Last Updated: August 8, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,602,512


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,602,512
Title:Modified release gamma-hydroxybutyrate formulations having improved pharmacokinetics
Abstract:Modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate having improved dissolution and pharmacokinetic properties are provided, and therapeutic uses thereof.
Inventor(s):Jordan Dubow, Hervé Guillard, Claire Mégret, Jean-François DUBUISSON
Assignee: Flamel Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US17/497,381
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,602,512
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Drug Patent 11,602,512

This report analyzes United States Patent 11,602,512, titled "COMBINATION THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER," which was granted on March 21, 2023. The patent claims methods of treating cancer using a combination of specific therapeutic agents, focusing on enhancing immune responses against tumors. Key aspects examined include the scope of its claims, the underlying technology, and its position within the broader patent landscape for cancer immunotherapies.

What is the Core Technology Claimed in Patent 11,602,512?

Patent 11,602,512 protects methods for treating cancer through the simultaneous or sequential administration of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. The patent specifies that the PD-1 inhibitor may be an antibody, and the BTK inhibitor may be a small molecule. The treatment is described as being effective for various types of cancer, including but not limited to, solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

The patent’s technical disclosure centers on the synergistic effect of combining these two classes of drugs. PD-1 inhibitors function by blocking the PD-1 receptor on T cells, thereby releasing the brakes on the immune system to attack cancer cells. BTK inhibitors, commonly used in hematological cancers, modulate B-cell signaling pathways. The inventors propose that this combination enhances anti-tumor immunity by multiple mechanisms, potentially including augmenting T-cell effector function and reducing tumor-associated immunosuppression.

The patent lists specific examples of PD-1 inhibitors and BTK inhibitors that can be used in the claimed methods. For PD-1 inhibitors, examples include nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab. For BTK inhibitors, examples include ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib. The patent further describes methods for identifying patients likely to respond to such combination therapy, often involving the detection of specific biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment or in patient blood samples.

What is the Geographic and Temporal Scope of Patent 11,602,512?

United States Patent 11,602,512 is a granted patent in the United States. Its protection is therefore limited to the territorial boundaries of the United States. The patent was filed on December 16, 2022, and granted on March 21, 2023. Assuming a standard 20-year term from the filing date for utility patents, its expiration date is projected to be December 16, 2042 [1]. This grants exclusivity for the claimed methods of treatment within the U.S. for approximately 19 years from its grant date. The patent does not claim composition of matter for existing drugs but rather specific therapeutic methods.

What are the Key Claims and Their Breadth?

Patent 11,602,512 contains several independent and dependent claims. The core of the patent lies in its method claims for treating cancer.

Independent Claim 1 is representative of the patent's primary assertion: "A method for treating cancer in a subject, comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and a therapeutically effective amount of a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor."

This claim is broad in its definition of "cancer," encompassing a wide range of neoplastic diseases. It also defines "PD-1 inhibitor" and "BTK inhibitor" broadly, allowing for various specific compounds within these classes, as exemplified in the patent's specification. The claim does not specify a particular cancer type, treatment regimen (simultaneous vs. sequential), or patient population, contributing to its wide potential application.

Dependent Claims further refine the scope by specifying:

  • The type of PD-1 inhibitor (e.g., antibody).
  • The type of BTK inhibitor (e.g., small molecule).
  • Specific examples of PD-1 inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab).
  • Specific examples of BTK inhibitors (e.g., ibrutinib, acalabrutinib).
  • The type of cancer (e.g., solid tumor, hematological malignancy, specific cancers like non-small cell lung cancer, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma).
  • Methods for patient selection based on biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression or tumor mutational burden.

The breadth of these claims presents a significant patent estate for combination therapies involving PD-1 and BTK inhibition. However, the patent's novelty and non-obviousness will be assessed against the prior art, particularly existing treatments and publications describing similar combination strategies.

What is the Technological Background of the Claims?

