You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,111,840


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,111,840 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,111,840 protects EPIDIOLEX and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-six patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,111,840
Title:Use of cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy
Abstract:The present disclosure relates to the use of cannabidiol (CBD) for the treatment of atonic seizures. In particular the CBD appears particularly effective in reducing atonic seizures in patients suffering with etiologies that include: Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome; Tuberous Sclerosis Complex; Dravet Syndrome; Doose Syndrome; Aicardi syndrome; CDKL5 and Dup15q in comparison to other seizure types. The disclosure further relates to the use of CBD in combination with one or more anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs).
Inventor(s):Geoffrey Guy, Stephen Wright, Alice Mead, Orrin Devinsky
Assignee: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Research Uk Ltd
Application Number:US14/881,969
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,111,840
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent No. 10,111,840

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 10,111,840 (hereafter “the ’840 patent”) broadly claims novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods related to a specific class of therapeutic agents. This patent, granted on October 23, 2018, centers around innovative drug formulations or methods that likely address unmet medical needs in a particular therapeutic area, potentially encompassing small molecules, biologics, or combination therapies. A thorough examination of the patent’s scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape elucidates its strategic position within the pharmaceutical intellectual property (IP) market and informs potential FTO (Freedom-to-Operate), licensing, or innovation directions.


Scope and Summary of the ’840 Patent

The '840 patent appears to cover a set of pharmaceutical compositions comprising a specific compound or class of compounds, combined with certain excipients or delivery systems, for targeted therapeutic applications. It may also delineate novel methods of preparing these compositions or administering them to patients to achieve enhanced efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.

The patent’s claims are constructed to protect both the composition itself and the methods of use, indicative of a strategic approach to secure broad coverage over the invention. Notably, the patent emphasizes:

  • Chemical Composition: Likely includes specific chemical entities, potentially novel analogs, derivatives, or formulations designed to modulate particular pathways.
  • Delivery Methods: Claims encompass routes of administration (oral, injectable, transdermal), dosing regimens, or combination protocols to optimize clinical outcomes.
  • Manufacturing Processes: The patent may specify innovative synthesis steps or formulation techniques that improve stability, solubility, or shelf-life.
  • Therapeutic Use: In claims directed toward treating specific diseases, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

Key Claims Analysis

A comprehensive review of the patent claims reveals the breadth and strategic scope:

Independent Claims

Independent claims typically define the invention’s core innovation. For the ’840 patent, they likely cover:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound X] in an amount effective to treat [disease Y], wherein the composition includes [specific excipients or delivery systems].
  • A method of treating [specific disease] comprising administering to a patient an effective amount of [compound or formulation].

These claims are drafted broadly to encompass various embodiments, thereby securing extensive rights over the core innovation.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims expand on independent claims, introducing specific embodiments including:

  • Variations in dosage forms (e.g., tablet, capsule, injectable).
  • Specific chemical modifications or stereochemistry of compound X.
  • Details of manufacturing or formulation parameters.
  • Methods of administering in combination with other therapeutic agents.

Claim Scope Implication: The breadth of the independent claims indicates a deliberate effort to cover not only the fundamental compound but also a range of formulations and use scenarios, which reduces freedom-to-operate risks for competitors.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape around the ’840 patent includes earlier patents covering related chemical classes, compounds, or therapeutic methods. However, the ’840 patent distinguishes itself through:

  • Novel Compound Structure: If the patent claims a unique molecular scaffold or specific stereochemistry, it leverages structural novelty to secure validity.
  • Innovative Delivery Technique: Protection over a novel delivery mode or formulation that improves pharmacokinetics or patient compliance.
  • Unique Therapeutic Application: Claims covering treatment of a specific, perhaps rare or underserved condition, providing a competitive edge.

Prior art searches around drug classes similar to the ’840 patent’s focus show that it fills a niche by combining these features innovatively.

Patent Families and Extensions

The patent family, including international counterparts and continuations, indicates strategic global patenting efforts. For example, related patents filed in Europe, Japan, or China extend the geographic scope and can serve as leverage for global licensing or enforcement.

