Litigation Details for SUCAMPO AG v. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (D.N.J. 2018)

✉ Email this page to a colleague

Docket	⤷ Try a Trial	Date Filed	2018-10-30
Court	District Court, D. New Jersey	Date Terminated	2020-07-01
Cause	15:1126 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Freda L. Wolfson
Jury Demand	None	Referred To	Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Parties	TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED
Patents	7,795,312; 8,026,393; 8,097,653; 8,338,639; 8,389,542; 8,748,481; 8,779,187
Attorneys	ALEXANDER COLIN MECH
Firms	Rivkin Radler LLP
Link to Docket	External link to docket

The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .

Subscribe to access the full database, or Try a Trial
Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2018-10-30	1		Sucampo AG owns United States Patent No. 7,795,312 (“the ’312 patent”) titled, “Method for Treating…action for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,795,312, 8,097,653, 8,389,542, 8,026,393, 8,338,639…of the ’312 patent, Claims 1-13 of the ’542 patent, Claims 1-9 and 11-21 of the ’393 patent, Claims 1-…481 patents, or any later expiration of any patent term extension or exclusivity for these patents to …of 103 PageID: 5 “the patents-in-suit”). This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States	External link to document
2020-07-01	34	Order of Dismissal	United States Patent Nos. 7,795,312 (“the ’312 Patent”) , 8,026,393 (“the ’393 Patent”), 8,097,653 (… (“the ’653 Patent”), 8,338,639 (“the ’639 Patent”), 8,389,542 (“the ’542 Patent”), 8,748,481 (“the ’… ’481 Patent”), and 8,779,187 (“the ’187 Patent”) (collectively, the “Sucampo Patents”). Plaintiffs’ …INJUNCTION This action for patent infringement (the “Patent Litigation”) has been brought by …charges of patent infringement, Sun has alleged certain defenses, including that the Sucampo Patents are invalid	External link to document
>Date Filed	>Document No.	>Description	>Snippet	>Link To Document