Litigation Details for Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2021-02-10 |
| Court | District Court, E.D. Michigan | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Stephen J. Murphy III |
| Jury Demand | Defendant | Referred To | R. Steven Whalen |
| Parties | ROBIN ROE 1 THROUGH 10 | ||
| Patents | 10,112,021; 10,138,279; 10,525,121; 6,375,986; 7,015,018; 7,276,249; 7,320,802; 8,013,113; 8,039,010; 8,084,021; 9,000,002; 9,020,056 | ||
| Attorneys | Nicholas J. Ellis | ||
| Firms | Foley & Lardner LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-25 | 12 | Response to Motion | 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published… 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published Application No. 2006/0163149; U.S. Published …one count of patent infringement of United States Patent No. 8,163,802 (“the ’802 Patent”) against BlueWillow…’802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103: U.S. Patent No. 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803…BlueWillow did not infringe Trutek’s patent; and (ii) Trutek’s patent is invalid. Trutek | External link to document |
| 2021-10-20 | 16 | Answer to Counterclaim | 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. 19 Published Application…infringement of 11 U.S. Patent No. 8,163,802 ("the '802 Patent") by BlueWillow, but …suit alleging one count of patent infringement 15 of the '802 Patent against BlueWillow. 16 … '802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103; U.S. Patent No. 18 …Further, while Defendant cited four patents and 23 two patent application publications to support | External link to document |
| 2022-05-11 | 28 | Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint | the Same." c. U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279 issued on November 27, 2018 to James R. …proper under the Patent Venue Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) since the tort of patent infringement occurred…1995, United States Patent No. 5,468,488 (hereinafter the '488 Patent) was issued to WAHI …x27;488 Patent was assigned to TRUTEK. 8. On October 7, 1997, United States Patent No. 5,674,481…2005, United States Patent No. 6,844,005 (hereinafter the '005 Patent) was issued to WAHI | External link to document |
| 2022-05-25 | 30 | Exhibit E - October 25, 2021 Email from S. Kremen to L. Peterson and Attached Oc | 206,996; and 10,525,121, all assigned to Nanobio. Further, I reviewed United States PatentNumbers 7,314,624… associated with the Nanobio patents. It is my belief that these patents as well as other publications…claims 1 and 2 of the.'802 Patent (owned by Tfutek) wifh the patents apd other publications describins…researched the patents'claims of both Trutek and Blue Willow and noting the patents and public armouncements…14312. At your request, I reviewed United States Patent No. 8,163,802 (hereinafter the '802 PatenJ | External link to document |
| 2022-09-26 | 39 | Exhibit 1 - Trutek's Interrogatory Answers | No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published Application No. 2006/0163149; U.S. Published…The term "Asserted Patent" or “Patent-in-Suit” shall mean U.S. Patent No. 8,163,802 (…802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103: U.S. Patent No. 6,559,189; U.S. Patent …identifying each patent claim that You contend has been infringed by the asserted patent or will be … of the '802 Patent invalid. According to the law, the '802 Patent is presumed valid | External link to document |
| 2023-03-15 | 56 | Exhibit 1 | United States Patent No. Filed April 13, 2007, claiming 10,138,279 (“Baker ’279”)…infringing claims 1, 2, 6 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 8,163,802 (“the ’802 Patent”) and have been asked to provide… including the ’802 Patent (Exhibit 1), the file history of the ’802 Patent (Exhibit 34), and have …references were before the Patent Office during prosecution of the ‘802 Patent except “Wahi ’488” and …the patent being considered. 37. I understand that prior art to the ’802 Patent includes | External link to document |
| 2023-03-15 | 57 | Exhibit 3 | + 51 4 3 3 +% - 8/9. -.0 2 +% 4 <2' 5 < … 10 February 2021 4:21-cv-10312 Patent None District Court, E.D. Michigan | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
