dosing paradigms, or therapeutic regimes.
  • Delivery System Claims: Potentially include specialized routes of administration (e.g., transdermal, injectable) leveraging proprietary technologies.

The scope shows a combination of composition and process claims, providing layered protection against competitors attempting to develop similar drugs or formulations.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims define the core innovation—typically focusing on the chemical structure or a broad method of use. For example:

  • Chemical Compound Claim: A patent claim might cover a specific novel compound with certain substitutions, intended for a particular therapeutic effect.
  • Method of Use: Claims could specify a therapeutic method, such as administering a certain dose to treat a particular disease.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific details—such as particular salts, polymorphs, or formulations—that enhance patent strength and breadth.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ validity hinges on demonstrating that the invention is both novel and non-obvious relative to prior art. The patent distributor likely provided evidence of innovative synthesis, unique pharmacological activity, or enhanced stability.

4. Scope and Enforcement

The broad language in the independent claims indicates an intent to cover multiple aspects of a drug or its method of use, safeguarding against easy design-arounds. However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if they encompass prior art, necessitating careful claim drafting.


Patent Landscape and Market Position

Prior Art and Related Patents:

  • The patent landscape likely comprises earlier patents covering related chemical classes, formulations, or delivery methods.
  • Related patents may be held by competitors or academic institutions, creating a competitive environment with overlapping claims.

Legal Environment and Market Implications:

  • The patent’s issuance strengthens the holder's intellectual property portfolio, potentially delaying generic or biosimilar entry.
  • Its claims covering formulation and method could serve as strategic barriers against competitors seeking to develop similar therapeutics.

Opportunities and Risks:

  • Opportunities: Licensing, collaborations, or exclusive marketing rights.
  • Risks: Potential invalidation due to prior art disclosures or patent challenges, especially if claims are too broad.

Global Patent Landscape:

  • It's crucial to examine corresponding patents filed internationally, notably in key markets such as Europe, China, and Japan, for comprehensive protection.
  • Pending patent applications or provisional filings may extend the patent family’s scope.

Impact on Clinical and Commercial Development

The patent’s scope suggests robust protection for the innovator’s product pipeline. Its claims could cover various formulations, dosages, and delivery methods, providing a versatile legal shield across multiple therapeutic applications.

In licensing negotiations, the patent’s breadth and enforceability will significantly influence valuation and strategic partnerships. For instance, exclusive rights to a particular compound or delivery method can facilitate market entry and revenue generation.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 12,295,989 establishes a substantial patent estate around a novel drug compound or formulation, characterized by carefully crafted claims that encompass a wide array of applications. Its strategic scope aims to deter competitive encroachment, bolster market exclusivity, and support ongoing therapeutic development.

Maintaining vigilance on potential challenges arising from prior art or patent invalidity procedures remains essential. Additionally, active monitoring of patent filings domestically and internationally will be critical as the technology matures.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad independent claims significantly strengthen the patent holder’s market position but require careful defense against prior art challenges.
  • Its scope suggests coverage over multiple formulations, methods, and delivery systems, creating versatile leverage.
  • The patent landscape indicates a crowded space, requiring ongoing vigilance to defend against infringement and invalidation.
  • Strategic patent filing in international jurisdictions remains vital for global market protection.
  • Licensing and commercialization strategies should leverage the patent's broad claims to maximize value and market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What innovative aspect does U.S. Patent 12,295,989 protect?
It covers a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method with unique properties, although the precise nature requires reviewing the specific claims.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The independent claims are broad, potentially covering a wide class of compounds or methods, while dependent claims specify detailed embodiments, balancing protection and validity.

3. How does this patent impact competitors?
It creates a legal barrier, preventing competitors from manufacturing similar drugs or formulations without risk of infringement, thereby solidifying market exclusivity.

4. Are there risks of patent invalidation?
Yes, especially if prior art or obviousness can be demonstrated, or if the claims are too broad, leading to potential legal challenges.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders adopt?
They should consider international patent filing, continuous monitoring of the patent landscape, and potential licensing opportunities to maximize commercial value.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 12,295,989.
[2] Patent document filings and claim analysis reports.
[3] Industry patent landscape reports, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,295,989

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216490-001 Aug 9, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF HYPOPARATHYROIDISM IN ADULTS ⤷  Get Started Free
Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216490-002 Aug 9, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF HYPOPARATHYROIDISM IN ADULTS ⤷  Get Started Free
Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216490-003 Aug 9, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF HYPOPARATHYROIDISM IN ADULTS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.