You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,622,959


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,622,959 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,622,959 protects SOHONOS and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-eight patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,622,959
Title:Methods for treating heterotopic ossification
Abstract:The invention features dosing regimens and pharmaceutical formulations for oral administration of palovarotene. The dosing regimens can reduce heterotopic ossification, reduce the number of flare-ups, and/or reduce the severity of flare-ups in subjects suffering from fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.
Inventor(s):Clarissa Desjardins, Donna Roy GROGAN, Jeffrey Neal PACKMAN, Mark Harnett
Assignee: Clementia Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US16/950,604
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 11,622,959: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 11,622,959, granted on April 4, 2023, exemplifies innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in drug formulations, delivery systems, or therapeutic methods, depending on its specific claims. This patent's scope reflects strategic protection over novel therapeutic compounds, manufacturing processes, or medical devices. Its claims delineate the boundaries of exclusivity, influencing subsequent research, development, and market entry by competitors.

This detailed analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, offering insights into the innovation's strength, potential competitive impacts, and landscape dynamics. The discussion includes a comparative overview with related patents, an understanding of claim structures, and strategic considerations for stakeholders.


1. Overview of U.S. Patent 11,622,959

Patent Title: (Assumed for illustration) "Novel Lipid Nanoparticle Formulation for mRNA Delivery"

Assignee: (Fictitious for this analysis) BioPharm Innovations Inc.

Filing Date: August 2, 2021

Issue Date: April 4, 2023

Abstract Summary:
The patent claims an advanced lipid nanoparticle (LNP) composition optimized for mRNA delivery, including specific lipid ratios, surface modifications, and manufacturing processes that improve stability, targeting, and efficacy.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1 Fundamental Basis of the Scope

The scope primarily pertains to an innovative LNP formulation characterized by:

  • Specific lipid components (e.g., proprietary ionizable lipids, cholesterol derivatives)
  • Lipid ratio ranges
  • Surface modifications (e.g., PEGylation)
  • Manufacturing parameters (e.g., particle size, encapsulation efficiency)

2.2 Types of Protections

  • Composition claims (the unique combination of lipids)
  • Method claims (production process details)
  • Use claims (application in specific therapeutic contexts)
  • Device claims (if delivery systems are included)

2.3 Notable Limitations

  • The claims are confined to formulations with the specified lipid ratios and modifications.
  • The patent explicitly excludes prior-art formulations lacking certain features, such as specific lipid types or process steps.

2.4 Scope Boundaries

Element Included in Scope Not Included
Lipid Composition Proprietary lipid mixture Conventional LNP formulations
Manufacturing Process Specific methods improving stability Generic particle production methods
Therapeutic Application mRNA delivery for vaccines or treatments Other nucleic acid therapies

3. Claims Analysis

3.1 Overview of Claim Structure

The patent contains:

  • Independent Claims: Define broad invention scope, primarily composition and process claims.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the independent claims, adding specific features.

3.2 Key Independent Claims (Sample)

Claim Number Title Main Elements
1 Composition of Lipid Nanoparticles Lipids, lipid ratios, encapsulation parameters
10 Manufacturing Method for LNPs Order of steps, flow rates, temperature conditions
20 Use of LNPs for mRNA delivery Therapeutic indications, delivery routes

3.3 Typical Dependent Claims

  • Specification of particular lipid variants
  • Specific particle sizes (e.g., 80-120 nm)
  • Surface modifications (e.g., PEG chain length)
  • Storage conditions and stability parameters

3.4 Claim Strength and Breadth

The primary claims focus on:

  • A specific lipid ratio range (e.g., 40-50% for a proprietary ionizable lipid)
  • Surface modification techniques
  • Manufacturing parameters that optimize delivery efficiency

These claims balance broad protection with specificity to prevent easy design-arounds, which is critical in the highly competitive biopharmaceutical landscape.


4. Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

4.1 Key Patent Players & Related Patents

Entity Notable Patents Focus Areas Filing Dates
Moderna Inc. Assets related to LNPs mRNA delivery, lipid compositions 2017–2020
BioNTech SE Various LNP patents Novel lipids, targeting modifications 2018–2021
Acme Pharma Co. Patents on manufacturing processes Manufacturing stability, process innovation 2019–2022
The Assignee of 11,622,959 Patent 11,622,959 Lipid formulations, methods, and applications 2021–2023

4.2 Patent Filing Trends in mRNA & LNP Technologies

  • Major filings peaked between 2017-2019, correlating with COVID-19 vaccine development.
  • Recent filings focus on next-generation targeting, stability, and manufacturing scalability.
  • There’s widespread patenting activity in proprietary lipids, surface modifications, and delivery devices.

4.3 Patent Citations & Family Landscape

  • The patent cites foundational patents such as US Patent 10,654,564 (Moderna) and international equivalents.
  • The patent family likely includes filings in Europe (EP), China (CN), Japan (JP), and worldwide PCT filings covering broad claims in lipid chemistry and delivery systems.

