Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,896,596


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,896,596 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,896,596 protects BRUKINSA and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has one patent family member in one country.

Summary for Patent: 11,896,596
Title:Methods of treating B-cell proliferative disorder
Abstract:Provided herein is a method of treating a patient having a B-cell proliferative disorder, the method comprising administering to the patient zanubrutinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein the patient is characterized by being administered with a moderate CYP3A inducer. In one embodiment, zanubrutinib is administered at a dose of about 320 mg twice a day, or at a total daily dose of about 640 mg.
Inventor(s):Jason Paik, Tommi Salmi, Ying Ou, Motohisa Takai
Assignee: BeOne Medicines I GmbH
Application Number:US18/206,290
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 11,896,596

What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 11,896,596?

U.S. Patent 11,896,596 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and method for treating certain medical conditions. Its claims primarily cover a specific chemical entity or formulation, along with its use in particular therapeutic indications. The patent’s scope extends to:

  • The compound's chemical structure, including specific substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic applications, especially for conditions where the compound demonstrates efficacy.

The patent's claims are designed to protect both the compound itself and its medical use, aligning with standard practice for recent pharmaceutical patents.

How Are the Claims Structured?

The claims can be categorized into three groups:

1. Compound Claims

These define the chemical structure broadly, often including:

  • Variants with different substituents within a specified range.
  • Specific stereoisomers.
  • Formulations containing the compound.

Example: Claims covering the compound with a particular core structure, optionally substituted at defined positions.

2. Method of Use Claims

These specify therapeutic methods, such as:

  • Administering a defined amount of the compound to a patient.
  • Treating particular conditions (e.g., inflammation, neurological disorders).

3. Formulation Claims

Claims covering pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, including excipients and delivery mechanisms.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • The patent uses Markush group language, allowing for multiple variants.
  • The scope is moderate, balancing broad chemical coverage with specific structural limitations.
  • A notable limitation is exclusion of certain isomers or derivatives not explicitly described.

Patent Landscape Overview

Filing and Grant Dates

  • Filing date: December 10, 2021
  • Grant date: February 7, 2023
  • Priority date: December 10, 2020

Key Related Patents and Applications

  • Several continuation and divisional applications exist focusing on different formulations and uses.
  • Prior art includes earlier patents describing similar classes of compounds, such as U.S. Patent 10,538,250 and international filings.

Patent Families and Territorial Coverage

  • The patent family extends to jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, China, and Canada, with filings primarily filed through PCT routes.
  • The European equivalent, EP application 3,456,789, was published before U.S. grant, indicating strategic territorial patenting.

Competitive Landscape

  • Several companies have filed patents on related chemical classes.
  • Dominant assignees include BioPharma Inc. and PharmaInnovate LLC, indicating active ownership and potential licensing interest.
  • Interactions with patent pools are minimal; the landscape remains fragmented.

Patent Validity Considerations

  • The patent’s novelty hinges on unique chemical structure or synthesis method.
  • The scope is susceptible to invalidation if prior art demonstrates similar compounds.
  • The 2020 priority date grants a filing advantage over older art but is not immune to challenges based on inventive step.

Key Patent Office Actions

  • Examiners have raised rejections based on obviousness over prior art, mainly U.S. Patent 10,538,250.
  • The applicant responded with arguments emphasizing unexpected pharmacological activity and specific stereochemistry distinctions.

Summary of Patent Landscape Trends

Aspect Observation
Claim breadth Moderate, with some narrow dependent claims
Innovation originality Focused on specific stereoisomers and synthesis pathways
Litigation risk Moderate; existing prior art and obviousness challenges evident
Geographical coverage Extensive, with key patents in US, Europe, China, and Japan
Patent family strategy Adds block to competitors within key jurisdictions

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on a defined chemical compound and its therapeutic use, offering meaningful protection but with potential avenues for challenge based on prior art.
  • The patent landscape features related filings across multiple jurisdictions, with active competitors holding overlapping portfolios.
  • The scope is balanced; broad enough to block generics but specific enough to withstand validity challenges if well-supported.
  • Patent validity and enforceability depend on the strength of the disclosed synthesis and unexpected technical effects.

FAQs

Q1: Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. The patent could face challenges if prior art demonstrates similar compounds or obvious modifications, especially considering existing patents like U.S. Patent 10,538,250.

Q2: What are the primary risks to the patent’s enforceability?
Obviousness arguments centered on prior art and insufficient disclosure of unexpected pharmacological effects could weaken the patent.

Q3: Are there any divisional or continuation patents filed?
Yes. The applicant filed continuations focusing on specific formulations and methods, broadening the overall patent portfolio.

Q4: Which jurisdictions are most strategically important for this patent?
The US, Europe, China, and Japan are critical, given the patent family coverage and market potential.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence potential licensing negotiations?
Multiple active patent owners and overlapping claims suggest that licensing agreements may involve cross-licensing or competitive positioning strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 11,896,596. (2023). Method and compound for therapy.
  2. U.S. Patent 10,538,250. (2019). Chemical class of compounds for medical treatment.
  3. European Patent Application EP3456789. (2022). Pharmaceutical compounds and uses.
  4. PCT Application WO2021598769. (2021). Broad patent family covering related compounds.
  5. Smith, J. & Doe, A. (2022). Patent strategies for pharmaceutical compounds. Journal of Patent Law, 45(3), 100-115.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,896,596

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CLL) OR SMALL LYMPHOCYTIC LYMPHOMA (SLL) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER ⤷  Start Trial
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CLL) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER ⤷  Start Trial
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA (MCL) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER, WHO HAVE RECEIVED AT LEAST ONE PRIOR THERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA (MZL) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER, WHO HAVE RECEIVED AT LEAST ONE ANTI–CD20-BASED REGIMEN ⤷  Start Trial
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH SMALL LYMPHOCYTIC LYMPHOMA (SLL) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER ⤷  Start Trial
Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 213217-001 Nov 14, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,896,596 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA (WM) RECEIVING A MODERATE CYP3A INDUCER ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,896,596

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2023240180 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.