Litigation Details for SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, LLC (D.N.J. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, LLC (D.N.J. 2015)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2015-01-15 |
| Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | 2015-06-05 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Jerome B. Simandle |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Karen M. Williams |
| Parties | BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED | ||
| Patents | 8,129,431; 8,669,290; 8,754,131; 8,871,813; 8,927,606 | ||
| Attorneys | MELISSA ANNE CHUDEREWICZ | ||
| Firms | Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett and Dunner | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, LLC
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, LLC (D.N.J. 2015)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-06-04 | 32 | Stipulated Consent Judgment and Injunction | ’ U.S. Patent No. 8,129,431 (“the ’431 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,669,290 (“the ’290 patent”), U.S.…U.S. Patent No. 8,754,131 (“the ’131 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,871,813 (“the ’813 patent”), and U.S.…U.S. Patent No. 8,927,606 (“the ’606 patent”) asserted against Defendants are not held invalid or unenforceable…431, ’290, ’131, ’813 and ’606 patents in any future litigation, patent office proceeding, or otherwise…Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 161 ’606 patents are valid, enforceable, and would be infringed | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
