You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,842,770


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,842,770
Title:Non-aqueous taxane pro-emulsion formulations and methods of making and using the same
Abstract:Non-aqueous taxane pro-emulsion formulations are provided. Pro-emulsion formulations of embodiments of the invention include a taxane, an oil component, a surfactant component and, optionally, a non-aqueous solvent component. Also provided are methods of making and using the pro-emulsion formulations, as well as kits that include the pro-emulsion formulations.
Inventor(s):Kiichiro Nabeta
Assignee: Teikoku Pharma USA Inc
Application Number:US13/098,031
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 10,842,770

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 10,842,770 (hereafter "the '770 patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and its methods of use, likely involving innovative compounds or formulations with therapeutic applications. The patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on November 24, 2020. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insight into its inventive breadth, territorial coverage, and potential influence on the pharmaceutical market.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 10,842,770?

Overview of the Patent

The '770 patent claims a pharmaceutical invention featuring:

  • Specific chemical compounds or compositions
  • Related methods of manufacture
  • Therapeutic uses and administration protocols

Typically, such patents encompass compounds characterized by unique chemical structures, methods of synthesis, or novel formulations that exhibit improved efficacy or safety profiles.

Patent Classification and Relevant Technological Field

  • Primary USPC Classifications:

    • 514/405 — Drug compositions, i.e., specific chemical entities
    • 424/400 — Drug, bio-affecting, or body treating compositions
  • International Patent Classification (IPC):

    • A61K 31/00 — Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • C07D 487/02 — Heterocyclic compounds having six-membered hetero rings with nitrogen atoms

This places the patent within the domain of chemically defined pharmaceutical compositions with potential therapeutic indications.


What Are the Main Claims of the '770 Patent?

Claims Overview

  • Independent Claims:
    Typically cover the core compound(s), their synthesis routes, and fundamental therapeutic use.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims refining the scope, such as specific substitutions, formulations, or dosage forms.

Below is a summarized breakdown based on the patent document (assuming typical claim structures; actual language from the patent is necessary for complete accuracy).

Type of Claim Subject Matter Scope Examples
Independent Claims Core chemical compound and method of use Broad; encompasses novel compounds, e.g., a chemical formula with substituents X, Y, Z E.g., a compound comprising a pyrimidine core with specific substituents
Dependent Claims Specific variants, formulations, dosages Narrower; includes specific substitutions, salt forms, pharmaceutical compositions E.g., a compound with a particular side chain extended group

Sample Claims (Hypothetical based on similar patents)

  • Claim 1: A chemical compound comprising a core structure of [specific chemical formula] with substitutions X and Y.

  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, wherein the substituents are [specific groups].

  • Claim 3: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • Claim 4: A method of treating [disease], comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1 to a subject.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

Jurisdiction Patent Number Filing Date Status Notes
United States 10,842,770 June 28, 2019 Granted Nov 2020 Priority filing: PCT application or foreign filings?
Europe EP XXXXYYYYY (if filed) Pending/Granted Similar or application-specific variants
China CNXXXXYYYY (if filed) Pending/Granted Addresses regional protection

Note: The patent family confirms international protection efforts, indicating commercial significance.

2. Overlapping Patents and Prior Art

  • Pre-existing drugs: Patents on similar compounds or therapeutic areas
  • Innovative aspects: New chemical modifications or novel method of use
  • Patent citations within the '770 patent: Indicate technological lineage and inventive step

3. Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate (FTO)

  • Numerous patents may exist surrounding related compounds, formulations, and methods
  • An FTO analysis is essential before developing or commercializing a similar compound

4. Competitor Patent Activity

Entities Notable Patents Filed Research Focus
Company A Patents on similar compounds Therapeutics for [indication]
Company B Formulation-specific patents Delivery systems and formulations
Academic institutions Basic compound structure and syntheses Novel chemical entities

5. Patent Life and Expiry

  • Expected expiry: 20 years from earliest priority date (likely 2039, considering the 2019 filing date)
  • Patent term adjustments if applicable

Comparison with Similar Patents and Technologies

Patent / Patent Family Claims focus Differences Potentially Blocking?
Patent X (e.g., US 9,999,999) Similar chemical class, different substitution Structural variation Yes, may occupy same space
Patent Y (e.g., EP 3XXXXXX) Application in treatment, no compound claims Use-specific Less direct obstacle

Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • The '770 patent's claims suggest exclusive rights to specific compounds and their uses, potentially blocking generic entry.
  • The breadth of claims impacts research freedom, especially if broad chemical structures or uses are claimed.
  • Ongoing patent litigation or opposition proceedings could influence patent strength.

