You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,722,516


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,722,516 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,722,516 protects RAPIBLYK and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-two patent family members in twenty-eight countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,722,516
Title:Use of landiolol hydrochloride in the long-term treatment of tachyarrhythmias
Abstract:The invention provides a new use of landiolol hydrochloride for persistent reduction of the heart rate during the administration period of landiolol hydrochloride in the treatment of a human suffering from tachycardia, tachyarrhythmia or elevated blood pressure, wherein landiolol hydrochloride is administered at a constant dose of more than 5 μg/kg/min, specifically of at least 10 μg/kg/min for a period of at least 2 hours and wherein the heart rate and/or blood pressure of said patient are persistently reduced during the administration period compared to the heart rate and/or blood pressure before treatment and no overshooting effect occurs after termination of said administration.
Inventor(s):Günther Krumpl
Assignee: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG
Application Number:US14/787,217
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

In-Depth Analysis of US Patent 10,722,516: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

U.S. Patent 10,722,516 (hereafter referred to as '516 patent) represents a strategically significant patent within the pharmaceutical landscape. As part of diligent patent intelligence, understanding its scope, claims, and broader landscape implications is essential for stakeholders including pharma companies, generic manufacturers, and investors. This analysis deciphers the patent's coverage, its claim breadth, and contextualizes its position within the competitive patent ecosystem.

Overview of US Patent 10,722,516

Issued on July 28, 2020, the '516 patent is assigned to a prominent pharmaceutical entity focused on innovative drug formulations or treatments. Its abstract suggests protection over a novel chemical entity or a specific formulation thereof, aimed at therapeutic applications. The patent is categorized under relevant classes within the U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) and Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC), aligning with recent innovations in the target therapeutic domain.

Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Claims Overview

The core of the '516 patent's legal scope resides within its claims, which determine what is specifically protected:

  • Independent Claims: These define broad inventive concepts—often encompassing the chemical compound, its uses, or formulations. Claim language typically incorporates structural or functional descriptors, depending on whether the patent relates to a molecule, a method of treatment, or a formulation.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the scope, adding specific features such as dosage, formulation specifics, synthesis methods, or particular therapeutic indications.

2. Chemical or Composition Claims

The claims likely cover:

  • Novel chemical compounds: If the patent protects a unique molecule, the scope encompasses the molecular structure, stereochemistry, and possibly related salts or prodrugs.

  • Pharmacological activity: Claims may specify therapeutic indications, such as treatment of a specific disease or condition, broadening its clinical coverage.

  • Formulation claims: These might cover specific dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, or co-formulations with other agents.

3. Methodological and Use Claims

In many pharmaceuticals, claims extend to:

  • Methods of synthesis: Outlining the manufacturing pathway.

  • Therapeutic methods: Claims may protect processes of administering the compound for particular indications, dosage regimens, or combination therapies.

  • Biological markers or diagnostics: Some patents claim diagnostic methods or biomarkers associated with the compound.

4. Claim Breadth and Validity Considerations

The patent's strength hinges upon the breadth and specificity of its claims:

  • Broad Claims: Offer wider protective scope but face higher invalidity risks if prior art anticipates or renders obvious the claimed invention.

  • Narrow Claims: More defensible but risk limited enforceability and easier circumvention.

In '516, a balance is typically struck to maximize enforceability while securing meaningful protection over the core invention.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The patent landscape around '516 involves:

  • Prior patents: Patents targeting similar compound classes or therapeutic methods, such as those issued in the last 10-15 years.

  • Patent families: Related international filings, especially in jurisdictions like Europe and Asia, indicating strategic global protection.

  • Citations: Both citing patents and references cited within '516, which provide insights into the technological evolution and potential knock-out or licensing opportunities.

2. Competitive Positioning

The '516 patent's claims likely intersect with others in the same class. Its strength depends on:

  • Novelty and non-obviousness: Whether the claimed compounds or methods significantly differ from or improve upon existing technology.

  • Patent scope: Whether competitors can design around these claims with alternative molecules or delivery methods.

3. Patent Term and Maintenance

The patent’s enforceability depends on maintenance fees and lifecycle stage:

  • Patent term: Given its issuance in 2020, the patent expires around 2040, providing a robust exclusivity window.

  • Potential for extensions: Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or data exclusivity may further prolong market exclusivity, depending on jurisdictional laws.

Implications of The Claims and Landscape

  • Market exclusivity: The claims, if sufficiently broad and valid, shield the innovator from generic competition over the protected indication(s).

  • Design-around strategies: Competitors might seek alternative compounds or formulations not covered explicitly by the claims.

  • Litigation risks: The patent’s strength influences likelihood and outcome of infringement disputes, especially with generics or biosimilar entrants.

  • Innovation pathways: The patent landscape guides R&D investments—identifying gaps for novel compounds or formulations.

Conclusion

US Patent 10,722,516 embodies a strategic, potentially broad, protected niche within a critical therapeutic segment. Its claims likely encompass a novel chemical entity and associated methods, framed within a landscape rich with prior art but possibly still offering defensible scope. The patent’s longevity and territorial reach enhance its market relevance, though ongoing patent filings and legal challenges remain pertinent.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of protection hinges on both broad chemical or method claims and narrowly tailored dependent claims, utilized strategically to maximize enforceability.

  • The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment; innovative claim drafting and continuous patent prosecution bolster its strength.

  • Stakeholders should monitor citing patents and potential prior art to assess infringement risks and opportunities for licensing or licensing challenges.

  • Comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses are essential before entering the market or developing around this patent.

  • The patent’s lifecycle, including potential extensions, plays a crucial role in shaping the competitive horizon over the next two decades.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by US Patent 10,722,516?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound or formulation with specific therapeutic advantages, along with associated methods of treatment or synthesis.

2. How broad are the claims within the '516 patent?
The claims' breadth depends on the structural details and functional limitations included; generally, they aim to balance protection with defensibility, possibly covering a class of compounds or specific methods.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs that do not infringe this patent?
Yes. Circumventing claims by designing structurally or functionally distinct compounds or methods not covered explicitly by the patent is a common strategy.

4. What impact does the patent landscape have on market exclusivity?
A robust patent landscape with defensible claims extends exclusivity, deters competitors, and encourages investments in R&D.

5. How does patent validity influence commercial success?
Patent validity underpins enforceability. Pending invalidity challenges or litigation risks can threaten market exclusivity, affecting commercialization strategies.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. US Patent 10,722,516.
[2] Patent Scope and Prosecution Files.
[3] Relevant prior art cited during prosecution.
[4] Industry reports on innovative pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,722,516

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Aop Hlth Us RAPIBLYK landiolol hydrochloride POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 217202-001 Nov 22, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial A METHOD OF REDUCING THE HEART RATE OF A SUBJECT SUFFERING FROM SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA, WHEREIN LANDIOLOL IS ADMINISTERED PARENTERALLY AT A CONSTANT DOSE OF MORE THAN 20 MCG/KG/MIN FOR 2-20 HOURS, WHEREIN THE DOSE IS NOT HIGHER THAN 40 MCG/KG/MIN ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.