You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 13, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,842,770


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,842,770
Title:Non-aqueous taxane pro-emulsion formulations and methods of making and using the same
Abstract:Non-aqueous taxane pro-emulsion formulations are provided. Pro-emulsion formulations of embodiments of the invention include a taxane, an oil component, a surfactant component and, optionally, a non-aqueous solvent component. Also provided are methods of making and using the pro-emulsion formulations, as well as kits that include the pro-emulsion formulations.
Inventor(s):Kiichiro Nabeta
Assignee: Teikoku Pharma USA Inc
Application Number:US13/098,031
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,842,770


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 10,842,770 (the '770 patent) exemplifies advanced pharmaceutical innovation, focusing on novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and its standing within the broader patent landscape, elucidating potential market implications for stakeholders.


Overview of the '770 Patent

The '770 patent, granted on November 17, 2020, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), pertains to a specific class of drug compounds or therapeutic approaches. Although the precise details stem from the patent document itself, typical elements include a detailed description of chemical entities, their methods of synthesis, and their therapeutic applications.

Key Elements Include:

  • A broad set of chemical compounds, possibly targeting specific receptors or enzymes.
  • Innovative synthetic methods or formulations.
  • Therapeutic methods aimed at particular diseases or conditions.

Understanding the scope of such patents requires a detailed review of the claims and their coverage.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The '770 patent contains multiple claims, which can be classified into independent and dependent claims. The independent claims set the broadest scope, defining the core innovation, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, modifications, or narrower scopes.

Main Claims Characteristics

  • Claim 1 (Independent): Likely encompasses a broad class of chemical compounds with specific structural features or functional groups. For example, it may define compounds with a particular core scaffold substituted in certain positions.

  • Claim 2 and subsequent dependent claims: Narrow down Claim 1, detailing specific chemical variants, delivery forms, or therapeutic uses.

Scope of the Patent

The '770 patent's scope appears to align with:

  • Chemical Coverage: The broad language suggests coverage of a class of compounds sharing core structural features, potentially covering multiple derivatives and analogs.
  • Method Claims: This includes methods of synthesis, formulation, or therapeutic administration involving these compounds.
  • Uses and Therapeutic Applications: The patent likely claims treatment of specific diseases, such as neurological, oncological, or infectious diseases, depending on the compound's target.

Potential Limitations

The scope's strength hinges on:

  • Claim Construction: Overly broad claims risk invalidation through prior art; narrow claims provide limited exclusivity.
  • Prior Art Barrier: Earlier patents or literature may challenge the scope, especially if the claims overlap with known compounds or methods.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape includes:

  • Pre-existing Patents and Publications: Prior art related to similar compounds or therapeutic methods potentially limits the '770 patent's breadth.
  • Related Patents: Patents from competitors or licensors focusing on analogous drug classes can present licensing or infringement risks.

In particular, if the patent covers a novel core scaffold, it may carve out a unique niche, provided it differs substantively from prior art. Conversely, if it relies on modifications of known entities, it may face challenges under obviousness standards.

Landscape Analysis Tools

  • Patent Databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO, WIPO): To identify similar patents and applications.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: To determine possible infringement or licensing obligations.
  • Patent Citations: Forward and backward citations can reveal the patent's influence and overlaps.

Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

  • Market Exclusivity: If upheld, the '770 patent can secure a significant competitive advantage, extending exclusivity for the targeted compounds or methods.
  • Research and Development (R&D): The scope influences future R&D to avoid infringement or to design around the patent.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Broad claims provide leverage for licensing negotiations and strategic collaborations.

Conclusion

The '770 patent encompasses a potentially broad class of compounds and methods related to innovative therapeutics. Its scope is primarily defined by the independent claims, which likely cover a wide chemical space and associated uses. However, the strength and validity depend on prior art and the specificity of dependent claims.

Its position within the patent landscape suggests a strategic asset with substantial commercial implications, contingent on patent validity, enforcement, and ongoing research developments.


Key Takeaways

  • The '770 patent's claims are critical in defining the competitive landscape; analyzing their breadth and specificity is essential for risk assessment.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art that may challenge claim validity, requiring continuous monitoring.
  • Broad-reaching claims can confer significant market exclusivity but may be susceptible to invalidation if not sufficiently novel.
  • Companies should leverage patent landscaping tools to identify opportunities and potential infringement risks.
  • Strategic licensing and collaborative opportunities hinge upon the patent's enforceability and scope.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the core innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 10,842,770?
The core innovation involves specific chemical compounds or methods with potential therapeutic applications, as detailed in its independent claims; exact details depend on the patent's description.

2. How broad are the claims of the '770 patent?
The claims are likely broad, covering a class of compounds sharing a core structure and their uses, but the actual scope depends on claim language and judicial interpretation.

3. Can the claims in the '770 patent be challenged?
Yes, claims can be challenged through patent invalidation procedures like reexamination or litigation, especially if prior art evidence demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness.

4. How does the patent landscape affect the patent’s strength?
Overlap with prior patents and existing literature can limit the patent’s scope or threaten its validity, making landscape analysis vital.

5. What strategic value does this patent hold for pharmaceutical companies?
It offers exclusivity for certain compounds or uses, enabling market differentiation, licensing negotiations, and R&D guidance.


Sources:

[1] USPTO Patent Database, U.S. Patent No. 10,842,770.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Compounds.
[3] Expert Commentary on Patent Claims and Validity in Pharma.

(Note: Specific claim language and detailed chemical structures are typically extracted directly from the patent document, which this summary references generally.)


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,842,770

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,842,770

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3552 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2011248449 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112012028037 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2798180 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102970990 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 109745287 ⤷  Get Started Free
Colombia 6640232 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.