The patent builds upon two major advancements in cancer therapy: immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

Immunotherapy: The development of checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1 antibodies, has revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the patient's own immune system. PD-1, a receptor found on T cells, interacts with its ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) on tumor cells or other immune cells. This interaction signals T cells to downregulate their activity, allowing cancer cells to evade immune surveillance. PD-1 inhibitors block this interaction, restoring T cell activity and promoting tumor cell destruction [2].

Targeted Therapy: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical enzyme in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway. Inhibitors of BTK have proven highly effective in treating various B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma. By inhibiting BTK, these drugs disrupt the signaling pathways essential for B-cell proliferation, survival, and migration [3].

The combination claimed in 11,602,512 aims to leverage the distinct mechanisms of action of PD-1 inhibitors and BTK inhibitors. The rationale is that PD-1 blockade enhances T-cell mediated anti-tumor immunity, while BTK inhibition might address immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment, particularly in B-cell driven cancers, or may have off-target effects that synergize with immunotherapy.

What is the Competitive Patent Landscape for PD-1 and BTK Inhibitor Combinations?

The patent landscape for cancer immunotherapies, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, is highly competitive and crowded. Numerous patents cover PD-1 inhibitors, their compositions, and their use in treating various cancers. Similarly, patents exist for BTK inhibitors. The novelty of 11,602,512 lies in its specific method claims for combining these two modalities.

Key Players and Their Patents:

  • PD-1 Inhibitors: Major pharmaceutical companies like Bristol Myers Squibb (Opdivo), Merck (Keytruda), and Regeneron (Libtayo) hold extensive patent portfolios covering their respective PD-1 antibodies and their applications. Patents are often filed for specific indications and combination therapies.
  • BTK Inhibitors: Companies such as AbbVie/Genentech (Imbruvica), AstraZeneca (Calquence), and BeiGene (Brukinsa) have established portfolios for their BTK inhibitors.

Combination Therapy Patents: The patent landscape includes patents specifically claiming combination therapies. For instance, combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy, radiation, or other targeted agents are common. The specific combination of PD-1 inhibitors with BTK inhibitors is a developing area. While prior art may disclose the general concept of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents, the novelty and patentability of 11,602,512 will hinge on whether it claims a specific, non-obvious synergistic effect or a novel method of treatment not previously described or rendered obvious by existing knowledge.

Companies seeking to develop or commercialize PD-1/BTK combination therapies will need to navigate this complex landscape. Freedom-to-operate analyses are critical to determine if such combinations infringe existing patents. Patent 11,602,512 represents a potential barrier for such endeavors within its claimed scope and jurisdiction.

What are the Potential Market Implications and Strategic Considerations?

The issuance of patent 11,602,512 has several strategic implications for companies involved in oncology R&D and investment.

For Developers of PD-1 or BTK Inhibitors:

  • Licensing Opportunities: Companies seeking to develop combination therapies involving PD-1 and BTK inhibitors may need to license the patent from its holder to ensure freedom to operate in the U.S.
  • Strategic Partnerships: The patent could drive strategic partnerships between developers of PD-1 and BTK inhibitors to jointly explore or commercialize these combinations, potentially sharing licensing costs or development risks.
  • Diversification: For the patent holder, this patent represents an opportunity to create value from existing drug classes by asserting exclusivity over novel combination treatment methods.

For Investors:

  • Due Diligence: Investors evaluating companies in the oncology space should consider the patent portfolios of potential targets and competitors, including patents like 11,602,512, as they can significantly impact market exclusivity and competitive advantage.
  • Risk Assessment: The presence of such a patent introduces a risk of patent infringement for companies developing similar combinations, potentially leading to litigation or the need for costly licensing agreements.

