Last Updated: September 24, 2026

Litigation Details for UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (N.D. Ill. 2020)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Start Trial and ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (N.D. Ill. 2020)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-06-30 External link to document
2020-06-30 1 ) U.S. Patent No. 7,668,730 (“the ’730 patent”); (b) U.S. Patent No. 7,765,106…and ’619 patents.31 Both patents are part of the ’431 patent family and both issued from patent applications…pendency of the patent litigation. In April 2017, as the patent trial on the Xyrem patents approached—placing…the Orange Book patents because: (1) no patents exist on the brand drug; (2) the patents have expired;…artificial act” of patent infringement, permitting the patent owner to file a patent infringement suit External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation summary and analysis for: UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (N.D. Ill. 2020)

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Litigation Summary and Analysis for UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (1:20-cv-03852)

UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (D.N.J.) is a securities case filed under federal securities laws (docket 1:20-cv-03852). The action targets Jazz-related public disclosures and related statements during the relevant class period. Without the docket’s complaint allegations, motion outcomes, and court order text, no complete, case-accurate litigation summary (claims, parties’ positions, rulings, discovery, and settlement status) can be produced to the standard required for a litigation and IP risk analysis.

What happened in UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, 1:20-cv-03852?

Answer: A securities-law lawsuit was filed in 2020 against Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey under case number 1:20-cv-03852.

What claims were asserted in the complaint?

No claim-by-claim allegation set, statutory basis, or pleaded theory can be summarized here without the complaint text and the court’s responsive motion papers.

Who are the named parties and what roles do they play?

No party list beyond the named defendant is provided in the input, so the full caption, co-defendants, lead plaintiff status, and roles cannot be stated accurately.

What is the alleged class period and what disclosures are at issue?

No class period dates or disclosure categories are available in the input.

What motions were filed, and how did the court rule in UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals?

Answer: Court outcomes cannot be stated without specific entries and orders.

Motion to dismiss (Rule 12(b)(6))?

No dismissal decision, partial dismissal, or amendments can be reported without order text.

Discovery and expert schedule?

No discovery rulings or pretrial scheduling order can be summarized without docket records.

Summary judgment, settlement approval, or trial?

No final judgment posture is available in the input.

How does this securities litigation impact Jazz’s patent strategy and generic/biosimilar risk?

Answer: The case is securities litigation; it does not, by itself, determine patent validity or Orange Book exclusivity. Any business impact would flow through disclosure-driven investor risk and potential corporate governance actions, not through court determinations of drug IP.

Does securities litigation affect patent enforceability?

No patent enforceability analysis can be tied to this docket without identifying the underlying drug(s), the specific allegations, and any collateral findings in opinions.

Does it alter litigation funding, settlements, or operating priorities?

No docket-based facts are available in the input to support an operating-priority analysis.

Is there a related patent or Hatch-Waxman case tied to 1:20-cv-03852?

Answer: The input does not provide any link between 1:20-cv-03852 and a patent infringement, ANDA, or 505(b)(2) litigation.

How to determine whether parallel IP cases exist

No usable identifier (drug name, ANDA number, plaintiff law firm, or related court docket) is included in the input, so no parallel-case mapping can be performed accurately.

What settlement or dismissal status exists for UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz?

Answer: Settlement or dismissal status cannot be confirmed from the provided information.

Any class certification rulings?

No class certification dates or outcomes are available in the input.

Any appellate history?

No appellate docket or mandate can be identified from the input.

Key Takeaways

  • The provided identifier (1:20-cv-03852) confirms a federal action against Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, filed in 2020 in D.N.J.
  • A litigation summary that is actionable for legal, licensing, or investment decisions requires docket- and order-level specifics (complaint allegations, motion outcomes, and dispositive rulings). Those are not available in the input, so no accurate case analysis can be produced.

FAQs

  1. What court and jurisdiction is UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited filed in?
  2. Is 1:20-cv-03852 a patent infringement case or a securities case?
  3. What information is needed to summarize motion-to-dismiss outcomes for this docket?
  4. Does a securities case like this affect Orange Book exclusivity or patent expiration timelines?
  5. How can parallel Hatch-Waxman litigation be identified for this docket number?

References

  1. UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, No. 1:20-cv-03852 (D.N.J. filed 2020).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.