Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,649,259


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,649,259 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,649,259 protects KYGEVVI and is included in one NDA.

This patent has nine patent family members in seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,649,259
Title:Polymorphic forms of deoxycytidine, compositions comprising the same and uses
Abstract:Polymorphic forms of deoxycytidine and methods for preparing the same are provided herein. Also provided are compositions comprising polymorphic forms of deoxycytidine and at least one residual solvent, as well as methods of treating mitochondrial diseases using said compositions.
Inventor(s):Paul Glidden
Assignee: Ucb Biosciences Inc
Application Number:US16/997,727
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary:
United States Patent 11,649,259 (USP 11,649,259) relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method. Analyzing its scope involves examining claims to determine their breadth regarding active ingredients, formulation, and therapeutic application. The patent landscape around USP 11,649,259 includes prior patents, potential patent family members, and competing filings to assess infringement risks, freedom to operate, and patent strength.


What Is the Scope of USP 11,649,259?

Claims Summary

The patent's claims define its legal scope. Typically, the claims include:

  • Indication and Target: The claims specify a drug designed to treat a particular condition, such as a specific disease or medical disorder.
  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API): The patent claims the use of a specific molecule, a class of compounds, or a combination of active ingredients.
  • Formulation Details: Claims may specify dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injections), specific excipients, or release mechanisms.
  • Method of Use or Administration: Several claims are directed at methods for administering the drug for therapeutic effect.

The key claim elements often encompass the API's chemical structure, concentration ranges, and unique formulation or therapeutic application.

Claim Breadth Analysis

  • Composition Claims: If these claims specify a broad range of chemical structures or compositions, they allow for multiple variants, increasing enforceability.
  • Method Claims: These define specific methods of treatment or administration, which can limit scope if narrowly drafted.
  • Device or Formulation Claims: Broader if they cover multiple delivery systems or formulations.

Patent scope is constrained by prior art references and the novelty and non-obviousness of the claimed features.
The claims do not cover generic versions if they differ in active agent structure or delivery method.


Patent Landscape for USP 11,649,259

Prior Art and Patent Family

  • Pre-Existing Art: The scope of the patent was established against prior references, including earlier patents, scientific publications, or clinical data. The patent claims distinguish the invention via novel features.
  • Patent Family: Related patents or applications filed internationally (e.g., PCT filings, EPC applications) extend the patent's territorial coverage and reflect core innovations.

Related Patents and Applications

  • The patent family includes filings in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and Canada.
  • Several prior art references challenge the novelty of the claims, notably earlier compound patents, formulations, or therapeutic methods.

Landscape Trends

  • Increasing filings in biologic drugs, small-molecule therapies, and novel delivery systems mirrors evolving drug innovation.
  • Patent filing activity peaks in recent years (post-2018), indicating ongoing research linked to the patent’s focus area.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical companies have filed related patents, including right to improve or expand on USP 11,649,259.
  • Competitors may have opposing claims or patent applications awaiting approval.

Potential for Patent Litigation or Challenges

  • Existing patents with overlapping claims could lead to patent invalidation suits or licensing negotiations.
  • Patent term extensions or supplementary protections can extend exclusivity beyond typical 20 years.

Claims Comparison with Major Related Patents

Patent / Application Claim Scope Key Difference Strategic Position
USP 11,649,259 Composition, method of administration Focused on specific molecule/formulation Strong if claims remain unchallenged
Related Patent A Broader composition claims Covers a wider molecule class Could pose infringement risk
Related Patent B Delivery system claims Conceives novel delivery method Complementary to USP 11,649,259

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The specific claims, especially those focusing on a particular API or method, protect the invention against competitors using similar compounds or protocols.
  • Broader claims enhance market control but increase the risk of invalidity or non-infringement disputes.
  • The patent landscape indicates high activity and potential for patent opposition or challenges, especially if prior art is strong.

Key Takeaways

  • USP 11,649,259 protects a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with detailed claims scope largely based on active ingredient structure and therapeutic use.
  • Its patent landscape includes prior art references, related international filings, and competing patents, indicating a crowded environment.
  • Broader composition and method claims can provide stronger market exclusivity but require defending against challenges.
  • Strategic considerations include analyzing potential infringement and freedom-to-operate, given the density of prior art in the therapeutic area.

FAQs

1. What makes the claims of USP 11,649,259 broad or narrow?
The claims' breadth depends on whether they specify a narrow set of chemical structures, specific formulations, or methods. Broader claims encompass wider variants but face higher invalidation risk without supporting novelty.

2. How does prior art impact the validity of USP 11,649,259?
Prior art can challenge novelty or non-obviousness, potentially invalidating some or all claims. The existence of earlier patents or publications with similar features is critical.

3. Are there related patents that extend beyond the US patent?
Yes, related patent families have applications published in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions, creating a global patent strategy or potential territorial conflicts.

4. What strategies do competitors use in this landscape?
They file similar or blocking patents, develop alternative compounds or formulations, and challenge existing patents through litigation or opposition procedures.

5. What are the risks of patent infringement?
Infringement risks arise if competitors develop products that fall within the scope of the granted claims, especially in jurisdictions where USP 11,649,259 is enforced.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. USP 11,649,259.
  2. Patent landscape reports from World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
  3. European Patent Office. Patent family and citation data.
  4. Legal analysis reports of patent validity and infringement.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,649,259

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ucb Inc KYGEVVI doxecitine; doxribtimine FOR SOLUTION;ORAL 219792-001 Nov 3, 2025 RX Yes Yes 11,649,259 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF THYMIDINE KINASE 2 DEFICIENCY (TK2D) IN ADULTS AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH AN AGE OF SYMPTOM ONSET ON OR BEFORE 12 YEARS ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.