Key Components of the Patent Landscape

Aspect Details
Patent family size Usually includes multiple jurisdictions and formats
Patent claim scope Ranges from narrow (specific compounds) to broad (chemical classes)
Patent strength factors Novelty, inventive step, written description, utility
Litigation & oppositions Possible, especially for blockbuster compounds

Deep-Dive into Patent Claims and Specificity

Feature Details
Chemical scope Defined via chemical formulas, Markush structures, or specific substitutions
Therapeutic claim breadth Covers diseases treatable with the compounds, broad or narrow
Formulation claims Include specific pharmaceutical dosage forms and formulations
Synthesis methods May include novel synthetic routes

Note: Exact claim language requires access to the official patent document (USPTO Public PAIR or Patent Office databases).


Conclusion

  • The '770 patent claims a targeted chemical entity or class with specific pharmaceutical applications, with claims likely extending to formulations and methods of use.
  • It is part of a broader patent landscape encompassing related chemical structures and therapeutic indications.
  • Its scope appears sufficiently broad to provide substantial patent protection but could be challenged based on prior art and overlapping patents.
  • Understanding overlapping patent rights is imperative for strategic development in the relevant therapeutic areas.

Key Takeaways

  • The '770 patent's scope hinges on the specific chemical compounds and their use in therapy; any commercial activity must account for its claims.
  • The patent landscape suggests strong regional patent protection, especially in key markets such as the US, Europe, and China.
  • Competitors are likely to file for similar compounds; extensive freedom-to-operate analyses are advised.
  • Patent validity and enforceability depend on continuous patent prosecution, prior art challenges, and potential oppositions.
  • Due diligence on claim language and patent family status is essential for translational research or licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed by U.S. Patent 10,842,770?
A1: It claims specific chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of therapeutic use, with details dependent on the exact chemical structures and claims included in the patent.

Q2: Can the claims of the '770 patent be challenged?
A2: Yes, through re-examination, patent invalidity proceedings (e.g., inter partes review), or opposition based on prior art or lack of inventive step.

Q3: How broad are the patent claims in this patent?
A3: Likely moderate to broad, depending on chemical scope and therapeutic indications; dependent claims refine this scope.

Q4: Which jurisdictions is the patent likely filed in or granted?
A4: The patent family probably includes key markets such as the US, Europe, China, and possibly Japan or Canada.

Q5: How does this patent landscape affect generic drug development?
A5: The patent provides a temporary monopoly, blocking generic entry; challenging or designing around claims is necessary post-expiry or if patent validity is challenged.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Document: U.S. Patent No. 10,842,770 (Available via USPTO PAIR and Public Patent Application Database).
  2. WIPO Patent Family Data (if applicable).
  3. Prior art references cited in the patent (assumed for comparative analysis).
  4. Patent Classification Resources: CPC & IPC databases.

Note: Access to the full patent document is recommended for precise claim language and detailed analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,842,770

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-001 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes 10,842,770 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD OF ADMINISTERING DOCETAXEL TO A SUBJECT COMBINING THE DOCETAXEL PRO-EMULSION FORMULATION WITH AN AQUEOUS MEDIUM TO PRODUCE DOCETAXEL EMULSION ⤷  Start Trial
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-002 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes 10,842,770 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD OF ADMINISTERING DOCETAXEL TO A SUBJECT COMBINING THE DOCETAXEL PRO-EMULSION FORMULATION WITH AN AQUEOUS MEDIUM TO PRODUCE DOCETAXEL EMULSION ⤷  Start Trial
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-003 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes 10,842,770 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD OF ADMINISTERING DOCETAXEL TO A SUBJECT COMBINING THE DOCETAXEL PRO-EMULSION FORMULATION WITH AN AQUEOUS MEDIUM TO PRODUCE DOCETAXEL EMULSION ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,842,770

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3552 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2011248449 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112012028037 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2798180 ⤷  Start Trial
China 102970990 ⤷  Start Trial
China 109745287 ⤷  Start Trial
Colombia 6640232 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.