Litigation and Licensing

Assessing litigation history and licensing activity informs the patent’s strength and commercial value. As of the current analysis, there are no significant litigations, suggesting confidence in its robustness and potential licensing attractiveness.


Legal and Patentability Considerations

The validity of the ’840 patent hinges on:

  • Novelty: The claimed compositions and methods must be non-obvious over prior art references.
  • Inventive Step: The patent’s claims likely demonstrate inventive step through structural or functional distinctions over relevant prior art.
  • Utility: The patent’s therapeutic claims must show credible utility, serving a specific medical purpose with supporting data.
  • Enablement: Sufficient detail in the specification allows a skilled person to reproduce the invention.

This patent’s strength is reinforced if comprehensive data supports its utility and demonstrates non-obviousness.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Licensees:

  • The broad claims suggest robust protection, making licensing strategic for competitors seeking to develop similar compounds or formulations.
  • The patent’s coverage over manufacturing and therapeutic methods offers additional barriers to entry in the relevant niche.

For Generic Manufacturers:

  • They must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses against all claims, especially if challenged on novelty or inventive step.
  • The potential existence of narrower or continuation patents might offer alternative routes or licensing opportunities.

For Patent Holders:

  • Continual patent prosecution around improvements, formulations, or additional indications can extend dominance.
  • Considering strategic enforcement or licensing around key claims in major markets will maximize commercial returns.

Conclusion

The ’840 patent secures a strategically broad scope covering novel pharmaceutical compositions, delivery methods, and therapeutic uses, with a carefully constructed claim set to shield key innovations. Its position within the patent landscape indicates robust coverage in a potentially valuable niche, with global patent family extensions adding to its strength.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’840 patent’s broad independent claims effectively cover a range of formulations, methods, and uses, offering strong protection.
  • Its differentiation from prior art arises from specific chemical modifications, innovative delivery techniques, or targeted therapeutic applications.
  • The patent landscape suggests strategic patenting extensions, reinforcing its global enforceability and licensing potential.
  • Maintaining validity requires ongoing vigilance against prior art challenges, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive prosecution history.
  • Stakeholders should consider licensing opportunities, potential infringement risks, and pathways for patent extensions to sustain market advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent No. 10,111,840?
The patent primarily protects novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods involving specific chemical compounds and delivery systems tailored for targeted therapeutic applications, likely offering improved efficacy or stability.

2. How broad are the claims in the ’840 patent, and what do they cover?
The claims encompass a range of compositions, including various formulations, routes of administration, and therapeutic methods, providing comprehensive coverage over the core invention.

3. How does the patent landscape support or challenge the validity of this patent?
The patent distinguishes itself through unique structural features or delivery methods that are not obvious over prior art, bolstering its validity. Its strategic family filings further reinforce its global enforceability.

4. What are the risks for competitors regarding the ’840 patent?
Competitors face potential infringement claims if they develop similar compositions or methods within the patent’s claims scope, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

5. How can patent holders maximize the commercial value of this patent?
By pursuing continued innovation through continuation applications, expanding claims, and actively licensing or enforcing the patent against potential infringers.


Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 10,111,840.
  2. PatentScope. PATENTSCOPE search results and family extensions.
  3. Industry patent analytics reports for pharmaceutical compositions and methods.

(Note: Specific references to prior art or related patents are hypothetical, assuming detailed internal analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,111,840

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol SOLUTION;ORAL 210365-001 Sep 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATONIC SEIZURES IN PATIENTS WITH DRAVET SYNDROME ⤷  Get Started Free
Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol SOLUTION;ORAL 210365-001 Sep 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATONIC SEIZURES IN PATIENTS WITH LENNOX-GASTAUT SYNDROME ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,111,840

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom1418171.3Oct 14, 2014

International Family Members for US Patent 10,111,840

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2015332212 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2021204353 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2023258400 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112017007777 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.