Claims for Patent: 7,166,722
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 7,166,722
| Title: | N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-n′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea salt in crystalline form |
| Abstract: | The present invention provides a crystal of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl) urea. This crystal of salt is usable for the therapy of a disease selected from the group consisting of tumors, diabetic retinopathy, chronic rheumatism, psoriasis, atherosclerosis, Kaposi's sarcoma, and exudation type age-related maculopathy, and has characteristics suitable for applications of oral pharmaceutical preparations. |
| Inventor(s): | Naoki Matsunaga, Satoshi Yoshida, Ayako Yoshino, Tatsuo Nakajima |
| Assignee: | KH Neochem Co Ltd, Kyowa Kirin Co Ltd |
| Application Number: | US10/532,104 |
| Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: | See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,166,722 |
| Patent Claims: |
1. Crystalline N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea monohydrochloric acid salt monohydrate. 2. The crystalline compound according to claim 1, wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ): TABLE A-1 Diffraction angle (2θ) 11.47 ± X 22.59 ± X 23.02 ± X 26.27 ± X 26.63 ± X wherein X is 0 to 0.20. 3. The crystalline compound according to claim 2, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 15%. 4. The crystalline compound according to claim 2, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 20%. 5. The crystalline compound according to claim 2, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 25%. 6. The crystalline compound according to claim 2, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 30%. 7. The crystalline compound according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein X is 0 to 0.10. 8. The crystalline compound according to claim 1, wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ): TABLE B-1 Diffraction angle (2θ) 8.76 ± X 11.47 ± X 15.28 ± X 17.16 ± X 17.53 ± X 18.80 ± X 20.02 ± X 22.59 ± X 23.02 ± X 25.32 ± X 25.43 ± X 26.27 ± X 26.63 ± X 27.00 ± X 28.57 ± X wherein X is 0 to 0.20. 9. The crystalline compound according to claim 8, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 15%. 10. The crystalline compound according to claim 8, wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 20%. 11. The crystalline compound according to any one of claims 8 to 10, wherein X is 0 to 0.10. 12. The crystalline compound according to claim 1, wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has the following diffraction angles (2θ) and relative intensities: TABLE 1 Diffraction angle (2θ) Relative intensity 8.76 22 11.47 100 15.28 21 17.16 21 17.53 23 18.80 21 20.02 25 22.59 35 23.02 37 25.32 29 25.43 23 26.27 36 26.63 32 27.00 29 28.57 28. 13. A process for producing a crystal N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea, monhydrochloric acid salt monohydrate, said process comprising the steps of: adding hydrochloric acid to a solution of N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea in an aprotic polar solvent selected from N,N-dimethylformamide and N,N-dimethylacetamide; adding ethanol and water to the above solution to precipitating crystals from the solution. 14. The process according to claim 13, wherein said hydrochloric acid has a concentration of 10 to 14 N. 15. The process according to claim 13, wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystal has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ): TABLE A-1 Diffraction angle (2θ) 11.47 ± X 22.59 ± X 23.02 ± X 26.27 ± X 26.63 ± X wherein X is 0 to 0.20. 16. The process according to claim 14, wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystal has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ): TABLE A-1 Diffraction angle (2θ) 11.47 ± X 22.59 ± X 23.02 ± X 26.27 ± X 26.63 ± X wherein X is 0 to 0.20. |
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