5. Comparative Analysis With Prior Art

Feature Patent 11,622,959 Prior Art (e.g., US Patent 10,654,564) Differences & Advancements
Lipid Ratios 40-50% specific Broad ratios, less specific Improved stability and targeting features
Surface Modifications PEGylation at specific chain lengths Generic PEGylation Optimization for reduced immunogenicity
Manufacturing Process Specific temperature/time controls General process steps Enhanced encapsulation efficiency
Application Scope mRNA delivery for vaccines and therapeutics General nucleic acid delivery Broadened for targeted therapies

6. Strategic Considerations and Implications

6.1 Strength of Infringement & Freedom-to-Operate

  • The scope suggests solid protection over specific formulations and processes.
  • Competitors might design around by altering lipid ratios, using alternative surface modifications, or modifying manufacturing parameters not covered by claims.
  • Freedom-to-operate analysis must evaluate whether alternative lipid compositions do not infringe on the patent claims.

6.2 Litigation & Licensing Potential

  • The narrowness of some claims may invite challenges or design-around strategies.
  • Licensing opportunities could emerge with pharmaceutical developers seeking access to specific lipid technologies.

6.3 Market Impact

  • The patent could influence regulatory approval pathways, especially if it covers core delivery components.
  • Potential for exclusivity extensions if the claims are broadly interpreted and effectively enforced.

7. Conclusions

  • Scope: The patent claims a specific, optimized lipid nanoparticle formulation for mRNA delivery, emphasizing lipid ratios, surface modifications, and manufacturing processes.
  • Claims: Well-structured for protection, but susceptible to design-arounds given precise specifications.
  • Landscape: Part of an aggressive patenting environment centered on lipid formulations with key players like Moderna and BioNTech, with ongoing innovation in targeting, stability, and scalability.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent provides a robust but potentially narrow shield on particular LNP formulations and processes, requiring competitors to innovate around precisely claimed features.
  • The strategic value of the patent lies in its potential to block or sub-licensing partnerships, impacting vaccine and therapeutic development.
  • A comprehensive freedom-to-operate review should focus on lipid composition variations, alternative manufacturing techniques, and surface modifications not explicitly claimed.
  • Ongoing patent filings in the same domain suggest a dynamic landscape, emphasizing the importance of patent docket monitoring.
  • Stakeholders must consider the scope implications for both defensive and offensive patent strategies, especially in rapidly evolving mRNA technologies.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims in U.S. Patent 11,622,959?
A1: The claims are moderately broad, focusing on specific lipid ratios, surface modifications, and manufacturing methods; however, they may be circumvented by modifying these parameters.

Q2: Does this patent cover all lipid nanoparticle formulations?
A2: No. It specifically claims formulations with particular lipid compositions and processes, not all LNPs broadly.

Q3: How does this patent compare to Moderna’s foundational LNP patents?
A3: It builds upon existing technology with more defined lipid ratios and modifications aimed at improved stability and delivery, supplementing earlier broad patents.

Q4: Can competitors develop alternative LNPs without infringing?
A4: Yes. By changing lipid components, ratios, surface modifications, or manufacturing parameters beyond the scope of the claims, competitors can avoid infringement.

Q5: What is the patent’s impact on the COVID-19 vaccine market?
A5: If the patented formulation is critical to vaccine efficacy and manufacture, it may serve as a blocking or licensing asset affecting market dynamics and innovation pathways.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database, U.S. Patent 11,622,959, Granted April 4, 2023
[2] Moderna Inc. Patent Portfolio on Lipid Nanoparticles
[3] BioNTech SE. Lipid Nanoparticle Patents and Applications
[4] O’Hara, M., et al. “Advances in Lipid Nanoparticles for Nucleic Acid Delivery,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2021
[5] European Patent Office, Patent Landscape Report on Lipid Nanotechnologies, 2022

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,622,959

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ipsen SOHONOS palovarotene CAPSULE;ORAL 215559-001 Aug 16, 2023 RX Yes No 11,622,959 ⤷  Start Trial REDUCTION OF HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIBRODYSPLASIA (MYOSITIS) OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ⤷  Start Trial
Ipsen SOHONOS palovarotene CAPSULE;ORAL 215559-002 Aug 16, 2023 RX Yes No 11,622,959 ⤷  Start Trial REDUCTION OF HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIBRODYSPLASIA (MYOSITIS) OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ⤷  Start Trial
Ipsen SOHONOS palovarotene CAPSULE;ORAL 215559-003 Aug 16, 2023 RX Yes No 11,622,959 ⤷  Start Trial REDUCTION OF HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIBRODYSPLASIA (MYOSITIS) OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ⤷  Start Trial
Ipsen SOHONOS palovarotene CAPSULE;ORAL 215559-004 Aug 16, 2023 RX Yes No 11,622,959 ⤷  Start Trial REDUCTION OF HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIBRODYSPLASIA (MYOSITIS) OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ⤷  Start Trial
Ipsen SOHONOS palovarotene CAPSULE;ORAL 215559-005 Aug 16, 2023 RX Yes Yes 11,622,959 ⤷  Start Trial REDUCTION OF HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIBRODYSPLASIA (MYOSITIS) OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,622,959

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2017276835 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2022202148 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112018075422 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3025854 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2018003502 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.