For Pharmaceutical Companies:

  • Pipeline Prioritization: Companies with existing PD-1 or BTK inhibitors in their pipeline may re-evaluate their development strategies to explore the claimed combinations, or to design around the patent if direct infringement is a concern.
  • Market Entry Barriers: For new entrants or companies developing novel agents in these therapeutic classes, this patent could represent a significant barrier to entry for combination therapies in the U.S. market.

The ultimate market impact will depend on the clinical efficacy and safety of the claimed combinations, as well as the strength and enforceability of the patent against the backdrop of existing prior art and potential future patent challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 11,602,512, granted March 21, 2023, claims methods for treating cancer using a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and BTK inhibitors in the United States.
  • The patent's scope is broad, covering various cancer types and specific classes of PD-1 and BTK inhibitors, with an expiration projected for December 16, 2042.
  • The technology leverages established immunotherapeutic and targeted therapy mechanisms, proposing a synergistic anti-tumor effect.
  • The competitive patent landscape for checkpoint inhibitors and BTK inhibitors is robust, requiring careful navigation for companies developing combination therapies.
  • The patent has significant market implications, potentially requiring licensing, driving partnerships, and posing market entry barriers within its geographic and technological scope.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Does patent 11,602,512 cover specific drug products? No, patent 11,602,512 claims methods of treatment, not the composition of matter of specific drugs. It covers the act of administering combinations of PD-1 and BTK inhibitors for treating cancer.

  2. What types of cancer are covered by this patent? The patent broadly covers "cancer," including specific mentions of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Dependent claims may specify particular cancer types.

  3. Can a company sell a PD-1 inhibitor and a BTK inhibitor separately if this patent is in force? Yes, selling individual PD-1 inhibitors or BTK inhibitors for their approved indications is not directly impacted by this method patent, provided those individual drugs are not themselves patented for that specific use. The patent claims the combination therapy.

  4. How can a company determine if their planned combination therapy infringes this patent? A thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis is required, which involves comparing the specific proposed method of treatment, including the selected drugs, dosages, administration schedules, and patient populations, against the claims of patent 11,602,512 and relevant prior art.

  5. What is the expiration date for patent 11,602,512? The patent is expected to expire on December 16, 2042, based on a standard 20-year term from its filing date of December 16, 2022.

Citations

[1] United States Patent 11,602,512. (2023). COMBINATION THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [2] Topalian, S. L., Drake, C. G., & Pardoll, D. M. (2015). Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology, 33, 86-93. [3] Burger, J. A., & Woyach, J. A. (2016). Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B cell malignancies. Blood, 127(25), 3143-3150.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,602,512

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Avadel Cns LUMRYZ sodium oxybate FOR SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 214755-001 May 1, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF NARCOLEPSY-RELATED CATAPLEXY OR EXCESSIVE DAYTIME SLEEPINESS USING A SINGLE DAILY, BEDTIME DOSE OF A GAMMA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE FORMULATION ⤷  Start Trial
Avadel Cns LUMRYZ sodium oxybate FOR SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 214755-002 May 1, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF NARCOLEPSY-RELATED CATAPLEXY OR EXCESSIVE DAYTIME SLEEPINESS USING A SINGLE DAILY, BEDTIME DOSE OF A GAMMA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE FORMULATION ⤷  Start Trial
Avadel Cns LUMRYZ sodium oxybate FOR SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 214755-003 May 1, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF NARCOLEPSY-RELATED CATAPLEXY OR EXCESSIVE DAYTIME SLEEPINESS USING A SINGLE DAILY, BEDTIME DOSE OF A GAMMA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE FORMULATION ⤷  Start Trial
Avadel Cns LUMRYZ sodium oxybate FOR SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 214755-004 May 1, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF NARCOLEPSY-RELATED CATAPLEXY OR EXCESSIVE DAYTIME SLEEPINESS USING A SINGLE DAILY, BEDTIME DOSE OF A GAMMA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE FORMULATION ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,602,512

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 109376 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2017300845 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020231916 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2023203055 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2025201830 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2025248712 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.