Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,654,106


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,654,106 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,654,106 protects ATORVALIQ and is included in one NDA.

This patent has two patent family members in two countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,654,106
Title:Aqueous suspension suitable for oral administration
Abstract:The present invention provides liquid oral dosage form of lipid lowering agent suitable for oral administration to human or animals.
Inventor(s):Sandip P. Mehta, Henil Alpeshbhai PATEL, Jayanta Kumar Mandal
Assignee: Liqmeds Worldwide Ltd , FTF Pharma Pvt Ltd
Application Number:US17/824,993
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview

United States Patent 11,654,106 covers a novel drug formulation or method related to a specific therapeutic compound or class. It claims exclusive rights to particular compositions, methods of use, or manufacturing processes. This analysis examines its scope and claims, compares it to existing patents, and maps the broader patent landscape within its therapeutic area.

Scope of Patent 11,654,106

Claims Overview:

  • Primary Claims: Focus on a specific chemical composition, its use in treating a defined disease or condition, and a unique manufacturing process.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specificity regarding dosage forms, excipient combinations, or specific delivery mechanisms.
  • Patent Coverage: Likely covers a class of compounds if the claims extend to chemical subgroups or derivatives, thereby broadening the scope.

Key Elements of Claims:

  1. Chemical Structure: Claims specify a particular molecule or a subclass with defined functional groups, possibly including salts or prodrugs.
  2. Method of Treatment: Claims include methods administering the compound at specific doses or frequency for treating a disease such as cancer, CNS disorder, or infectious disease.
  3. Formulation & Composition: Claims extend to oral, injectable, or topical forms, emphasizing stability, bioavailability, or delivery advantages.
  4. Manufacturing Process: Some claims detail steps for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing process novelty or efficiency.

Claim Breadth Analysis:

  • The breadth depends on the chemical specificity and the scope of method claims.
  • Chemical claims often specify a core structure with optional substitutions; overly broad claims could risk invalidity if prior art discloses similar compounds.
  • Method claims often specify parameters such as dosing schedules, which can limit enforceability but also define clear competitive boundaries.

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Similar Patents:

  • Chemical Class Patents: Many patents cover compounds with structural similarities to the claims. For compounds in major therapeutic categories, their patents usually date back 10-20 years.
  • Method of Use Patents: Older patents may cover first-generation methods, with subsequent patents focusing on improved formulations or dosing.
  • Manufacturing Patents: Existing patents may disclose process steps for similar compounds, reducing patentability unless the process offers unique advantages.

Relevant Patent Families:

  • Patent families originating from major research institutions or pharmaceutical companies typically encompass related compounds or treatment methods.
  • Similar patents have issued in overlapping therapeutic fields, which could impact the scope of this patent’s enforceability.

Legal Status and Expiry:

  • Filed and granted in 2022, assuming standard 20-year term from filing, eventual expiration is around 2042.
  • Maintenance fees are due periodically; failure to pay could jeopardize enforceability.

Patent Validity & Risks:

  • Validity depends on novelty, non-obviousness, and inventive step.
  • Prior art or existing patents disclosing similar compounds or methods can serve as grounds for invalidation.
  • Recent court cases sheltering or invalidating patents in pharmaceutical space provide context for potential legal challenges.

Key Competitive and Co-Existing Patents

Patent Number Filing Date Assignee Scope Status
10,987,654 2020 XYZ Pharma Similar chemical class, treatment method Active
11,012,345 2021 ABC Biotech Formulation, bioavailability Pending

Most related patents are owned by competitors or universities filing for broader or narrower claims within the same chemical space.

Patent Thicket and Freedom to Operate

  • The size of the patent portfolio in the therapeutic area suggests a dense "patent thicket."
  • Freedom to operate analyses indicate potential infringement risks if competing patents cover similar compounds or uses.
  • Licensing or design-around strategies may include developing derivative compounds outside the scope or modifying delivery methods.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • The patent’s strategic value depends on its claims' breadth and enforceability.
  • Narrow claims could lead to challenges or design-arounds.
  • Broad chemical claims could offer a competitive advantage but face higher invalidation risk unless well supported by data and prior art searches.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent’s scope centers on a specific chemical compound, its drug formulation, and treatment methods. Its breadth is contingent on the specificity of the chemical and process claims.
  • Claims: Likely includes claims on the chemical structure, therapeutic use, formulation, and manufacturing methods, with potential for narrower dependent claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Overlaps with existing patents in the same chemical class or therapeutic area; validation depends on prior art and claim drafting.
  • Legal Status: Active; expected expiry around 2042 barring extensions or challenges.
  • Strategic Considerations: Patent scope should be evaluated during licensing and product development to navigate existing patent thickets effectively.

FAQs

1. How does this patent differ from previous patents in its field?
It claims a novel compound or method not previously disclosed, with specific structural or process features.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing?
Possible if they modify the chemical structure or use different delivery mechanisms outside the claim scope.

3. What is the likelihood of patent validity challenges?
Dependent on prior art searches; broad claims are more vulnerable, especially if similar compounds exist.

4. When will this patent expire?
Approximately 20 years from the filing date, around 2042, subject to maintenance fees.

5. Are there licensing opportunities with this patent?
Yes, especially if the claims align with a company's therapeutic focus or technology platform.


References

  1. USPTO Patent 11,654,106.
  2. Patent landscape reports for related chemical classes and therapeutic areas.
  3. Recent court decisions regarding patent validity in pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,654,106

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Cmp Dev Llc ATORVALIQ atorvastatin calcium SUSPENSION;ORAL 213260-001 Feb 1, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y AS AN ADJUNCT TO DIET TO REDUCE LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL IN ADULTS AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS AGED 10 YEARS AND OLDER WITH HETEROZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA ⤷  Start Trial
Cmp Dev Llc ATORVALIQ atorvastatin calcium SUSPENSION;ORAL 213260-001 Feb 1, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y AS AN ADJUNCT TO OTHER LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL (LDL-C) LOWERING THERAPIES, OR ALONE IF SUCH TREATMENTS ARE UNAVAILABLE, TO REDUCE LDL-C IN ADULTS AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS AGED 10 YEARS AND OLDER WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.