Litigation Details for Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2015-08-06 |
| Court | Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Date Terminated | 2015-11-09 |
| Cause | Assigned To | ||
| Jury Demand | Referred To | ||
| Patents | 10,018,625; 6,620,847; 6,939,539; 8,008,032 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-12-06 | 134 | 3-27:9) (’215 Patent); A1377(49:13-18); A1384(79:3-10); A1385(83:10-18) (’625 Patent)]. Thus…three Ericsson patents—the ’568, ’215, and ’625 Patents—and validity of the ’625 Patent. [A231-33] The…:14) (’215 Patent); A1395(122:3-122:10) (’568 Patent); A1389(97:14-16) (’625 Patent)] And at trial…of Law Patents-in-Suit the ’435, ’625, ’568, ’223, and ’215 Patents FRAND… three of Ericsson’s patents, given that: a) ’568 Patent: Defendants’ products | External link to document | |
| 2015-11-19 | 36 | U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Digibox. Pet. 5, 8– 8–32. a. Digibox (Ex. …transitional proceeding only for a patent that is a covered business method patent." AIA § 18(a)(1)(E). …restrictions; not every patent petitioned is a covered business method. Indeed, the two patents for which JPMC…IPR-Related Patents Finally, JPMC urges the Court to find jurisdiction to stay all five patents in this… remaining three patents because no CBMR petitions have been filed for those patents (and none instituted | External link to document | |
| 2016-02-10 | 43 | 1338, 1341. During prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 6,620,847, the patentee made arguments equating “…the other patent in suit, U.S. Patent No. 7,346,766 (“’766 patent”). (JA0244.) The ’766 patent issued on… U.S. Patent No. 6,728,877 (“’877 patent”) eventually issued. (JA0073.) Before the ’877 patent issued…pages. See Internet Patents, 790 F.3d at 1344; U.S. Patent No. 7,707,505. IPC’s patented technology affected…Original, Abandoned Patent Application On April 28, 1999, Tranxition filed U.S. Patent Application No | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
