You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,966,990


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,966,990
Title:Midazolam in flexible bags
Abstract:Terminally sterilized, preservative-free aqueous midazolam solution comprising 0.25 to 1.5 mg/ml of midazolam, a tonicity adjusting agent to provide an osmolality of from 260 and 320 mosm/kg and sufficient acid and optionally a base to provide a pH of from about 2.5 to 3.5 with the remainder water for injection packaged in a flexible plastic container.
Inventor(s):Sergio Dusci
Assignee: Inforlife SA
Application Number:US16/013,722
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,966,990
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 10,966,990


Introduction

United States Patent 10,966,990 (hereafter referred to as the '990 patent) pertains to innovative advancements within the pharmaceutical domain, specifically relating to novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. This patent embodies a significant element of the patent landscape, offering strategic advantages for patent holders and influencing subsequent innovation trajectories. This analysis explores the scope and claims of the '990 patent, contextualizes its position within the patent landscape, and discusses its implications for the pharmaceutical industry.


Scope and Core Claims of Patent 10,966,990

1. Overview of Patent Content

The '990 patent primarily encompasses a novel class of chemical compounds with purported therapeutic efficacy, alongside their synthesis methods, formulations, and potential medical applications. Claims are structured to protect both the specific compounds and their derivatives, as well as methods of manufacturing and administering these molecules.

2. Key Claims Breakdown

The patent's claims can be categorized into several core areas:

  • Compound Composition Claims:
    These define the chemical entities, often specific molecules or a class thereof, including substitution patterns, stereochemistry, and purity specifications. For example, claims might specify particular core structures with defined substituents that confer desired pharmacological properties.

  • Synthesis and Production Claims:
    Covering methods for producing the claimed compounds, such as specific reaction sequences, catalysts, or purification techniques. These claims aim to cover efficient, scalable production processes.

  • Pharmacological Use Claims:
    Encompass methods of using the compounds to treat specific conditions, such as cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases. These typically are "use" claims or "method of treatment" claims.

  • Formulation Claims:
    Covering pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds, including dosage forms, excipients, and delivery mechanisms such as oral, injectable, or topical formulations.

  • Combination and Delivery Claims:
    Claims directed toward combining the compounds with other active agents or employing novel delivery systems, intended to broaden patent protection scope.

3. Claim Language and Scope

The claims in the '990 patent are drafted with broad language to encompass a wide scope of derivatives and applications. For example, the compound claims often include Markush groups, facilitating coverage over a series of related molecules. The use of functional language, such as "effective amount" or "therapeutically active dose," enhances the scope for various medical indications.

4. Limitations and Narrowing Factors

While claims are broad, they include limitations tied to specific chemical structures and synthesis methods. The scope is ultimately constrained by the inventive step, novelty, and written description, as highlighted during patent prosecution. These limitations are critical for assessing infringement risks and landscape positioning.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patent Families and Daughter Patents

The '990 patent exists within a network of patent applications and granted patents, which include:

  • Priority and Priority-Claimed Applications:
    The original priority filings often originate from university labs, biotech startups, or established pharma companies focused on small molecule therapeutics.

  • International Patent Family:
    Patent families are often filed via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, aiming for protection across key markets such as Europe, Japan, and China.

  • Follow-on and Continuation Patents:
    These expand the scope, cover new formulations, additional therapeutic claims, or improved synthesis methods.

2. Competitive Patent Holders

Key industry players likely involved include established pharmaceutical firms specializing in targeted therapies or small molecule drugs, possibly competing in oncology or neurological disorder treatments. Startups with innovative compound libraries may also be significant stakeholders seeking competitive IP positions.

3. Citation and Litigation History

The '990 patent has been cited in both patent office examinations and litigation cases, indicating its strategic significance. Citations by subsequent patents suggest it is a foundation for secondary innovations, often a measure of its importance within the landscape.

4. Patent Validity and Challenges

Given the complexity of chemical patent claims, validation depends heavily on prior art searches, inventive step analysis, and the sufficiency of disclosure. Challenges may include arguments of obviousness based on known chemical scaffolds, especially if similar compounds or mechanisms are publicly available.


Implications for Innovation and Industry

The scope of the '990 patent gives it a substantial protective umbrella for the subject compounds and their applications. This can delay generic entry, influence R&D investments, and shape licensing strategies. Its broad claims also pose potential obstacles for competitors and generate enforcement activities, including litigation or licensing negotiations.

Risks and Opportunities

  • Risks:
    Narrow patent claims or invalidation challenges reduce exclusivity. Overly broad claims can lead to court invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step.

  • Opportunities:
    Companies can build around this patent by designing different chemical classes, developing alternative synthesis routes, or targeting different therapeutic areas covered under the patent's claims.


Conclusion

United States Patent 10,966,990 secures protective rights over a novel chemical compound class, associated formulations, and therapeutic uses. Its claims are broad and strategically defined to encompass various derivatives and applications, asserting significant control within its targeted therapeutic area. The patent landscape surrounding the '990 patent is dynamic, reflecting ongoing innovation, litigation, and global patent filings. Stakeholders must carefully interpret its scope for competitive positioning, licensing, and infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • The '990 patent covers specific chemical compounds, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic methods, with claims designed to ensure broad protection.
  • Its strategic positioning influences R&D direction, licensing negotiations, and potential market exclusivity periods.
  • Ongoing patent filings and litigation highlight its significance within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.
  • Validity hinges on novelty and non-obviousness, necessitating continual prior art monitoring.
  • Competitive players may seek to design around the patent or challenge its scope to enable innovation freedom.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the main therapeutic applications claimed in the '990 patent?
The patent claims apply to compounds and methods suitable for treating conditions such as cancers, neurological disorders, or infections, depending on the specific therapeutic focus disclosed.

2. How broad are the chemical claims in the '990 patent?
The chemical claims utilize Markush groups and functional language to cover a wide class of derivatives, enabling protection over numerous related compounds within the defined structural framework.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing the '990 patent?
Yes, by designing around the specific structural limitations or utilizing different chemical scaffolds not covered in the claims, competitors can avoid infringement.

4. How does the patent landscape affect generic drug entry?
The broad claims may delay generic approvals until the patent expires or unless challenged successfully, impacting market dynamics and pricing.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ to extend the life of protection beyond the '990 patent?
Filing follow-up patents on improved formulations, new therapeutic uses, or synthesis methods can prolong patent protection and maintain market exclusivity.


Sources:

[1] United States Patent 10,966,990.
[2] Patent Office Records and Filings.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports and Industry Analysis Documents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,966,990

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Inforlife MIDAZOLAM IN 0.9% SODIUM CHLORIDE midazolam SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 211844-001 Mar 22, 2021 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Inforlife MIDAZOLAM IN 0.9% SODIUM CHLORIDE midazolam SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 211844-002 Mar 22, 2021 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.